Don't sweat it! Unless Google just sent you a message that you have a problem with bad links pointing to your site there is nothing to worry about. Google reps have stated many times that there isn't a problem with having potentially nefarious sites point to yours- otherwise people would build evil links to their competitors sites to try to take them down. This isn't the case. The only exception is that if you are paying for a link with them or it appears that you are, you may be penalized or removed from the index. As of last week Google has been letting people know with an email if their links are questionable.
Posts made by reilly3000
-
RE: Bad back links
-
RE: How unique do product descriptions need to be?
The best thing you can possibly do for getting more unique content is to encourage user-generated content which is typically in the form of reviews, but can be anything (photos, video reviews, FAQ's, etc).
Product descriptions are inherently and necessarily non-unique. I really believe that simply spinning phrases or rewriting a paragraph here and there is a low value activity. A much more sustainable activity is to pick a handful of interesting, current, high margin products and create the absolute best page about them on the web. A personal story, a groupon-style humorous reference, some unique research... whatever, and just dominate that product with content. You'll rank for that and also probably earn some love from customers for being so cool. Keep doing that one by one and carve out a niche. I bet if you do that 10 times really well you'll get a much better ROI for your time and/or cash than 10,000 pages of slightly varied copy.
Unique content only goes so far. A strong domain with piflered copy will outrank others with the same content all day long. They sometimes even beat sites with totally unique content. As unfair as this is, building domain authority takes of time and investment, and is rewarded with traffic for having trusted content.
Finally, my dablings in the dark side have taught me that Google is getting much smarter about spun content, aka content that is thinly unique. 30-40% unique is definitely not unique enough. Varying synonyms is not enough. Significantly unique content varies in theme, length, and style - all of which are algorithmically detectible. Hope that helps.