Separating words in URLS using hyphens vs. "no separator"

[Webdannmark]

If you already have a big structure running on a "no-separation" setup don't change it. The upside will not outweigh the potential disruption you cause. Do it for your new pages only.

[Dan-Petrovic]

Exactly - Don't touch it. Start with new pages and you'll be fine. Even Google admits that 301 may not always pass all the goodness across.

[ThomasHgenhaven]

Well. It's a lot of work and entails some risk to redirect many files. That being said, I have redirected thousands of URLs over the last couple of years and have yet to see it fail.

While it is a lot of work to change many URLs, I really appreciate consistency on a website, and prefer all URLs to follow the same structure. So I would probably redirect all the URLs.

I suppose you are working with the Bruel & Kjær website - and I can see there are several types of URLs now - no hyphens and with space as a separator. Adding yet another type of URLs will be at least somewhat confusing.

[AaronSchinke]

Awesome. Love seeing real world examples.

[clolsen]

Agree - this is the issue. Especially the "space" separators definately needs fixing, so the question here is related to deciding the new strategy on this.

• thanks for taking the time to check it out :-).

[ThomasHgenhaven]

I know many people disagree with me on this one, but I would go big and get it fixed once and for all. The problem is only going to be worse when you get more content on the website.

Good luck with the work!

[BlinkWeb]

lets not forget - therapist.com

[Dan-Petrovic]

Suggested title tag:therapist: You need it if you can't read it.

[TheEspresseo]

This makes me wonder whether one can ever get extra mileage out of word merging, for SEO or branding purposes. keyphraSEOlogy.com sticks out in my mind...

[zealmedia]

Love those examples, brightened up a Tuesday morninig.