Private Question Shutdown
-
1st off I think this is kind of bittersweet. I definitely understand from the questions I've asked myself that they must take time to actually answer and all the answers of them spectacular.
I will dearly miss this part of SEOmoz and want to propose 2 possible solutions. This is just my $.02 feedback
Now is a business growing to 20,000 members 1st off I to excellent job everybody at SEOmoz
secondly obviously there are is the 4% of us who still would like to have access to private questions.
So I suggest these 4 things
A) either open it up to the next stage up to hundred dollar month plan only
B) or pay per question ( however to not change the limit)
I feel I know the answer to why both A and B would be a real challenge SEOmoz does not accept anybody off the street and just give them the teacher spoke and say hey your Qualified I believe it is very hard for SEOmoz to have the staff of the caliber that they have.
C) Distilled is still a outstanding consulting firm. And I know they answer tons of private questions all associates do. Would it be a possibility or am I just asking the same thing as I did before of putting the burden on the company that does technically still specialize in consulting distilled pay them X amount and make a profit or $200 plan up and distilled answers only.
D)You can make it so we can ask private questions once every 2 to 3 months? it would lighten the load may be a combination of everything suggested with some other people's suggestions. Everyone hears bright else think of some ideas to save something and if it can't work well at least we tried.
Now I'm saying this just because I would love to still keep this feature however I think distilled is in the same boat as far as needing beyond outstanding employees and frankly there is a shortage of people that can give the type of advice we've been getting. That said distilled is a consulting firm block off hours from them figure out the price based on the time it's taken to answer last year's results and give us a choice to purchase them or not.
I'm just trying to think of a plan but I will understand either way I have learned so much and am so grateful for all the wonderful people and advice private and public at SEOmoz I have NO intention of ever canceling my subscription over something like this because I know for a fact these guys are swamped with questions.
I can also understand Rand wanting his staff to be able to run the company the fact that less than 4% of us actually use private questions is a number I would've never guessed I would've said 50%. Regardless what happens to SEOmoz if it did become 30% and 45% than 75% the company could not be run as it is run today would all get less out of SEOmoz
"Just for those who may be curious - we've got about 19,000 paying PRO members today, of which <4% have ever used private Q+A, yet it was a huge detractor from the time our staff and contractors could help with public Q+A and other projects, hence the decision to remove."
I want to say something it's really important not to come down on the staff of SEOmoz there partners and affiliates and everyone who's been doing whoring to everyone a fantastic job of answering questions think about how hard it is to give advice that literally knocks your socks off I have been passed to 3 different people for one question because they want to give me the person that specialized in what I was asking about that is 1st class service so being Moz instead of wherever other company they're actually being transparent telling us why and they're actually listening to us speak so if it's a reasonable idea I would say don't get mad get creative movie can all find a happy medium. Where people don't pay would still get one question a year something like that.
If anyone can think of better ideas than I can would jump certain this community can for once let's help SEOmoz with a tough question their facing where they have essentially made but I'm certain if we could find something that they actually liked him not to say where it is because I don't know what they'd say yes to but something that they would say yes to then well we would have to get a yes because it would be something they liked and said yes to.
I don't mean to ask people to come up with crazy ideas or threats I don't think even the people that believe this is a deal breaker can turn your back on the people that have given you valuable advice for quite a bit of time spending on who you are obviously.
I've seen a lot more Associates, staff and guru's in public Q&A however it seems they get swamped even their which brings me back to fighting against my own point that we are a bunch of star F'ers the guy with the most knowledge to somebody like myself who actually enjoys doing this is someone to look up to and aspire to be like. You think that's weird kids collect baseball cards all the time as to adults why because of their ability to do something extraordinary that they find amazing and helpful ( maybe not baseball cards unless you're selling them)
if I can ask Rand & the entire staff along with affiliates and partners please at least look over some of the suggestions I've made and if any of them even have a flicker of hope maybe we can work something out where that spark of ingenuity is lit and the solution is possible.
Thank you all for listening to my long request and I appreciate everyone's time. But to the community let's think of ideas guys: don't waste time complaining they're not going to reverse it over that I don't believe.
To SEOmoz my next 3 questions are going to be kind of complex but relevant one doing. Let's hope we can all work together to make it so we can all get her 4th question.
Thanks again for listening
sincerely
Thomas Zickell
-
Hey All
I have been a pro member for a while and spent a fair bit of time in the public Q&A and have also asked a few private questions. Now, whilst the answers I got to my private questions were solid enough, I have had much more value from the public Q&A and the quality of the answers at times can be truly inspiring.
