Questions
-
Canonical URLs for Search Parameters
I'm not seeing any evidence that Google is indexing multiple versions, and your canonical tags appear to be correct. Practically speaking, I think you're ok here. I'd make sure that you're at least linking consistently (internally) to the "/" version and not both the "/" and no-slash version. If you're using both links, it could confuse crawlers (and our tools). Your search parameters should be ok, though. I don't see any evidence that those have been indexed. See this query: site:lamangaclubresort.co.uk inurl:datefrom
Moz Pro | | Dr-Pete0 -
Do we have too many links in our footer?
Hi, Yes the footer links are sitewide. ** Then I am sure those are not all 100% relevant for every page and you are spliting the Page Rank juice / equity / votes to all of the pages linked for all pages. I would suggest to keep in the footer: links that user can actually click on and links to releveant pages vs the pages they are placed on links that are not in the page (menu, body, side bars etc) Yes all the links (apart from the corporate links are duplicated in the menubar under the page header. ** They it will make sense to keep there only the ones that are really important not all of them. And again, like stated above, you are spliting the votes to all links per page no matter what if the links are duplicated or not. More then that the anchor text of the footer links won't matter anyway as only the first one is taken in consideration and since the other are above those will be considered.
On-Page / Site Optimization | | eyepaq0