Welcome to the Q&A Forum

It's for sure not an issue on the Google side. Usually things are changing on your side that will influence this. It can be the most minimal change that might have an impact on this. Usually I wouldn't worry about it too much and use your sitemaps to verify what % of your pages is submitted versus indexed.

Hi Michael, So now google will get less interlinking pages is it? 2) Google Already crawled my category pages now when it comes now again on category pages google will not get the such products at category pages so it is fine? Thanks!

Hi Igor, Thanks for your great response. I do have query for point no.4 Header tag as per me it's describe header of the page so at product list page I list 30 products so giving 30 product name as h3 is fine? My site is ecommerce not blog so ... Thanks!

It depends on the customer experience you want and how many products you have to show? There are pros and cons to both of these options: Load more keeps the user on the same page for longer, allowing them to scroll through the options easily without jumping around too many pages. This should increase engagement to let people see everything in one go. BUT, unless you recall these via ajax or something on demand, then 'hiding' these from the user until they click the see more can slow page speed as you're obviously storing all of that data on the page ready to be loaded. Pagination forces people to flick through different pages and would need rel=next/prev set up and canonicalised back to page1, else you may be seen as having duplicate content for meta titles etc unless you can change these dynamically, or set different pages to be no indexed. It can put some people off as can make someone feel like they have to sift through a LOT of pages to find what they're looking for if you have multiple pages. There's a useful study on this here: https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2016/03/pagination-infinite-scrolling-load-more-buttons/ 

The H1s will affect Google. H1s directly affect SEO as it drives how relevant your page is for that keyword. As to whether it would positively or negatively affect SEO is unknown until you do it and depends on the keywords you're targeting and whether the new H1 is better or worse than the new one. Google doesn't particularly care about the other headings too much - as long as they are logical from a user point of view they get bulked into 'content' in terms of SEO rules for relevancy/keyword stuffing etc. The tracking won't affect SEO, but internal linking will affect SEO. If you're linking more to category A for example as compared to the old site linking to category B, then this will give Google a signal that you're site is more relevant to category A terms than B. This goes hand in hand with external linking to give signals to Google. Hope that helps.

Hi Ian, Thanks for your support!

Hello Moz Team, Can anyone tell me it is possible to implemented AMP for single page? Thanks!

Ok so this allows your website to be saved down to the homescreen as a bookmarked icon. Your phone should select the best resolution for your screen from the above dimensions. If you are doing the same for an App - sorry should of asked it may be different depending on how your app is compiled. EDIT : Ignore last bit in first message, looks like I pasted a bit too much

Hi Johny, I recommend only putting schema markup on actual blog posts, and not the category pages. Chances are pretty good that you're not getting much organic traffic to those pages anyway.. There's not a lot of reason for someone to search for something that would land them there, so much so that on every blog I manage I've had /category/ and /tag/ pages deindexed. However, if you're still wanting to do this, you'd have to set the markup for category pages as a separate tag in GTM and then apply a trigger that only applies to URLs in the category folder.

Hi All, Can anyone reply for my query? It's very important for me to take further action. Thanks!