Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Great thanks Aleyda
I have already done most of those things except for fetching as googlebot in gwt, which ill do next.
Please confirm then that theres no need to remove the old urls in GWT at any point and they should just 'fade away' ?
many thanks
dan
Many Thanks Aleyda for your detailed reply
In this case though its not a site migration just a redesign but thanks for your great info ill use for future reference when tackling any migrations
In the case of a redesign where the urls have been changed (and hence why set up the 301's) would you recommend after aproximately 2 weeks that you should 'fetch as google' in GWT the old page urls and then few days after that remove the old urls ? (or should they just disapear eventually ?)
Many Thanks
Dan
Many Thanks for your comments Dan !
So it doesnt matter that the feeds not going to be crawled, dont we want feeds to be crawled usually?
Blocking anything with a ? is surely good then isnt it since prevents all the dupe content etc one gets from search results ?
Yes my clients webmaster set it up
Hi
For an ecommerce site thats been developed via a combination of wordpress and magento and has yoast installed, will the sitemap (& other yoast features) map (& apply to) the entire site or just wordpress aspects ?
In other words does one need to do anything else to have a full sitemap for a combined magento/wordpress site or will Yoast cover it all ? This link seems to suggest should be fine but seeing if anyone else encountered this and had problems or if straightforward ?
http://fishpig.co.uk/wordpress-integration/docs/plugins.html
cheers
dan
Thanks Stufroguk,
1) does this still apply if the pages had no content - they were just overview pages/folders without any copy, links or authority hence why i think its ok to just remove urls without 301'ing ?
2) i do have other old content pages that i have 301'd to new replacement but hadnt planned to do anything else with them, but your saying after 2 weeks should nofollow or block them ? wont that stop the link equity passing ?
Cheers
Dan
Hi Dan
Yes please find below, please can you also confirm if the bottom 2 lines refer to blocking internal search results ?:
Disallow: /feed
Disallow: */feed
Disallow: /?
Disallow: /*?
Many Thanks
Dan
Hi
I have a few general misc questions re Robots.tx & GWT:
1) In the Robots.txt file what do the below lines block, internal search ?
Disallow: /?
Disallow: /*?
2) Also the sites feeds are blocked in robots.txt, why would you want to block a sites feeds ?
**3) **What's the best way to deal with the below:
- old removed page thats returning a 500 response code ?
- a soft 404 for an old removed page that has no current replacement
The old pages didn't have any authority or inbound links hence is it best/ok to simply create a url removal request in GWT ?
Cheers
Dan
Cheers Jesse,
its a wordpress blog attached to a magento ecommerce site
the blog already had yoast installed but will have a look at the settings again
the site search is part of magento so not sure how to address those
cheers
dan
Hi
Since adding blog to a site semoz is reporting increased duplicate content warning on seomoz crawl error tool such as:
/blog/category/easter
being a duplicate of
blog/2013/03
Does this type of dupe content matter ? If so how do you stop this ?
Also pages and pages of dupe content reported from internal/site search results, such as:
/catalogsearch/result/index/?q=mens+fashion
being a duplicate of
/catalogsearch/result/?q=mens+fashion
Does this matter need to be fixed or since internal site search not an issue and can just ignore, if it is an issue what do you need do to fix this type of dupe content ?
Cheers
Dan
It does help, thanks for making it clear Sam !!
All Best
Dan
Hi
How do SeoMoz reports deal with 'not provided' data
I see my total visits from organic search for a month are same as total of both my branded and non branded keyword traffic combined yet GA is reporting 157 visits from non provided data so is SEOMoz being very clever and finding a way to decipher this not provided data and allocate it accordingly in the reports ?
Or if not what ?
Many Thanks
Dan
Hi
Ive recently 301 redirected old pages/urls to new pages/urls due to a site redesign.
The seomoz kw report card is still reporting the old urls though with a significantly reduced score for most pages (i.e. from A's to now C's, from B to now D's etc).
Does this mean mozbot is following the 301's & its actually the new urls being graded as such or is it referring to the old pages ?
I will be adding the new urls to report card shortly but just interested in clarifying the above since i would have thought, if it is the old pages, they would not be reporting any score for those, or its scoring the new pages ?
Many Thanks
Dan
sorry 1 more question, i see that the webmaster has disallowed the feeds in the robots.txt file is this normal/desirable, i would have thought one would want rss feeds crawled by Google ?
Hi
I've recently set up a load of 301 redirects for a clients new site design/structure relaunch
One of the things we have done is take the kw out of the sub-category landing page url's since they now feature in the top level category page urls and don't want to risk over-optimisation by having kw repeats across the full urls. So the urls have changed and the original pages 301'd to the new current pages.
However If rankings start to drop & i decide to change urls again to include kw in final part of url too for the sub category landing pages, whats best way to manage the new redirects ?
Do i redirect the current urls (which have only been live for a week and have the original/old urls 301'd to them) to the new url's ? (worried this would create a chain of 301's which ive heard is not ideal)
Or just redirect the original urls to the new ones, and can forget about the current pages/url's since only been live for a week ?
(I presume best not since GWT sitemaps area says most new urls indexed now so I presume sees those as the original pages replacement now)
Or should they all be 301'd (original urls and current urls to the new) ?
Or best to just run with current set up and avoid making too many changes again, and setting up even more 301's after having just done so ?
Many Thanks 
Dan
Hi Kane
Thanks alot for answering and your helpful reply
We went with option 2 in the end. The original wasn't an option since the urls were being changed to include kw in the first level category pages anyway. I was worried if keeping kw in sub-category landing page url too would be overdoing it.
Option 1 would still be my preferred choice for my own sites/projects but this is for a client so didn't want to risk 'over optimisation'
Yes the 2 kw/pages are targeted by 2 different pages of unique content.
Many thanks
Dan