The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Technical SEO Issues
    4. Canonical vs Alternate for country based subdomain dupe content?

    Canonical vs Alternate for country based subdomain dupe content?

    Technical SEO Issues
    4 2 128
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • lvdh1
      lvdh1 last edited by

      What's the correct method for tagging dupe content between country based subdomains?

      We have:

      mydomain.com // default, en-us

      www.mydomain.com // en-us

      uk.mydomain.com // uk, en-gb

      au.mydomain.com // australia, en-au

      eu.mydomain.com // europe, en-eu

      In the header of each we currently have rel="alternate" tags but we're still getting dupe content warnings in Moz for the "WWW" subdomain.

      Question 1) Are we headed in the right direction with using alternate? Or would it be better to use canonical since the languages are technically all English, just different regions. The content is pretty much the same minus currency and localization differences.

      Question 2) How can we solve the dupe content between WWW and the base domain, since the above isn't working.

      Thanks so much

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • gfiorelli1
        gfiorelli1 last edited by

        In cases like yours, using the hreflang is the correct way to handle the duplicate content issue, because of the characteristics you yourself cite: currency and localization, which may be tiny differences in terms of "content" but huge in terms of usability and making completely different a product page from another.

        Remember that if you canonicalize all the "duplicate" toward the canonical, the canonicalized URLs won't be shown in the countries you're targeting with those URLs... so screwing up the international SEO strategy 100%, so each URL must have as canonical its own URL (self referential), apart the obvious canonicalization rules being applied (e.g.: url with parameter canonicalized to url without parameter).

        In case the URL is canonicalized for whatever reason, remember to indicate the canonical URLs in the href of the hreflang annotations. On the contrary Google will start alerting of no-return URLs errors.

        Regarding the Moz Pro crawler... don't pay attention to it, because it doesn't consider the hreflang annotation,therefore it will continue saying that those pages are duplicate.

        lvdh1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • lvdh1
          lvdh1 @gfiorelli1 last edited by

          Thanks.

          So then I am safe when including all of these on every subdomain?

          I have a common header where the above is the exact same for every subdomain (all 4 are always included), which I assume is the correct way?

          Also: Why doesn't Moz look at the hreflang tag? I'm very worried about just "ignoring" what the tool says... why is the top SEO tool in the world not capable of correctly detecting dupe content? I'm not sure I'm comfortable with just ignoring the check engine light, so to speak.

          gfiorelli1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • gfiorelli1
            gfiorelli1 @lvdh1 last edited by

            Yes.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • 1 / 1
            • First post
              Last post
            • Content on top-level-domain vs. content on subpage
              MGMT
              MGMT
              0
              2
              277

            • 301s vs. rel=canonical for duplicate content across domains
              jamesm5i
              jamesm5i
              0
              5
              499

            • Google inconsistent in display of meta content vs page content?
              KeriMorgret
              KeriMorgret
              0
              6
              443

            • Subdirectories vs subdomains
              hectorpn
              hectorpn
              0
              5
              797

            • Canonical pagination content
              john4math
              john4math
              0
              6
              2.8k

            • Canonical Link for Duplicate Content
              wissamdandan
              wissamdandan
              0
              4
              881

            Get started with Moz Pro!

            Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

            Start my free trial
            Products
            • Moz Pro
            • Moz Local
            • Moz API
            • Moz Data
            • STAT
            • Product Updates
            Moz Solutions
            • SMB Solutions
            • Agency Solutions
            • Enterprise Solutions
            • Digital Marketers
            Free SEO Tools
            • Domain Authority Checker
            • Link Explorer
            • Keyword Explorer
            • Competitive Research
            • Brand Authority Checker
            • Local Citation Checker
            • MozBar Extension
            • MozCast
            Resources
            • Blog
            • SEO Learning Center
            • Help Hub
            • Beginner's Guide to SEO
            • How-to Guides
            • Moz Academy
            • API Docs
            About Moz
            • About
            • Team
            • Careers
            • Contact
            Why Moz
            • Case Studies
            • Testimonials
            Get Involved
            • Become an Affiliate
            • MozCon
            • Webinars
            • Practical Marketer Series
            • MozPod
            Connect with us

            Contact the Help team

            Join our newsletter
            Moz logo
            © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
            • Accessibility
            • Terms of Use
            • Privacy