Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi Ryan,

What about feedburner urls? Any best practices for feedburner?

All from external sites,

Creating my own RSS feed

Do you have examples of sites that use the mashup approach successfully?

What SEO advice do you have for RSS feeds?

Specifically, does the URL structure matter?

Should the be noindex, follow or noindex, follow?

Any other advice?

Is there a reason why JS is better than Divs/css or does it matter?

So, if you have an article that  you want to divide into five parts for a better user experience, what is the best way to put all of the content on one url? divs and css or javascript?

Which is better to fix a pagination problem, javascript or HTML/DIVs? I know in one Google Webmaster Forum, a Google engineer recommends Javascript, but I've also seen people use DIVs.

If I create a page that pulls a 10 snippets of information from various external site, would that content be considered duplicate content?

If I link to the source, would it be recommended to use a "nofollow" tag?

Thank you for the quick reply. The noindex, follow, also passes link juice as well though, correct? To the pages it links to?

Regarding "link juice" between canonical and no-index--if all 100 pages are canonicalized to 1 url, that url will received "link juice" from all 100 pages, correct? And, if the noindex, follow tag is used, then the "link juice" will be distributed to all urls on each of the individual pages?

Is it a bad idea to use rel=canonical from several pages back to one (if you are planning on no-indexing them)? Does this concentrate the “link juice” from those several pages back to one?

For duplicate pages created by the "print" function,

seomoz says its better to use noindex (http://www.seomoz.org/blog/complete-guide-to-rel-canonical-how-to-and-why-not)

and JohnMu says its better to use canonical http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=6c18b666a552585d&hl=en

What do you think?

hmm, I actually need a near to complete list if possible

when viewing urls in google's index, is it more accurate to refer to site:www.domain.com or google webmaster tools (urls in web index)?

Is there a way to export an exact list of urls found in Google's index?

In the google webmaster forums, google specifically states that you should not include search results in the google index. What is the best way to make dynamic, great content show in search results without receiving a penalty?

I found that doctor.webmd.com was affected by Google Panda, and then recovered (if you look at traffic on compete.com). What do you think they did to recover?

The below url is showing up as "not crawled" on opensitexplorer.com, but when you google the title tag "Joel Roberts, Our Family Doctors - Doctor in Clearwater, FL" it is showing up in the Google index. Can you explain why this is happening? Thank you

http://doctor.webmd.com/physician_finder/profile.aspx?sponsor=core&pid=14ef09dd-e216-4369-99d3-460aa3c4f1ce

So, if someone links to www.domain.com/abc#xyz and www.domain.com/abc#nz, then it is the same as linking twice to www.domain.com/abc?

Thanks!