Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Hi Nickington,
Good question! 
The FAQs are for better UX.
Also, thinking on mobile UX it is great to have a list and quickly find out the option that I really need.
Browseo's amazing tool might help you to kow out what are the signasl that the algorithms can read about a page of your website.
Said that, I think that your FAQs page is doing great.
Although you might consider to check the Moz SEO Guide on regard the Meta Keywords. Good luck!
Mª Verónica
Hi Ajaz,
From SEO point, yes it's worth!
You already stated that helps for faster indexing just by sharing your content there, pasting an URL from your website´s articles.
Those links, as you said, do not pass ranking due to all of those are "nofollow". Although, the algorithms of the search engines read those signals anyway.
Every good SEO signal counts.
Perhaps you might consider to share posts of fellow SEOs from overseas, who have similar topics although no direct competitors, of course. 
Also some nice comments, from time to time, work like magic for social engagement.
By the way, G+ is one of the options of having up to 3 mentions into a single page of results; the triple pack, a page of your website that anwers the query and an organic result from your Google+ that answers the query too. Good luck!
Mª Verónica
Hi Ronell,
I noticed that Penguin 4, by devaluing some inbound links/page - though not the whole website - now shows other pages of the same website to the same query and the most important; with the same SERP position that the devaluated page had.
Hi EGOL,
Answering your question: Yes, it is a great option, especially due to sharing an URL is not time consuming at all.
So far, from time to time I include the link of an article. Although, I only focus on having a free glass window for some of my work.
Linked to my website, which by the way I let dropped down due to it was to much time consuming.
Like in almost all professions I have practically no time for my own stuff, fully dedicated to my clients. That is more than enough if I wish a life for myself.
Mª Verónica
Hi Liz,
Sorry to hear about the drop. It seems a new update happened yesterday as it is shown in the MozCast Although it is no possible to say if it was Penguin or other, with so little data.
Hi Jim,
Did you upload a "disavow all" file?
No
Great
Did you add the new property - https - to the Google Search Console?
how to add https to Google Search Console? Should we do it or not?
Yes you ought to!
You have to add all versions of the website (if you did not add the http versions in the past to Google Search Console, formerly known as Google Webmasters).
Where?:
https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/
How to do it?:
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6332964?
What properties?:
http://infohub.com/
https:/infohub.com/
http://www.infohub.com/
https://www.infohub.com/
After all those were done:
Into this property only: https://www.infohub.com/
veryfy the robot texts
upload a site map
fetch as google
You will see data starts to be shown and index within a few days.
Did you inadverted deleted the Google Analytics code?
Don't think so. We still see site traffic stats in our GA account. That means the GA code is in place, right?
Yes.
Good luck!
Mª Verónica
Hi Ben,
I assume that you published the page, before the SF attempt.
Regarding your exact question, if there is no meta description established, Google will pick up from the content in your page. Let´s say it is much better if you use that huge opportunity to rank in SERPs as well as to engage the Google visitors to became visitors to your website, by creating a wonderful appealing meta-description. Yes, normally it will affect due to Google algorithms might chose from your content not the most appealing meta description for attract your desired visitors.
Is the noodp Meta Robot Tag in place?
Mª Verónica B.
I updated a few home pages and some landing pages, so far so good!
Although, I wish to know about other experiences, before continue updating. Thanks for your comments!
Hi Ryan,
Congrats on your great link!
Hope this clarifies your doubts.
Did you use the Google Search Console tool "inspect any URL in..." ?
Did you search for the page - Google search box - that has the link, and then follow the link to your website?
Regarding on how the link will improve the DA, it is hard to say. In my experience, can be from 2 up to 12. Why? it dependes on many factors like the PA of the page, if the page is highly related to the content into your website, if that content is "clear" for Google due to your meta tags are also related to the subject, it is within the best practices and so.
Cyrus Shepard en-lights the subject here: https://moz.com/blog/20-illustrations-on-search-engines-valuation-of-links
Good luck! and please update us with the results. Happy New Year!
Mª Verónica
Hi Jim,
Besides Gaston and Eli's responses, I truly think that is weird.
I mean that you have not a single inbound link after 22 years!
Did you upload a "disavow all" file?
Did you add the new property - https - to the Google Search Console?
Did you inadverted deleted the Google Analytics code?
Good luck!
Mª Verónica
Hi Alice,
Here are the metrics that I pulled from MozBar
PA: 46
mR: 5.63
mT: 5.76
3,804 links from
69 Root Domains
DA: 35
DmR: 5.05
DmT: 5.07
221,118 links from
455 Root Domains
Subdomain:
221,111 links from
453 Root Domains
Spam
Score:
2/17
Assuming that the content of that website is highly related to your niche, it looks fine. Though I strongly recommend that you check the local reviews.
