Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi,

I would recommend using the format [Page h1] | Soobumim Photography. For your example, the title would be Chicago Cubs at Huston Astros MLB | Soobumim Photography.

Wordpress has a lot of options for SEO, so I'm sure that there's some way you can set up the page title to follow that format. I don't use the Yoast plugin, but I found a discussion about putting the page title in here: http://wordpress.org/support/topic/seo-yoast-plugin-duplicate-page-title

Hope this helps,

Kristina

It's generally best practice to connect localized versions of your site with links in the header rather than redirects of any kind. Redirects tell search engines that only one of the pages should be indexed. A link indicates that both pages are important, and both should be indexed. My guess is that you'd like to have the English version of your site rank in America, and the Dutch version of your site rank in the Netherlands.

If you're worried that visitors will come to your site and get lost because there's just a small link in the header, you could create a pop up that says something like, "I see you're in the Netherlands, want to see our Dutch site?"

As an added bonus, when your American customers visit the Netherlands, they'll still be able to visit the American version of your site, since it's their choice.

Yep, that'll work!

Hi Pat,

You're right on track: you should get those long tail optimized landing pages indexed by linking to them from your already-indexed webpages and by submitting an XML sitemap to Google and Bing. And, of course, external links are a plus in any situation.

A few things to keep in mind:

• Those internal links should use the long tail keywords you're targeting as the linking text
• Make sure to fit these new pages into the existing URL structure, but don't add too many subdirectories. If you use the URL www.website.com/folder1/folder2/folder3/folder4/long-tail-keyword, the keyword in the URL won't be nearly as helpful for rankings.
• It might help to submit a sitemap to Google that only includes those long tail keywords. Google Webmaster Tools will give you the number of URLs in your sitemap and the number of those URLs that are indexed but won't specifically tell you which URLs aren't indexed. If you submit a sitemap with just long tail keyword pages, you'll be able to quickly see approximately how many of your long tail optimized pages are indexed.

Good luck!

Kristina

That's what I'd do. Just make sure to set up a 301 redirect from all of those pages to the homepage, so you don't lose any visitors with the change.

Well, I can see that competition for "price drop alerts" is just slightly outranking you, so it's possible that as you or one of your competitors gains or loses a link, rankings are reshuffled, pulling you on and off of the page.

If that's the case, increasing your back links will help keep you at the top.

Hopefully someone else on this forum has had this problem and will be able to give you more specific advice, though!

Ouch. Could you give us an example of one of the keywords that you're seeing these weird ranking issues with?

Is your search traffic increasing when you see your site ranking and decreasing when you don't?

I agree with Irving - you probably want to let Google reindex all of those 301 links, so you might not have a problem at all in a couple of weeks.

It's also possible that "low glycemic foods" is easier to rank for than "low glycemic diet." If you search for "low glycemic foods" in Google, most of the top 10 search results don't actually have that phrase in their page titles or URLs. Since you did, you would have ranked well in comparison. If you search for "low glycemic diet," you can see that the first 6 results (in my personalized view) have the exact phrase "low glycemic diet" in their page title. That's going to make it harder for you to compete with them.

I checked on the search traffic for "low glycemic foods" vs. "low glycemic diet" and found that "low glycemic foods" gets more searches per month than "low glycemic diet." I know that you feel that "low glycemic diet" is more appropriate for your site, but if it's easier to rank for "low glycemic foods" and there are more people searching for "low glycemic foods," I would stick with your original URL.

Hi Frank,

I would change the page titles to:

Tommeys Mardi Gras | [letter] | [page #]

For example, http://www.toomeys-mardigras.com/products_map.php?symb=C&page=4's page title would be:

Tommeys Mardi Gras | C | 4

That'll at least make them different, and show the structure of your site better. Generally, you want the page title first, then the brand, but since most people aren't going to search for the letter C, I put those last.

But, in general, it's probably better not to have massive indexes like this on your site. The category pages are much better for search engine optimization, and when you have both category pages and alphabetical lists, you're duplicating that content.

Hi Frank,

I think that the link you shared is locked for you personally. Do you mind sharing your website URL so we can look it up in Open Site Explorer ourselves?

Google doesn't penalize for duplicate content per se, but it'll generally hurt your rankings:

• If your issue is that you have identical pages with different URLs, leading to duplicate page titles, your link building efforts are going to be split. Google will only rank one of your duplicate pages on its results page, and that page will be weaker because some backlinks go to the duplicate.
• If the issue is that you have different pages that happen to have the same title, both could rank, but the pages won't be easily distinguishable from each other on the results page. It's much better to have a unique page title so that searchers can see what they're going to get from your page.

Hope this helps,

Kristina

There are too many sites out there for Google to define quality by how well the domain matches the search term, so Google also looks at the quality and number of external links a site is getting. (Yes, this is somewhat circular: you want to get links from sites that get a lot of links themselves.) Google refers to this sort of quality as PageRank.

Since no external websites are linking to clearstackingbins.com, it looks like a low quality site to Google. Plus, it only has one page, and that page only has external links, which will make it pretty clear to Google that it's a page set up as a portal to plasticstorage.com, with no value of its own. Google will see that as a low quality site.

Hi,

It's definitely possible that Google will penalize your site for launching low quality exact match domains pointing towards your site, especially since they released Penguin. Penguin has lowered the boost you get from exact match domains and is penalizing sites that get too much traffic from domains that don't seem legitimate (like this one).

I, personally, wouldn't go with this strategy. My guess is that Penguin is just the first step of many from Google to crack down on SEO maneuvers like this one.

Kristina

Hi Jon,

You should 301 redirect (you should rarely to never 302 redirect) all vanity URLs to the URL that you want to rank organically.

A 302 redirect is a temporary one, so it's telling search engines that the vanity URL is the real URL for the page, but it's under construction/temporarily broken/being revamped, so you have to send visitors to another page, just for now. A 301 redirect tells search engines that the vanity URL is just a vanity URL and that the search engine should index the URL that the vanity URL is leading to.

SEOmoz has a pretty good explanation of it all: http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/redirection.

Best,

Kristina