Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Can you clarify what you mean by "Also with the necessity to include text in the beginning of the website, is difficulty to found something really good."? Are you looking for code that has the content first then the navigation? If so, that's not nearly the big deal that it once was.

Haven't used it myself but there are definite benefit - http://googlecode.blogspot.com.au/2010/11/make-your-websites-run-faster.html

Well I think it's correct what both SirMax and Jose Garcia Jr say, web 2.0 was an incredible change in the that way eaverybody could use the web and interact in it. Actually everybody can open a new blog for free, can write on the other blogs, can interact with friends in the social network thanks to web 2.0 social view. Before this, websites were only static paper-like advertising posters with no interaction possibilities. I can't say if this change drove to a new graphic style or if a new graphic style helped us to change, now the web 2.0 style, made by gradients, glossy buttons, and icons as J.G Jr said is a standard. Obviously web 2.0 style doesn't mean automatically web 2.0 intercatcion, it could be good for some tasks, less for others, it depends on what your website's made for.

The problem with "myths" like keyword count/density is that they were probably true once. In the last 90s (pre-Google), if you knew the exact density of keywords to use on any given day, you'd rank pretty well on the early search engines. It was a cat-and-mouse game. Things have changed a lot since then, though.

Hy Egol, As I write to vizergy, im totally lost about this theme. When I analyse the websites from my top keywords, none of them have good content (the #1 is an iframe website). You can create good content, but google read this? Is more important to have an trick content to looks nice or really have good content? Im using google.com.br and my keyword is "acampamento" The number 1 website is www.acampar.net. My website is at #12 and it is www.acampamentoaguiasdaserra.com.br

Hi Naghirniac, This is a very general question.  As far as a limit the answer would have to be no, there is no limit.  However, what is going on here?  Are you rebuilding a very large website and attempting to consolidate pages?  Be sure you are pointing old URLs to pages that are very relevant to the old content or you will surely see rankings fall for those pages.  Also, do the old URLs have lots of backlinks?  You may consider contacting the webmasters of the websites that link to your old pages and told of the change so they can update their links to point to the new pages, at least for the more important links – the 301’s will pass most of the juice, but not all. Hope this helps, Vizergy

Thank you Robert..more clear now

When the big update came through a little over two years ago about page speed, I was working on a site with load time issues. I did see quite the drop in organic referrals from Google after that update was pushed, while organic referrals from Bing and Yahoo continued to increase. I was working in-house at the time, so I don't have a lot of other sites to judge at that time, but I did see distinct change in that one site. I also agree with you that load time affects users and their browsing and conversion behavior. And even though "everybody has broadband" there are a lot of people on poor public (or conference) wifi connections or on their phones, and pagespeed is quite important to them.

I will give a try...thanks

Now is more clear...thanks

Hey Naghirniac, I want to mentioned you that If you had submitted the video to you tube then it will plays a crucial role in ranking & overall the visibility of your website will increased because you tube is the largest search engine after Google. If you are not getting then please carefully saw the example below. Suppose a there is a company name abc.com who is in the field of  mobile development field.If they want to advertise the company through a video or they make a video showing their working culture then it is not sufficient that they only put the video on their website only. But they have to put the video on the social networking websites or they upload the video on the you tube to increase their web presence in the field of software development or in order to promote themselves & we all know that the best measure to promote anything is the search engines & social media. I hope that you will find the solution.

Does this compression impact pagespeed in a positive way?

H Naghimiac, Many directories charge, but this doesn't mean they are black hat. The key concept is editorial inclusion. A directory that accepts anyone is not a directory you want to be associated with. This includes directories filled with porn, gambling and payday loan sites. On the other hand, the harder it is to get into a directory, the more value it usually passes. This is true even when the directory charges money for "review" services. Be careful - directory listings are meant to enhance your backlink profile, not act as a foundation. Here's a helpful article: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/seo-link-directory-best-practices Best of luck!

build your own layout, most CMS templates that boast SEO friendly just arent.

I just craweled your site and I found a few html errors, but apart from that I did not find much wrong.

John Barth is absolutely correct. Title attributes add no value to the SEO and acts only as a tool tip. But yes, it could be used for better user experience.

Content has no "direct" role to play in affecting the PageRank. PR is calculated via backlinks. Further, if you want your content to be crawled , indexed and rank in search engines - stay away from frames/iframes.