Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hey Arthur, Your CSS is not the issue here. None of your content is is hidden or "cloaked." You can see this when you disable CSS and JavaScript with the Web Developer plugin to get a sense of what the text crawler would see.  However the issue is definitely that the content is indeed thin and you're not offering anything beyond what can be found in the product specifications sheet on the manufacturers website. You should absolutely consider some more text-based content. You may consider having user generated content in allowing people to  comment on the differences between the two and what they like better. Responses would be inherently keyword-rich and the approach allows you to scale it across numerous pages. However the UX is very nice. Best of luck and let us know if you might be interested in sharing your progress. -Mike

We're not an aggregator of user reviews, we provide our own reviews. _For the review in question, I added the metadata to communicate the rating we gave to the camera: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/sony-rx100/sony-rx100A.HTM Specifically: All things considered, we think the Sony RX100 is an impressive achievement and we give it a rating of 5 out of 5 points, as well as an enthusiastic Dave's Pick.

In my experience, the only accurate tool is goole analytics (or other analytics software, of course). Webmaster tools is helpful for sitemap and crawling related issues, but I wouldn't trust the keywords section too much. This is even more the case for insights for search, these numbers are mostly usable to see trends, but not detailled analytics. You might want to use the google adwords tool instead, probably more reliable than the latter two: https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal Hope this helps!