Site Architecture: Cross Linking vs. Siloing

[dignan99]

I found a relatively "ghetto" approach to silo using wordpress, since I don't have the time or technical skill to implement it perfectly.  Using a specific plugin, it will compare posts and reference a set number of related at the bottom, creating a link structure similar to a silo.  It's not perfect but it is easy.

[AlanBleiweiss]

exactly.  "Tags" and "materials" are not exactly top level category stuff

[DonnieCooper]

Anyone have anything else they'd like to toss into the discussion?

Any examples you'd like to share of detail page linking vs. silos?

[edit] Just found this (old) blog post by Google about the importance of (internal) link architecture... I quote:

Q: Let's say my website is about my favorite hobbies: biking and camping. Should I keep my internal linking architecture "themed" and not cross-link between the two?

A: We haven't found a case where a webmaster would benefit by intentionally "theming" their link architecture for search engines. And, keep-in-mind, if a visitor to one part of your site can't easily reach other parts of your site, that may be a problem for search engines as well.

[toddmumford]

I agree with Alan, and would like to add that I believe that using the silo method can increase the proximity of closely connected clusters of keywords better. In other words, by nature, in a silo structure, tightly knit keywords support each other and pass theme and relevance value to each other by default when a strong supportive breadcrumb is in place. Often with a flat site architecture extra programming needs to be done to establish those relationships as they relate to internal pages.

[DonnieCooper]

Hey Todd, thanks.

While I definitely agree about having tightly themed categories, I'm not quite sure I am sold on using a silo. Correct me if I'm wrong here please, but isn't a silo when you don't cross link detail pages (within the same category) with each other? I think Alan feels the same way, or perhaps I've misunderstood.

Check this post about the importance of link architecture by Google. Specifically, the last Q&A.

[helpwanted]

Hi Alan...

Is there a case study -- where a silo is broken down  and analyzed that I can use to understand this siloing concept !

My understanding of A Silo is -- you for example if you have a grocery store website - you create a dairy section then all related dairy products are found here and a deli dept then all cold cuts in this section  etcc where all the pages are themed from the top then on downward, and trying to keep the silo 3 clicks from home

The breadcrumb -- not sure how this comes into play but if I keep the site 3 clicks from home at any time someone needs to get back to where they started from they are able to do it, so how does the breadcrumb help if I am already trying to keep the structure a 3 click structure for easy navigation and easy exit back to beginning.

[AlanBleiweiss]

the breadcrumb is one more signal about where you are in the process, on the site, in the section.  Google also likes them and will often show the breadcrumb navigation links right in search results.  They try to emulate breadcrumbs sometimes in search results if you don't have them, but if they do, since you're not feeding them an actual breadcrumb, theirs can sometimes guess wrong at the keywords they show in them.

[SystemIDBarcodes]

I am confused. So lets that I have an ecommerce site that has 20 types(books, toys…) / 20 categories each / 20 subcategories each and thousands of products under each subcategory.

When we say go flat, is it ideal to go all the way like http://www.website.com/type (20 of these), and http://www.website.com/category (400 of these) and http://www.webiste.com/subcategory (8000 of these)and thousands of product pages. So there is no page more than  1 directory level down. Does this mean flat architecture?