Mª Verónica B.
It seems so. Although I must confess, I am not absolutely sure if it was a Penguin 4 catch or/and the Unnamed algorithm update occurred last month; as a fellow SEO practitioner, had suggested also.
By the way, due to that is a change not affecting the SERP position; I will not move, till we get more data.
Hi Ajaz,
Sorry, all the time I was assuming that you set your Google+ profile as public.
If it is public, it will be indexed by Google. In that case, if you have content that answers a query done in the search box, your Google+ might appear in the organic search results. If you have a local business, open to the public, you might appear with your Google My Business' page too. As well as a page of your website that might be answering the query.
Basically three options for answer a query and be in the organic results simultaneously, into one page of organic results.
Therefore not limited to only one: if Google My Business and Google+ are coherents with your website's NAP and content.
Attached image shows a triple pack.
Hi Randy,
A first glance - not an SEO audit - there is none consistency between the NAP of the homepage and the NAP in Google My Business. That is extremely important.
Also, there is room for improve the Page title of the homepage, to reinforce the service already mentioned in the Google My Business; a more direct and clear message to the crawlers and for the people looking for video editors.
I am not completely sure; by using the postal code in the page title, you might be limiting Google algorithms to show your website, only for searchers/customers in your vicinity, a quite narrow area.
Mª Verónica B.
You are most welcome! Ruled out the spam score, although it is important to keep an eye on them due to spam score changes over time.
A second consideration: are those inbound links damaging your website?, are they relevant to your site business/interests? For example, your website is a Corporate Bank having a lot of inbound links from gambling sites which have spam score 1, that is not a good signal, not due to the spam score, but as a bad signal for trust.
Or your website serves a community, with pizza delivery service in Canada, if having a bunch of inbound links from shoe stores in Australia, those are not relevant nor a good signal either. At the time somebody looks for a pizza, Google algorithms might decide to show other pizza delivery, instead the one with that bizarre signals related to interests and locations.
If neither of those issues are in place, as a general rule no action is necessary.
Mª Verónica B.
Hi Radi,
I think that is because the competitor has more accurate title tags and meta descriptions on regard the query - hand therapy Sydney - despite they do not have inbound links pointing those pages. They answer the query accurately. It is not all about links. Content - answering the query - first and above all. On top of that, they are first in Google local listings. https://moz.com/blog/why-listing-accuracy-is-important-whiteboard-friday
All the best,
Mª Verónica B.
Hi,
As you already noticed on regard SEO, it is not water which passed under the bridge, since 2004, it was a whole flood!
Said that, I strongly recommend that you update the SEO of your old domain before consider a migration or a redirect.
Nowadays, Google knows a lot about the owner of any domain. That is a factor too.
All succesfull migrations bring almost all the SEO rank, whether is a good or a bad one. If your website is now having a penalization due to old back links, link schemes from the past that you might have forgotten or you do not know about, lack of h1: the best option is to fix up all the SEO issues, accordingly to SEO 2018 best practices, before the migration or redirect.
Sadly, Google has long term excelent memory and great data bank. Good luck and Happy New Year!
Mª Verónica
What at first seems to be inexplicable, appear possible causes.
First a pop up, which Google penalizes since last February.
Secondly, despite the chain of redirects, the second page has better PA and mR.
Hope this helps. Good luck!
Mª Verónica
Hi Ryan,
Hope this clarifies the issue.
I conduct SEO Audits, I check the work done by other SEO practitioners. Therefore, I understand that many websites' owners or managers do not differentiate a dofollow from a nofollow link nor a low spam score link from a high spam score link. That's why some link builders show/deliver those useless links to their clients, and clients are very happy at first.
Also, there are plugins for remove the nofollow in WP comments and replace it for dofollow as well as some hackers can change that, you do not notice it, unless you check for an odd plugin and/or changes in the code.
Mª Verónica
Hi,
It seems that the website has a similar situation as the one that I shared before.
Although, I had to take immediate action due to it was creating a very serious problem by sending malicious signals to all the crawlers.
Also, I discovered the issue by using the same Moz feature.
Thanks Moz!
https://moz.com/community/q/more-than-450-pages-created-by-a-hacker
In my experience, by sending all those pages to a new hidden page, using a 301 and the noindex and nofollow directives. It is, somehow, sending the right signals to the crawlers of Google and the other search engines.
Let's say strongly informing all the crawlers, that those spam pages/404 are not relevant nor interesting for your website.
Andy's response agrees that is the best solution. Also, he recommends the Wordfence plugin for WordPress as a preventive measure to avoid further issues.
Good luck!