Welcome to the Q&A Forum

This is more of a general question not really a personal question or something we would want to do, just lately I feel that google might have a bit too much info on us and everything really. What I would really like to know is if limiting the amount of data we give to google is an advantage or disadvantage in rankings.

Hi Jessi, If I had to pick one of the 3 options, I'd chose the first, simply because it's the shortest. 1. In general, out of all ranking correlations we know of, longer URLs tend to rank slightly lower than shorter ones. It's not a hugely significant factor, but neither is keyword usage in the URL, as recent correlation data has also shown. 2. Many webmasters believe that URLs without numbers tend to receive a higher CTR than URLs with numbers. That's because our eyes tend to glaze over numbers, and they have an auto-generated look and feel to them. Personally, if numbers are necessary, I'd put them as close to the end as possible. 3. Along the same lines, there is some belief in the SEO world that a shorter directory structure (fewer folders and backslashes) tend to perform better in search, as this creates a virtual flat architecture for Google to crawl. That said, the benefit from this is most likely small in relation to other factors. Just my 2 cents. Hope this helps!