I would argue that public Q&A provides a better experience on every level
- Answers from a wide range of experts
- Speed of response
- Multiple opinions
- open discussion from a range of experts which pushes them towards an improved and collaborative answer
You can basically get a round table with a bunch of active, experienced SEO consultants who are in the trenches, day in, day out dealing with the kind of problems that you are having. The price you would pay to get a sit down with the same consultants that you can have providing guidance and an open discussion of how to best deal with your problem or what strategy to employ, well, the value is clear for all to see.
If the SEOMoz staff also become more active in these discussions then that provides even more weight to the 'expert' factor and hopefully, provides a useful resource for other folks with the same problem.
For me, to get an answer from one expert, no matter the caliber does not compare to getting an open discussion from several experts who are all working towards the best possible solution to your problem. Likewise, I have learned a lot from my time in Q&A and having a platform to debate issues with a range of my peers in the industry is highly valuable.
The only real issue here as I see it is the loss of the ability to share sensitive information but really, you can get around that with solid examples and if the problem is so complex that is not suitable then really, PRO Q&A was not really going to be the best option and private consulting would be a better fit. If that is the case, and you have asked your question in public Q&A and likely spoken with several consultants who now understand your problem so finding someone to help you should also be further simplified.
Additionally, I think you will find that this business attracts a lot of troubleshooting minds, and a lot of good charity so if you are really struggling, and have a truly sensitive issue, folks will probably help you in private and certainly to the same level you would have gotten from a Pro Q&A session.
For all of those that are upset, I would urge you to spend some time in public Q&A and see if the quality of the answers and range of the folks helping out there will not make you change your mind and realise that was always the better option anyway.
Cheers
Marcus
-
what you just said is true if you did bring up a competitor's name or if you brought up some new ideas that you think is going to revolutionize search engine optimization.
"The value was the asking of a private, sometimes strategic, question and the development of an answer that could lead to an advantage over a competitor."
However in no way shape or form is this the real case for only private questions this could easily be the exact same thing with a public question there are no NDA's being signed prior to a public or private question meaning if the person answering your question thinks their answer is relevant to somebody else's problem they will most likely give them the answer that worked rather be private or public they want to do the right thing.
I'm not attacking your stance on not wanting to lose private it is a special thing however we can't ask everyone associated with this company to spend their extra time answering our questions without compensating them more than we compensate them now.
Respectfully,
Thomas
-
First of all, I think SEOmoz team took decision after long time planning, and although it is a hard decision in long term it will pay back to the community. Now we will have even more people answering in the public Q/A section and helping to deliver faster responses there.
For those who said that they will miss private Q/A, I think there will be mozzers (and friends from the SEOmoz community) out there who you will be able to private message from time to time to discuss about the latest strategy ideas (and once again, I don't think anyone will refuse to discuss it with you).
Last and not least: as part of the community our job is to support them in order to get supported by them, so let us behave like that!
Istvan
-
Hi Marcus,
I agree with what you're saying about essentially the table of your peers it would cost probably $1000 a question to realistically get the people you do here in public Q&A to surround and answer your questions.
I think public and private are 2 very different things people plan for private and use it for things that cannot somehow had the wrong answer because there is this might hinge on whatever it is they're asking. I do agree you can ask things that you would not want to ask in public maybe they can set up a PM system You get X amount of private messages related to your public Q&A the downside is the public does not get to learn from it and that's a lot of what poet Q&A is.
I think the ability to have each was a great synergy and I can't wait for somebody to ask in a private question "how do we get private questions back on seomoz" hopefully no one will waste their time doing it. But when you look at the tools, community, staff, combination of advice and software is seen nowhere else on such a scale so regardless of what happens I will still be happy with seomoz I definitely don't think that them giving things away to people takes away from us that pay obviously if we were getting nothing more it would not be very fair however that is so far from the case I believe you are right when you say if someone's in a true jam the staff will help out I hope they will however been assumed that not anything more.
Thumbs up good response man
sincerely,
Tom
-
Sorry if this has been answered already. What will happen to the questions that are already private? Will they now become public?
-
Hi Keri,
That is a shame but as many of the other Pro Members have commented it's not a deal breaker. Dr Pete used to answer most of my questions so I'll miss him dearly but the the public Q&A is sufficient for most cases.
Can I ask is the Public Q&A open for indexation by Google or do you need to be cookied in to read the questions? I'm trying to understand if Google alerts or clients searching for their site will pick up questions about them when mentioned? It's always great to get another opinion on certain subjects but of course some clients may not want their indexation issues or site crawling issues 'out there' for everyone to see.
