That's really useful (and interesting) Erica - thanks so much 
Posts made by McTaggart
-
RE: Duplicate content and blog/twitter feeds
-
Duplicate content and blog/twitter feeds
Hi Mozzers, I have a question...
I'm planning to add a blog summary/twitter feed throughout my website (onto every main content page) and then started worrying about duplicate content.
What is best practice here?
Let me know - thanks, Luke
PS. I sat down and re: blog feed... thought that perhaps it would help if I fed different blog posts through to different pages (which I could then edit so I could add<a></a> text different from that in blog). Not sure about twitter.
-
RE: Blog posts, blog archives and duplication
Thanks Marcus - that's very useful. I am using Wordpress as it happens
Off to do some reading... -
RE: What to look for in paid directories
It's a difficult one. I mean, my site (a restaurant/bar) gets a large proportion of its traffic from relevant directories. Actually, 40% of the backlinks to my site are from (mainly) relevant directories. Will it incur penalty? Well, most links to the site are non-directory backlinks, so I think you have to maintain a mix.
-
RE: Spammy page titles and the consequences
Thanks eyepaq and Jeffrey. I agree with you guys totally. Strange how many SEOs do spammy stuff these days. From a sustainability perspective, I guess there's a risk Google may flag spammy close-repeat page titles in the future too?
How often is it safe to change page titles too, without upsetting Google? I've heard of people experiencing problems because Google can flag regular changes (or perhaps this is simply an urban myth of some kind ;-))
Thanks again, Luke
-
Blog posts, blog archives and duplication
Just reviewed a blog integrated with my website, and have noticed duplicate content - the blog homepage includes blogpost summaries (not a major issue as now set up so only put in opening paragraphy then anchor text to full blog post).
Then that's a full blog blog post if you click for more - then that's carbon copied over in the archive. So one near exact duplicate.
Is this something worth taking action on with nocrawl tags, etc., on archive duplicates of blog posts, or shouldn't I be to hung-up on this? I'm a scientist by training, so tend to go further and further once I get going...
-
RE: Should the Google Plus button be sitewide?
I always put this sitewide these days, other than pages like directions and contact. Web developers hate it, but I find the share/etc., info from each individual page really useful - ie the pages that aren't engaging with customers are worked on until they DO.
I've heard talk that some users find like counters insulting. Along the lines of 'how dare you ask me for a like' yet whenever I've done site-wide stuff, I've seen improved stats - both visitor numbers and engagement.
-
RE: Spammy page titles and the consequences
Thanks eyepaq yes that sure makes sense, and helps

I was wondering about that - the 'in' - I mean might you pick up more long-tail results without the in? Or perhaps it doesn't make much difference one way or the other...
-
Spammy page titles and the consequences
Hiya Mozzers!
A pal who works in SEO has suggested I add the following type <title>tag structure to my pages:<br /><br />Bars in New York - Bars New York [no brand name]</p> <p>Pizzas in New York - Pizzas New York [no brand name]</p> <p>Firstly, I think this looks spammy, secondly, can't understand the logic of both combinations, thirdly, my understanding is brand name lessens importance of keyphrases, but it's still important from a branding point of view.</p> <p>Fourthly, is this sustainable? I mean, Google could identify this as spammy in the future, with penalty, no? Any feedback on these points would be very useful.</p> <p>Also, he said that I should play around with title tags on an ongoing basis, but I haven't changed any single title tag more than once/6 months for fear of being flagged for manipulative SEO practice by Google. Guidance here would be great as well.</p> <p>Thanking you in advance, Luke</p></title>
-
Removing important section of website, safely
Hi Mozzers,
It's been requested that a top level page on a website I'm working on should be removed.
It concerns me firstly because there are some nice links coming into that page.
I'm also worried because website director has suggested the menu option for that page should simply be removed from all navigation, so you can't find the 'removed' page via his website, but it remains as an indexed page passing linkjuice to website. Is that a risky approach from an SEO perspective?
What's the best approach to this?
Thanks in advance! Luke
-
RE: Does focussing deep linking too much on one page have a negative impact elsewhere?
Thanks Simon for the great answers, and thanks Casey for your interesting question too. Much appreciated

-
Does focussing deep linking too much on one page have a negative impact elsewhere?
Hi, I'm just starting a backlinking campaign on a new website and am focussing on one deep page for client - focussing a lot of good quality backlinks on that one page.
I'm aware that most of the other pages, including homepage, lack good backlinks.
Can I go ahead and focus powerful backlinks on that one 'deep' page without a problem, or may that approach result in negative impacts on other pages' SERPs.
-
RE: Use of <h2class="hidden">- SEO implications</h2class="hidden">
Yes, I agree with you Alan. It's just not worth the risk, it really isn't. The developer might think it is, but it's not his website. Thanks for your advice!
-
RE: Use of <h2class="hidden">- SEO implications</h2class="hidden">
Just spoken to the developer, who I know, and they told me it's fine as they're not keyword stuffing and Main Navigation and Footer are simply there for accessiblity reasons (screenreaders, etc). Any thoughts on that?
-
Use of <h2class="hidden">- SEO implications</h2class="hidden">
I'm just looking at a website with <h2class="hidden">Main Navigation and <h2class="hidden">Footer inserted on each page, and am wondering about the SEO implications.
<a></a><a></a><a></a><a></a></h2class="hidden"></h2class="hidden"> -
RE: Social Media Marketing focus and priorities for SEO
Great answer jassy - and thanks for the links.
I suppose I was trying to work out how you Google is figuring out which of my web pages are actually being interacted with. How it measures that, takes it into account. I was assuming through links to those pages, and you've confirmed that.
Another thing I've been wondering about is whether those facebook, Google plus and twitter counters you see on websites - are they being used to provide an 'interaction' / 'importance' signal to Google in a clearer way?
-
RE: DMOZ submission
I've submitted 3 sites over the last 18 months, and all 3 were accepted within 6-12 months.
-
Social Media Marketing focus and priorities for SEO
Hello Mozzers,
I'm looking at Social Media Marketing and wondering what counts for most in terms of SEO - (A) shares and likes from specific web pages, or (B) followers, likes, etc., on social media profile pages? What does Google measure vis-a-vis your website?
Also, regarding Twitter, if a twitterer forwards on a tweet manually (by inserting RT) - and his RT is then shared, does that count for anything, or is it better for clients if RTweeters simply press the RT button.
And should I include URLs in tweets, facebook posts, etc? And do backlinks help beyond increasing website visitor numbers - do any of the social media marketing tools pass juice back to websites via backlinks? Thanks in advance :), Luke