Questions
-
Duplicate Page Content
Oh, sorry - didn't catch that some were duplicated. Given the scope, I think I'd put the time into creating unique titles and single-paragraph descriptions. There's a fair shot these pages could rank for longer-tail terms, and the content certainly has value to visitors.
Technical SEO Issues | | Dr-Pete0 -
Redirecting ?iframe=true&width=80%&height=80%
That's what I was thinking but just wanted to get rid of it if I could.
Technical SEO Issues | | JAARON0 -
My site has a "Reported Web Forgery!" warning
Hi: your two quite similar domains may be the reason that make google and bing confused, have you tried filling these forms: http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/report_error/?tpl=mozilla or check this one: http://www.stopbadware.org/home/reviewinfo and a question ,do both of your domains redirected to same content? Good Luck ! Arta
Technical SEO Issues | | fireproductsuk0 -
Duplicat page content issue I don't know how to solve
Hi Joshua, Written in haste... Firstly if you are going to add unique content to each of the pages that makes them each a best in class page for the terms that you are targetting then the dup issue will be resolved (assuming that you optomise each of the pages correctly). Content about the individual woods, doesn't sound good enough to answer the queastions a searcher might have if they were searching for "Sapele Countertops". In terms of Jquery, it sounds like you need to figure out what you are trying to achive in the first instance. let me know the following and I will try to help further: Have you any evidence that these terms are searched for? Do you have any idea of keyword difficulty http://pro.seomoz.org/tools/keyword-difficulty for these terms? Depending on what your trying to achieve you have loads of options. Hope this helps. Justin
On-Page / Site Optimization | | GrouchyKids0 -
How different does each page tilte need to be?
Hi Josh, Keeping in mind I don't know anything about wood counters and kitchen islands, I would make this observation about your title: <title>walnut kitchen island with undermount sink and tung-oil wood seal(65)er | J. Aaron</title> 1. Too long. You've only got about 65 spaces for a title, then Google clips off the rest. I limit titles to 60 spaces or less. 2. You've got what appears to be 2 related keywords (which you could probably rank for on one page) and a 3rd unrelated keyword in "tung oil wood seal." 3. "Walnut Kitchen Island" looks like a good long tail keyword to me (kitchen island would be short while adding the walnut is a longer tail qualifier). 4. The longer the tail, the more you qualify the buyer. 5. I tighter title would be: "Walnut Kitchen Island with Undermount Sink by J. Aaron" 6. Depending on your site structure you might have a page with a variety of Walnut Kitchen Islands on it with a link to a separate page with an undermount sink (which is what this revised title would suggest). 6. "Tongue Oil Wood Seal" seems like it should be on a page about how to protect and maintain your countertops. 7. Putting your store's name or your name on the page title is fine and standard practice when brand building. Some put it on the back as you do, some on the front and some not at all. If there is room, I put our store's name on the title, if not I leave it off. 8. If you're optimizing for local business, its fine to put your city, state or combination in the title. 9. I've got our store name and street address in the footer so it shows on every page. For pages I really want to kick butt locally on, I put the city, state in the title, otherwise I leave it off and let the footer do the work.
On-Page / Site Optimization | | AWCthreads0 -
Is it best to optimize your site for just one or two keywords?
Thanks guys. All of this is a big help. I believe what I've done is pretty close to what everyone is saying. I may need to add a few pages to the website and I'll be sure to add some posts optimized with extra terms.
On-Page / Site Optimization | | JAARON0 -
I think my site's HTML is good but I get 22 Invalid markup erros?
Joshua, In your section you have some errors and so cleaning them up will get your code valid. Here is what you have: At the end of each of these meta and link elements you need the closing / which is not there. So instead of ending them all with > you end them all with /> instead. That will fix a lot. Also, you have this in your head section which doesn't belong: Just delete it. You can't have a div in the head section. You also have a
On-Page / Site Optimization | | DanDeceuster0 -
How to move a site slowly
Thanks guys. I just moved the whole thing over yesterday using 301 redirects for all the pages. Did the change of address for google but I guess bing doesn't have this sort of thing?
Technical SEO Issues | | JAARON0