Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi Kristina,

Thanks for the reply, but my question was either poorly worded or misunderstood. I've edited it.

I'm not looking for an exportable list of all the backlinks to my site and where they come from. I'm looking for an exportable list of all the pages on my site, with their respective Page Authority (PA). If there was an additional field of data (such as how many backlinks are directed at those pages, that would be a bonus, but not not required).

Is there a way to run a report through Moz's Open Site Explorer to produce an MS Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet showing Page Authority (PA) for all the individual pages on my site?

Thanks Matt. Appreciate the insight. Funny though: I came here to hopefully shed some subscriptions. Hadn't heard of Ahrefs before though, so it looks like I'll be adding a subscription. Lol.

Thanks Eric. When you say "link tools," do you mean backlink tools? I have noticed that the services report backlinks differently. That's one of the reasons I've kept some of these subscriptions.

Hi all,

I'm currently subscribed to Moz Pro, SEMrush, SpyFu, Majestic, and WordTracker, and there seems to be a lot of overlap with this SEO services. I'm thinking of cancelling SpyFu, Majestic, and WordTracker, but wanted to get some thoughts from people more familiar with these services. Am I missing something, or is there a great deal of redundancy with these subscriptions?

Everett,

Thank you. Very much appreciate the detail. Will definitely check out JSON-LD.

Thanks for all the responses! Much appreciated.

Greetings All,

My law office features many pages with what are essentially directory listings (names, addresses, and phone numbers of places, agencies, organizations that clients might find helpful).

Am I correct in assuming that using schema for each of these listings might cause confusion for search engines? In other words, are search engines looking for schema on pages or sites to tell them only about the company running that page or site, or do search engines appreciate schema markup to tell them about all the pieces of content on the pages or that site?

Google seems to distinguish between attorney and lawyer, and pages optimized for either word seem to rank differently depending on the search term. For years, I used attorney almost exclusively because attorney was preferred on the U.S. west coast while lawyer was preferred on the U.S. east coast. Now they are almost equal-- which makes it more difficult to decide which word to focus on.

I was hoping there was a way I could have duplicate pages with only the one word changed, and then somehow use canonicalization to avoid being penalized for duplicate content.

Thoughts?

How does one best go about optimizing a page, meta title, and meta description for two keyword when the two keywords mean the same thing (e.g. attorney vs. lawyer). It's awfully tedious, obnoxious, and spammy-looking to keep putting "attorney/lawyer," "attorney-lawyer," or "attorney or lawyer" into content, titles, and descriptions.

How does one best go about optimizing a page, meta title, and meta description for two keyword when the two keywords mean the same thing (e.g. attorney vs. lawyer). It's awfully tedious, obnoxious, and spammy-looking to keep putting "attorney/lawyer," "attorney-lawyer," or "attorney or lawyer" into content, titles, and descriptions.

Thanks Christy. I wasn't aware of the "strict no solicitation policy." I wasn't looking for solicitations as much as recommendations (but I agree they are awfully similar). I've edited my original question. Cheers.