The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Local Listings
    4. Is this a NAP inconsistency or is it fine?

    Is this a NAP inconsistency or is it fine?

    Local Listings
    15 4 537
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • KempRugeLawGroup
      KempRugeLawGroup @WilliamKammer last edited by

      Did the googler happen to mention what's better between blvd and boulevard? I was told by some people on here, that it's best to write everything out just to be absolutely clear, but I'm not sure if there's any real evidence of a difference there.

      That is a really good point about "Bing or Google?" I was looking for a "cake and eat it, too" scenario, but, you're definitely right about, if I have to choose, I'll choose Google.

      • Ruben
      WilliamKammer 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • vmialik
        vmialik last edited by

        Hi Ruben,

        With citations, you always start with matching the address with your local post office, like USPS uses. This is important for things such as the difference between using Ste or Suite for names, St vs Street, etc. Google tends to honor the decisions of your local post office.

        Pertaining to the zip code, 5 digit zip code is still the king for consistency. Main reason being is that most places still allow only 5 digits for zip code vs 9 digits.  One camp may say well 5 + 4 is still consistent but gives extra location info, but I haven't seen any local benefit for "+4" other than the fact that it helps with identification for the local post office. But in terms of local SEO NAP consistency trumps in my opinion, and I totally agree with William on both accounts.

        If you can opt out of leaving +4 I would do so. When it comes to adding your zip code on Google it gives you an example of 5 digits, even though it gives you a link to the USPS site which will give you 9 digits. And I would match Googles NAP. You should not be penalized for this on Bing end, if you choose to leave this out. Can you be penalized if you leave the +4 in? Maybe (due to inconsistency) but most likely not.

        Hope this helps!

        KempRugeLawGroup 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • WilliamKammer
          WilliamKammer @KempRugeLawGroup last edited by

          The Googler said it didn't matter as long as it was consistent, but I think Vadim has some good points below.

          vmialik 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • vmialik
            vmialik @WilliamKammer last edited by

            Awesome William, its great to have a Googler input in these discussions 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • KempRugeLawGroup
              KempRugeLawGroup @vmialik last edited by

              Ste vs suite is interesting. I talked about it with Miriam Ellis on this thread. In my neck of the wood searches, ste, suite, etc has all been replaced with #.

              vmialik 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • KempRugeLawGroup
                KempRugeLawGroup last edited by

                Thanks for the tips, you two! I appreciate it!

                • Ruben
                vmialik 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • vmialik
                  vmialik @KempRugeLawGroup last edited by

                  True Google switched to # for Ste. I think fairly recently. I think Yelp still uses Ste.  🙂

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • vmialik
                    vmialik @KempRugeLawGroup last edited by

                    Great Question!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • MiriamEllis
                      MiriamEllis last edited by

                      Hi Ruben,

                      Good discussion going on here! I'm totally fascinated that Bing wants you to add a Zip+4 code. This is the first time I've heard of this in the local sphere. Zip+4 was launched by the USPS in 1983 as a way to help mail carriers identify a certain segment within a neighborhood. They are generally not required for mail delivery anymore, except in the case of post office boxes, which are, of course, not allowable addresses in a local search campaign. Very curious as to why Bing would require this.

                      At any rate, presumably Google is aware of Zip+4 codes, so I wouldn't actually consider them a candidate for true NAP inconsistency. If some of your listings featured a suite number, and others didn't, then that would be a problem, but I don't see Google having any confusion between a 5 digit zip and a Zip+4. I'm sure they understand this system, so I wouldn't be concerned about it if Bing insists. If you can leave it off and still get your Bing Places listing published, it's fine to do so, too.

                      Glad you brought this up. Like I've said, it's the first time I've heard of any local platform requiring a +4 code.

                      KempRugeLawGroup 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • KempRugeLawGroup
                        KempRugeLawGroup @MiriamEllis last edited by

                        Let me clarify 'requiring." I created a fake listing with a screenshot, so you can see exactly what pops up with Bing if you don't add the +4. As you can see, you don't have to do it, you can override it, but the Bing Places chat people encourage you not to for whatever reason. And, the prompt encourages you to add the +4, too.

                        [](<a href=)" target="_blank">a> [IMG]]([IMG]http://i.imgur.com/3yufOxE.jpg[/IMG]) [URL]]([URL=http://imgur.com/3yufOxE][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/3yufOxE.jpg[/IMG][/URL]) 3yufOxE

                        KempRugeLawGroup 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • KempRugeLawGroup
                          KempRugeLawGroup @KempRugeLawGroup last edited by

                          The last screenshot picture, actually worked. Something else, I just noticed, when Bing wants you add the +4, they also want you to change to abbreviations. At least, they did for this one I just made in the screenshot above. Now, that could definitely be a problem.

                          • Ruben
                          vmialik 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • vmialik
                            vmialik @KempRugeLawGroup last edited by

                            Hi Ruben,

                            At this point, even though they encourage you still have an option to override their suggestions and go with want you prefer? If that's correct you should be good to go. Unless they make it a requirement. But thanks for filling us in!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • MiriamEllis
                              MiriamEllis last edited by

                              Thank you for the screen shots, Ruben. At any rate, none of these things should affect NAP consistency, so fortunately, not something to be worried about.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1 / 1
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              • Call Rail and NAP
                                lfrazer123
                                lfrazer123
                                0
                                3
                                117

                              • META Descriptions and NAPs
                                KempRugeLawGroup
                                KempRugeLawGroup
                                0
                                5
                                114

                              • Does business name capitalisation count when making sure you have the same NAP across all directories ?
                                DonnaDuncan
                                DonnaDuncan
                                0
                                3
                                246

                              • NAP Questions
                                MiriamEllis
                                MiriamEllis
                                0
                                3
                                103

                              • Is there any harm to display NAP more than once on a location page ?
                                MiriamEllis
                                MiriamEllis
                                0
                                6
                                163

                              • Question about onsite NAP as it relates to Local Search
                                MiriamEllis
                                MiriamEllis
                                0
                                5
                                171

                              • Cleaning up inconsistent citations
                                ThompsonPaul
                                ThompsonPaul
                                0
                                4
                                254

                              • Would having 3 locations NAP in footer of site hurt?
                                MiriamEllis
                                MiriamEllis
                                0
                                6
                                461

                              Get started with Moz Pro!

                              Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                              Start my free trial
                              Products
                              • Moz Pro
                              • Moz Local
                              • Moz API
                              • Moz Data
                              • STAT
                              • Product Updates
                              Moz Solutions
                              • SMB Solutions
                              • Agency Solutions
                              • Enterprise Solutions
                              • Digital Marketers
                              Free SEO Tools
                              • Domain Authority Checker
                              • Link Explorer
                              • Keyword Explorer
                              • Competitive Research
                              • Brand Authority Checker
                              • Local Citation Checker
                              • MozBar Extension
                              • MozCast
                              Resources
                              • Blog
                              • SEO Learning Center
                              • Help Hub
                              • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                              • How-to Guides
                              • Moz Academy
                              • API Docs
                              About Moz
                              • About
                              • Team
                              • Careers
                              • Contact
                              Why Moz
                              • Case Studies
                              • Testimonials
                              Get Involved
                              • Become an Affiliate
                              • MozCon
                              • Webinars
                              • Practical Marketer Series
                              • MozPod
                              Connect with us

                              Contact the Help team

                              Join our newsletter
                              Moz logo
                              © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                              • Accessibility
                              • Terms of Use
                              • Privacy