Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Well, you might have me on that. Back in the day of the original SEO Rockstars podcast with (ALL HAIL) Greg Boser (webguerrilla) and Todd Friesen (Oilman)  (circa 2005/6), I recall the order was believed/assumed to be by importance. I know that was a long time ago but I'd never seen anything subsequent to challenge that belief. But here's content from webmasterworld that counters that information. Personally, I was never a big JW fan or a big believer in her technical knowledge so take the information in that article as you may. Maybe someone here at Moz can chime in on this. Anyway, you may try the site:domain search operator in conjunction with a search term and that may give you the ordered list you're looking for. I'll leave it to you to determine whether that's true or not.

Hey, Thanks for reaching out to us! Unfortunately I am not sure if this will be on our roadmap for Link Explorer but If you're looking for unlinked mentions, though, I'd recommend Fresh Web Explorer! Its whole purpose is to find mentions of your site that aren't linked to, so you can reach out and hopefully get a link! You can read all about that tool over in our Help Hub pages, here: https://moz.com/help/guides/research-tools/fresh-web-explorer Eli

With Each redirect probably there is a 15% loss of link equity. Refer this for detail: - https://moz.com/blog/301-redirection-rules-for-seo

Unfortunately, I haven't seen any studies of that nature. I typically look at it pragmatically -- is there a change in SERP features related to that schema (i.e. is there direct, measurable benefit)? So far, I haven't seen any. On the other hand, I don't see any evidence of harm, as long as the schema is appropriate and well-structured. It just comes down to where you want to put your time/effort.