Thanks
Bush
-
Cheers Tom
I have asked a few sensitive questions, but as it goes, the responses were never able to solve the problem, it was almost helping with a crisis of confidence or direction really rather than an out and out solution. In the end, I stopped asking private questions as I just got more from public Q&A.
It's a shame I guess and I do get it but if folks need private consultation they are going to have to get private consultation now I guess.
Have a good one!
Marcus -
That's a real shame, but it makes sense.
-
Hi Marcus,
you are right when it comes down to it if you have a real project that you have to get done there's no substitute for hiring a individual, firm or combination I have had great luck with companies like distilled, Portant, evolving SEO and skyrocketseo. For a real project one question will help but it will not answer everything that needs to be answered or assist you with a lot of the work.
I can understand if you're under a lot of pressure and that private question has to be right and you need it yesterday why that would out a lot of stress. I do agree questions get answered much quicker and public then private however I do think it's like the lottery with public and you're right sometimes you get it right off the bat sometimes you have to wait with that as well. I don't understand how we will have more people in public when 4% of us were using a private but I could be very wrong because I'm assuming the private questions were much more complex and time-consuming.
All the best,
Tom
-
The Private Q&A has probably been the most valuable aspect of SEOmoz PRO for me. I've asked 8 questions in 17 months but each question has contained details that can't be divulged publicly, and that would have been really difficult (impossible in some cases) to phrase or receive answers to in a public forum, without giving sensitive information away. It is a huge disappointment for me and the company I work for - I would say it might be a deal breaker in our case
- but I understand why you've done it - it makes sense from your point-of-view, and the public forum does seem neglected at times in terms of endorsing answers.If 4% of your paying subscribers have used Private Q&A, how many use the Q&A in general?
Does anyone know of any alternatives, for someone who doesn't want a full on consulting contract, but would have occasional important questions?
-
What is the Timeframe?
You'll still be able to ask private questions through March 15th, meaning all PRO members will have at least two more chances (February and March) to ask a private question. You'll also be able to see all of your old questions in your account through at least the end of March. We encourage you to save a copy of these questions for your future reference. -
Public Q&A is indexed by the search engines.
-
Thanks Alex,
Your question from earlier is interesting regarding a similar service for private Q&A. A pay per question service would be welcomed as drilling down on clients issues privately is very important. I'd happily pay more or pay per question on certain issues.
Cheers
B
-
But that doesn't say what happens after March. Do we assume they are deleted?
-
Public is still public.
That's exactly the point.
@SEOmoz - at least be honest about it and say what we all know. The time/value does not match for your side of the qa.
-
We would never, ever make the questions public. We will keep the private questions available to you as long as we can, but at some point they will be removed from our system.
-
We are recent members. In 4 months used only once and would like to continue using. I believe that the main difference from private to public QA is the comfort in moving some data.
We hope that decision came to the best of all members, having most intense discussion and the same quality of the private QA.
-
I wish you would reconsider the decision or at least adjust as I suggest below.
Having private Q&A is much different in my mind than public Q&A.
The logic/argument that making it all public helps everyone misses the point of private Q&A entirely. Those that choose to use private Q&A do so precisely because they do not want their questions public. Why is that? For me, there is almost always specific mention of URLs in my questions. Not only do we not want to raise red flags and reveal issues for potential COMPETITORS to find, we often do not want CLIENTS to be aware of the conversation as we work to resolve issues or make changes to improve performance.
The other reason I like the Private Q&A is that the quality of private answers is simply higher and more reliable in our experience. Having a fallback resource has been a great comfort when we step out of our areas of expertise. Losing that is a negative, no doubt.
ONE WAY TO LESSEN THE EXPOSURE OF A QUESTION THAT NOW MUST BE PUBLIC (but that we do not wish to be public) would be to add in an optional check box that disallows indexation by the search engines. That way, it at least makes it harder for those outside seomoz.org to discover the conversation.
-
" what you just said is true if you did bring up a competitor's name"
Yes, exactly The big value in private is being able to ask questions with detailed competitive information. For example, asking a question about why our competitor ranks for a specific term, but we don't, even though we think we should.
i understand the scalability challenge with this (I have a payroll to make myself...), I'm just surprised that this wasn't anticipated as a potential issue when first offered. It wouldn't have been hard to calculate the cost/time of providing this service long term.
-
0665
-
13177
-
04289
-
05297
-
24598
-
041.1k
-
261.3k