Ah, thanks all.
I think I'll rephrase my question to be - how do I get ALL of the referrers without having to click on the errors individually?
Anyone know?
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Ah, thanks all.
I think I'll rephrase my question to be - how do I get ALL of the referrers without having to click on the errors individually?
Anyone know?
Is there anyway to find referring pages for 404 errors in Google webmaster tools?
It used to be so easy to do before the redesign but does anyone know if Google are still sharing the data?
Just as an FYI - I've read and implemented this post - http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/liberating-your-data-from-google-webmaster-tools-a-step-by-step-guide .
I was really looking for examples but thanks for the response anyway.
By successfully I mean using it and getting everything crawled properly.
Does anyone have examples of e-commerce sites successfully using ajax to power faceted navigation?
Singular and plural are (more or less) synonymous.
Regarding your main question, I would try to make sure that there was no subtle difference in user intent that you might have missed.
To use the example that you give someone looking for "mountain bike training" might be more interested in formal training than someone looking for "mountain bike workshops" while someone seeking "mountain bike instruction" might only want to attend a single session . It might even be worth testing some theories out using PPC.
You could also consider branching off slightly from the keyword tool's suggestions. Again using the example you give you could create a page about mountain bike instructors - possibly optimising it to the term "mountain bike instruction", using it to write relevant content but with a significantly different angle to your other pages and also as a way to build relationships with the community of mountain bike instructors.
It's for a temporary fix for a page that has been poorly made in a CMS. The template for the page contains a malformed canonical element so we're trying to bandage it up by inserting some js that removes this element into the body of the page. Obviously if the canonical URL is crawled before the js can run then it's pointless even trying.
Do search engines (specifically Google) crawl the url in the canonical tag as it loads or do they load the whole page before crawling it?
Thanks,
Hi Guys,
If you have a baby of a domain which is only a few months old what should be the priorty for getting establish once all the on site stuff has been done?
I know the directories are not as important as they use to be but is there a top list that should be worked through steadly to get the new site setup on?
Kind regards
Singular and plural are (more or less) synonymous.
Regarding your main question, I would try to make sure that there was no subtle difference in user intent that you might have missed.
To use the example that you give someone looking for "mountain bike training" might be more interested in formal training than someone looking for "mountain bike workshops" while someone seeking "mountain bike instruction" might only want to attend a single session . It might even be worth testing some theories out using PPC.
You could also consider branching off slightly from the keyword tool's suggestions. Again using the example you give you could create a page about mountain bike instructors - possibly optimising it to the term "mountain bike instruction", using it to write relevant content but with a significantly different angle to your other pages and also as a way to build relationships with the community of mountain bike instructors.
2/18/2009 I wanted to establish if external links from Twitter hold any weighting. It is a well-known fact that Twitter uses rel = “no follow” on all external links, but do the search engines still cache these and consider them a vote?