Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
So far my best method for same day indexing is having a history of posting daily and doing it consistently. In my case, I was getting indexed like you were. After awhile, my indexing rate picked up. I think this is one of those SEO issues where the answer is keep at it and hope they notice.
First of all, is it a problem for you? Have you seen random spammy links to your site and a drop in SERP? If it isn't, don't sweat it. It would takea lot of time or money for a competitor to create enough bad links to hurt you. Unless you're in a Hatfields and McCoys situation with a competitor, I think it's unlikely.
If you're really worried about it, do a lot of White Hat link building. At least then you have something to balance out a competitor's sabotage.
Links in comments may not be passing you any SEO juice. Since comment spam is such a big problem for blog owners, most comment links are rel=nofollow.
Since your blog is very focused, I suggest finding other blogs and organization websites about Dyslexia or cognitive issues for adults. Then reach out to them.
Explain who you are and what you offer, and that you want to create a relationship with them. Offer to write a unique article on your topic or to profile them on your blog in exchange for a link. This is the best way to do natural link building. Given that your topic is scientific, you may be able to get backlinks from some really trusted .org or .edu sites.
Go to Google Webmaster Tools => Optimization => Remove URLS
In order for Google to remove the URL, you will need to do 1 of the following:
1. Block it with robots.txt, but it sounds like it's too late for that.
2. If you removed the old development content, make sure that the old content's URL produces a 404 or 410 status code.
3. Block the content with a Meta noncontent tag.
In my opinion, option 2 is the easiest since you should have a 404 page anyway.
I've seen a drop in traffic, but it may be a business cycle. I'm a consumer bankruptcy lawyer, and we see lots of peaks and valleys in our filing rates, which correlate to the peaks and valleys in site traffic.
When I'm in the regular search results it's clear that I'm a debtors lawyer, have a payment plan etc., because of how I set up the description text. When I'm in the map results, I'm blending in with all the other results.
I do my business' SEO. I own a bankruptcy firm, so we're in the same boat SEO wise. I've found that content really helps you move up the rankings. I have a competitor with thousands of inbound links who used to beat the hell out of me, but he never added content.
I blog regularly. It's tough to get in the habit. I try to write three 500 word posts at a time and then schedule them to publish every other day. It helps you Google that you have a fresh site. It also helps you hit the long tail searches like "hair clog in drain."
Also, I second Quilbur. Having two closely related sites can hurt you.
If you have some SEO software that streamlines the process, you can do it pretty quickly. I've used Link Assistant and iBusiness Promoter, but it's been awhile.
Both have their pros and cons. The biggest problem is that you end up paying a fair amount for them. It doesn't make sense to pay for them, unless you plan on doing a lot of link building. Also, I'd go with the free trial software just to be sure you can load your list. As I recall Link Assistant lets you load CSV spreadsheets.
My site was routinely ranking in the top 2-3 in Google for my relevant search terms. Then I started working on my local SEO. Now I'm in the map list at 1-2, but my site no longer shows up with the rest of the search results. I've heard that this has been happening to other local businesses with a big Google presence.
I'm thinking that I should create some micro sites for each location listing that gives a location specific intro and then links to my main site. Then I can sever my main site from Google places. Here are my two questions:
1) Is this going to kill my placement in the map results; and,