The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4. Rel="prev" and rel="next" implementation

    Rel="prev" and rel="next" implementation

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4 4 897
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • dan_panait
      dan_panait last edited by

      Hi there

      since I've started using semoz I have a problem with duplicate content so I have implemented on all the pages with pagination rel="prev" and rel="next" in order to reduce the number of errors but i do something wrong and now I can't figure out what it is.

      the main page url is : alegesanatos.ro/ingrediente/

      and for the other pages :

      alegesanatos.ro/ingrediente/p2/ - for page 2

      alegesanatos.ro/ingrediente/p3/ - for page 3 and so on.

      We've implemented rel="prev" and rel="next" according to google webmaster guidelines without adding canonical tag or base link in the header section and we still get duplicate meta title error messages for this pages.

      Do you think there is a problem because we create another url for each page instead of adding parameters (?page=2 or ?page=3 ) to the main url

      alegesanatos.ro/ingrediente?page=2

      thanks

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Adam.Whittles
        Adam.Whittles last edited by

        Using rel=prev and rel=next will help to avoid duplicate content issues and is entirely separate from your meta tags. If you wish to avoid duplicate meta title errors then you will need to add 'page x' to your titles, similar to what Matt Cutts has done with his blog.

        Hope that helps,

        Adam.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Klarke
          Klarke last edited by

          Adding rel=next/rel=prev, will not fix issues with Duplicate Titles.  You need to edit your templates so that paginated pages actually have unique titles.  For example

          Ingrediente - Page 1 of 5

          Ingrediente - Page 2 of 5

          Ingrediente - Page 3 of 5

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Dr-Pete
            Dr-Pete last edited by

            Technically, rel=prev/next doesn't de-duplicate the way the canonical tag does, but it should solve any problems for Google. I don't believe we currently consider rel=prev/next when determining duplicate titles. Klarke is right - you could just give those pages semi-unique titles. We're not handling rel=prev/next as well as we could be (it turns out to be a tricky tag to parse well).

            Looking at your pages, your implementation appears to be correct. My gut reaction is that your probably ok here. You're doing what Google claims they want (at least what they want this week).

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • 1 / 1
            • First post
              Last post
            • I have implemented rel = "next" and rel = "prev" but google console is picking up pages as being duplicate. Can anyone tell me what is going on?
              Maayboli
              Maayboli
              0
              2
              85

            • Pagination with rel=“next” and rel=“prev”
              netzkern_AG
              netzkern_AG
              0
              3
              522

            • Whats the best way to implement rel = “next/prev” if we have filters?
              DirkC
              DirkC
              0
              4
              275

            • Pages with rel "next"/"prev" still crawling as duplicate?
              KeriMorgret
              KeriMorgret
              0
              3
              655

            • Canonical and Rel=next/prev Implementation
              Martijn_Scheijbeler
              Martijn_Scheijbeler
              0
              3
              151

            • Rel="canonical" and rel="alternate" both necessary?
              Dr-Pete
              Dr-Pete
              0
              10
              9.3k

            • Pagination with rel=“next” and rel=“prev”
              sichristie
              sichristie
              0
              2
              629

            • Rel="prev" and view all question
              irvingw
              irvingw
              0
              2
              661

            Get started with Moz Pro!

            Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

            Start my free trial
            Products
            • Moz Pro
            • Moz Local
            • Moz API
            • Moz Data
            • STAT
            • Product Updates
            Moz Solutions
            • SMB Solutions
            • Agency Solutions
            • Enterprise Solutions
            • Digital Marketers
            Free SEO Tools
            • Domain Authority Checker
            • Link Explorer
            • Keyword Explorer
            • Competitive Research
            • Brand Authority Checker
            • Local Citation Checker
            • MozBar Extension
            • MozCast
            Resources
            • Blog
            • SEO Learning Center
            • Help Hub
            • Beginner's Guide to SEO
            • How-to Guides
            • Moz Academy
            • API Docs
            About Moz
            • About
            • Team
            • Careers
            • Contact
            Why Moz
            • Case Studies
            • Testimonials
            Get Involved
            • Become an Affiliate
            • MozCon
            • Webinars
            • Practical Marketer Series
            • MozPod
            Connect with us

            Contact the Help team

            Join our newsletter
            Moz logo
            © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
            • Accessibility
            • Terms of Use
            • Privacy