Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Add http://www.me-by-melia.com/press/["/](http://thatsit.com.au/)>

this will tell the SE that no matter what the parameters give credit to http://www.me-by-melia.com/press/

Yes it would, every hop leaks link juice, bing will not pass link juice thought 2 hops at all.
http://thatsit.com.au/seo/reports/violation/the-redirection-response-results-in-another-redirection

As for .org and .com. it does not matter.

What does matter is how you handle googlebot when it comes to your site?

Youy should send googlebot along with USA users

Yes its ok, as long as they are different TLD'd

See Matt Cutts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ets7nHOV1Yo

i would suggest that you are more than likly not flaged, but the links have been found and discounted.

Yes you may still rank for long tails as there is less competition.

If you have been punkished for un-natural links, you more then likly get a message in GWMT

It may be fine by him, but its not fine according to google and bing.

Let me get the facts, can the user see this text?

if not, they you are cloaking, you are shopwing one thing to the Search Engine and another to the user

Ask yourself, why would someone read you press release?

Will they gain you links?

will they drive traffic?

My guess is that no one will read them, and the answer to the other 2 questions follows.

i would put my time and effort into somthing else

The reason it is not using your title is you have stuffed it with keywords

PUA Forums | The Attraction Forums | Free Men's Dating Forum | The Mystery Method: How to Get Beautiful Women into Bed

its 118 characters long, it should be 65 at most, google will not use such a title

somthing like

Free Men's Dating Forum | PUA Forums

would be better, remember its a title not a short story, just give the poeple an idea, dont try to give them a sales picth

google picks a description that matchs the query, it is hard to predict when it will use your description tag.

AWC hits it on the head, good content is the best way to do this, article posting and press releases are of limited value I would not waste my time.

You build trust by getting other trustworth sites to link to you, not article posting sites,

mozRank is a mesure of link popularity

Authority is more of a overiding metric, that predicts the chances of ranking, using the above metrics and others.

so how to get trust worthy sites to link to you? The end answer is good content, somthing you have they want to show to others. There is no easy short cut

I would not risk it, wouild be better to block in robots but i donrt really like that idea much either. A no index, follow tag is better of you can manage it.

I have not seen your urls or know the reason why you have the problem, but it is best of cause to avoid the problem in the first place.

yes it is, you are trying to game the system, it is also very easy for SE's to spot, you will end up with a un-natural link message from google in your GWT

Hotel comes under local business, there are examples onthis page

http://schema.org/LocalBusiness

here is hotel, but it is just the same as localbusiness and does not have examples, so use the examples from above link

http://schema.org/Hotel

Having marked up yourself as a hotel, you want to mark a product, like a room booking, then add an offer, with price, or AggregateOffer if you have aprice range

You can have a look at how i have marked up SEO as a product on this page

http://thatsit.com.au/perth/seo

This is what google supports at the moment

http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=99170

White hat.

Easy to get links have not worked for some time, and google is getting even more tighter on them.

Every product is different, but if you have a product that is cheap enouth, i would find all the magazines, blogs and websites in your area of busniess, and write to them, asking them if you send them a sample will they write a review. Works for me. A lot of people write for nothing, so a free pack of widgets is good enouth reason.

301's leak link juice so changing links would be better, but you have a point about gettuing too many links too quick. i would 301 them for now, and slowly change a few links each week.

i wouldent say to sit still and wait till the world revolves around you. There are ways to get quality links, they are harder to get, you go a long time without any, but when you do get them they are worth so much more.

Most sites are riddled with technical issues, getting prefect crawlability is a great head start over your compeditors.

Good content or a good product is teh key.

Its hard to sell what people dont want, this is true in any business, and it is hard online also. I am honest with my clients, I dont really want to sell what i cant sell, i look for clients that are under performing, that have somthing people want. i believe i can make a difference to peoples businesses, but i can work miracles.

Yes you will get a beneifit, but you are better off of cause pointing them to pages in your priamry site.

One wonders if you are worried about getting the links too quick, what sort of links are they?

If they are cheap links like article posting, comment spam, then i would spend the time doing something else.

If it is something of a bit better quaaliity like local or relevant directories, then i dont think you arte going to find too many links too fast as their are only so many local directoies.

If they are quality links i would point them at my primary web site, i find it hard to believe that you are finding quailuity links too fast.

If they are any sort of scam, then i would avice not to do it.

It is bad SEO, as artcile sites are worthless, but i dount you are going to get floged over it, just that the links wont count.

As Kevin said, make sure you have some good links also.

If a link is easy to get, it is proabably worthless.

Yes as far as google goes you can cross domain canonical, Bing Toolkit picks it up as a violation, but i have heard from somone on this group that they were told by a Bing employee that they have since changed the way the handle them, and now also allow cross domain canonicals

So the answer is yes.

Thats what i have done, but i dont want to sit and wait, I would like to know if it works.

Cant seem to find much on the internet about it.

My fgirst thoughts were that it would work, but maybe google worries you will just remove the rules after penalty is lifted.

Robs link is for IIS6, it is more likly you have IIS7, it is much easier you do redirects with IIS7, here a link for IIS7

http://thatsit.com.au/seo/tutorials

It should still work, but the fact that it is off topic is not good. A lot of people get this wrong, its not the the page the link was pr3eviously pointing at that should be relevant, but the page that the link comes from. are the links comming from relevant pages? is the link text relevant?