The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Technical SEO Issues
    4. Getting rid of duplicate content with rel=canonical

    Getting rid of duplicate content with rel=canonical

    Technical SEO Issues
    4 3 758
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • RiceMedia
      RiceMedia last edited by

      This may sound like a stupid question, however it's important that I get this 100% straight.

      A new client has nearly 6k duplicate page titles / descriptions.  To cut a long story short, this is mostly the same page (or rather a set of pages), however every time Google visits these pages they get a different URL.  Hence the astronomical number of duplicate page titles and descriptions.

      Now the easiest way to fix this looks like canonical linking.  However, I want to be absolutely 100% sure that Google will then recognise that there is no duplicate content on the site.  Ideally I'd like to 301 but the developers say this isn't possible, so I'm really hoping the canonical will do the job.

      Thanks.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Theo-NL
        Theo-NL last edited by

        To me this sounds like a clear-cut case of a need for the canonical tag.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • iPhilo
          iPhilo last edited by

          Hi mj1984,

          The canonical tag is your only option here. The problem with duplicate content is really about control:

          (i) Controlling Link Juice (past + future)

          (ii) Controlling the targeted landing page within your campaign

          Google will devalue certain identical pages, but they will always favour one. They do not, as far as I am aware, devalue all content that is duplicated (including the original) - So your concern isn't that your site is being devalued, simpliciter (often an immediate unwarranted concern). It is that Google will select one duplicate page and favour that above the others.

          The canonical tag exists for you to control this.

          So, will Google recognise there is no duplicate content?. It should, it might not, but I wouldn't worry about this. For the canonical tags that it does pick up (& eventually) - you can be confident that the page you want to rank, will be the one ranking.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • RiceMedia
            RiceMedia last edited by

            Thank you both, much appreciated.  Their rankings have suffered in the last two weeks and this coincides with their developers creating all this duplicate content - let's see if this fixes that issue!

            Thanks again.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • 1 / 1
            • First post
              Last post
            • "Yet-to-be-translated" Duplicate Content: is rel='canonical' the answer?
              Martijn_Scheijbeler
              Martijn_Scheijbeler
              0
              2
              103

            • After I 301 redirect duplicate pages to my rel=canonical page, do I need to add any tags or code to the non canonical pages?
              Mike.Goracke
              Mike.Goracke
              0
              2
              125

            • Rel=canonical overkill on duplicate content?
              AlanBleiweiss
              AlanBleiweiss
              0
              2
              173

            • Why am I getting rel= canonical?
              ThompsonPaul
              ThompsonPaul
              0
              3
              320

            • Duplicate Page Content / Rel Canonical
              Joseph-Green-SEO
              Joseph-Green-SEO
              0
              13
              349

            • ECWID How to fix Duplicate page content.. rel canonical tag or robot txt
              UnderRugSwept
              UnderRugSwept
              0
              2
              474

            • How do I get rid of duplicate content
              JustinTaylor88
              JustinTaylor88
              0
              2
              568

            • ECommerce products duplicate content issues - is rel="canonical" the answer?
              timhatton
              timhatton
              0
              7
              844

            Get started with Moz Pro!

            Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

            Start my free trial
            Products
            • Moz Pro
            • Moz Local
            • Moz API
            • Moz Data
            • STAT
            • Product Updates
            Moz Solutions
            • SMB Solutions
            • Agency Solutions
            • Enterprise Solutions
            • Digital Marketers
            Free SEO Tools
            • Domain Authority Checker
            • Link Explorer
            • Keyword Explorer
            • Competitive Research
            • Brand Authority Checker
            • Local Citation Checker
            • MozBar Extension
            • MozCast
            Resources
            • Blog
            • SEO Learning Center
            • Help Hub
            • Beginner's Guide to SEO
            • How-to Guides
            • Moz Academy
            • API Docs
            About Moz
            • About
            • Team
            • Careers
            • Contact
            Why Moz
            • Case Studies
            • Testimonials
            Get Involved
            • Become an Affiliate
            • MozCon
            • Webinars
            • Practical Marketer Series
            • MozPod
            Connect with us

            Contact the Help team

            Join our newsletter
            Moz logo
            © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
            • Accessibility
            • Terms of Use
            • Privacy