Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I do agree with Patrick,

This always seems to come up in conversations and I try to sway people against this method.

Sure it may work on a small scale, and I have tried this method myself. But the drawbacks outweigh the benefits.

One final (and big) point to that I would like to reiterate. If you really intend to own and run multiple domains and get these sites to show up in the search results, you will have to double your SEO work”… Another good point. Simply ranking on a keyword really does no good when you can do the same on your own site with minimal effort.

Hi

In addition to the above point made by Eric, I think you can use Google auto suggest as an classical tool. However, i am sharing one link for you get an idea which tool may can help you. Click here.

I hope you will get what you're looking for

Hi

I dont think that you're doing any wrongdoing here unless you're just showing average stars of reviews. However, even if you have plan to show all reviews on the categroy page just make sure to implement canonical tag.
here is complete guide for canonical tags :https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/139066?hl=en

Google had issues understanding links that were embedded in script. ... By linkingwith script it would appear that the link was reciprocated but the site would not pass ...So those old ad networks are now being indexed without much difficulty.

have look at the following link it may help you

http://www.searchenginejournal.com/17-ways-to-get-de-indexed/53537/

Hi Hector,

Google adwords were bever been much reilable to give precise results for search volume however comapre to Google Adwords Moz Keyword Explorer has more accurate results for volume. You can also use SEMrush.

Well, in my views yes you will get benefit out of this change. I would suggest you to run a backlink audit of your old site and make disallow list of all toxic links. Disallow all those and put a 301 redirect as soon as you can.

Another tip, when you do it, try to change your onsite content. This will add up another plus point for your site.

I checked your site, its look amzing i think you will not only retain but will get good result. Moreover, you second domain has more branded power than the current one along with age of the domain.

So Good luck with your change.

In mu opinion, i don't see any issue by having same title as you're changing the discription for each video that will cover up most. However, ideally, you may want to rephrase the title as well.

Hi

I think you must address these redirect issue from htacess file,Furtheremore, you can alsoupdate your robot.txt file with your location folder.

Yes, you're right but when you say short are they just based on few words. I am sure Google would also consider the proporation of each side thin and the details ones.
If most of reviews are just few words, off course you dont want to publish them before even it reach to google not only for Google but for your impression. As these mostly be consider as self created reviews.
I would say be a selective in this regards. Mixture can work

Shockingly, when asked point blank if affiliate programs that employed juice-passing links (those not using nofollow) were against guidelines or if they would be discounted, the engineers all agreed with the position taken by Sean Suchter of Yahoo!. He said, in no uncertain terms, that if affiliate links came from valuable, relevant, trust-worthy sources - bloggers endorsing a product, affiliates of high quality, etc. - they would be counted in link algorithms. Aaron from Google and Nathan from Microsoft both agreed that good affiliate links would be counted by their engines and that it was not necessary to mark these with a nofollow or other method of blocking link value.

But note the point they had not mentioned what will they do with low quality links.

From the above points it clear that Google will passes a link juice. But still many of us in affiliate industry uses a parameters and redirects in affiliate urls. Reason is just simple not all the affiliate are as genuine or reputed as Amazon. So if your links in 50 sites and may be 40 site can be those which Google does not like so links from those site may harm your site.

So as I said above its always good to save website's image while leaving some link juice.

Hi
I dont think, this could be consider as duplication issue at all. Its one image with multiple accessible urls. In addition, Matt Cutts previosuly, had stressed on this issue,he explained emphatically that using stock photos (or even duplicating photos repeatedly on the same site) does not impact your search engine ranking, negatively or positively. I hope this helps