Meta descriptions

[krissy-cca]

Sorry for double-post! ha

[vibelingo]

hi, thanks! The meta description is based on kw research and on page content so relevancy cannot be the issue. Probably they are not using meta-robots and they need to place the code you suggested...?

[vibelingo]

hi, thanks but the search to test this was with using the same keywords used for the title-tag and in the meta description and on-site content, so I'm ruling out lack of relevancy here.

[StalkerB]

The code I've suggested will only help if it's pulling the description from DMOZ or the Yahoo Directory. Do you have a listing in either? If so is it the same as what is showing?

Even if you do have a listing it doesn't necessarily mean that's where it's getting it from.

As I say, if you've just made the change, wait for a week or so and if your description is long then make it fit into a normal SERPs length snippet.

However it may be that you can't actually do anything to change Google's mind on what it shows for that search term (you may also find the snippet is different depending on what is searched for).

[krissy-cca]

Can you post us the URL or is it confidential? It'd be nice to have a look

[StalkerB]

Hi Damien,

Not a double post just because I got there first

Would always encourage people to chime in with their own opinions even if it just confirms what was said.

It can help the asker know if an answer is good advice or not

[vibelingo]

hi, I'd have to check with the client, but anyway it is in Norwegian so it would probably not help you much! But, the pages in question are not thin on content and are decisively on-topic.

[vibelingo]

Hi, there is a DMOZ listing so I could check that, thanks!

[StalkerB]

Det kan hjelpe

But yeah, if it's a decent description (and you seem to be happy with it) I'd look elsewhere for problems first.

[AaronSchinke]

True. I've even seem some instances of anchor text being used in descriptions.