The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4. Rel=canonical and internal links

    Rel=canonical and internal links

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    3 2 379
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • unirmk
      unirmk last edited by

      Hi Mozzers,

      I was musing about rel=canonical this morning and it occurred to me that I didnt have a good answer to the following question:

      • How does applying a rel=canonical on page A referencing page B as the canonical version affect the treatment of the links on page A?

      I am thinking of whether those links would get counted twice, or in the case of ver-near-duplicates which may have an extra sentence which includes an extra link, whther that extra link would count towards the internal link graph or not.

      I suspect that google would basically ignore all the content on page A and only look to page B taking into account only page Bs  links.

      Any thoughts?

      Thanks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • StephanSolomonidis
        StephanSolomonidis last edited by

        It's an interesting question. I'll extend your example slightly, so that we have:

        • Page A, with a canonical pointing to Page B
        • Page A also has a regular link to Page C
        • Page B does not link to Page C at all

        At the crawling stage, Googlebot will parse all of the links on Page A. So in this case it discovers both B and C (if it doesn't know of their existence already). This is uncontroversial stuff—the use of the canonical tag doesn't affect crawling/discovery.

        You might then assume that Google—if it decides to obey the canonical instruction, which of course it doesn't always do—will pass all of Page A's link equity to Page B (minus the small fraction), and then no longer count that link from A to C in the link graph. Almost like a redirect, but for bots only.

        However, that doesn't seem to happen. The link from A to C is still included in the link graph. PageRank (or whatever's replaced it) may still flow through that link, even though Page A is not to be indexed.

        So to answer your original question, the content of Page A will not be ignored, and neither will its links. The unclear bit is how much Google will value that link from A to C.

        unirmk 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • unirmk
          unirmk @StephanSolomonidis last edited by

          Thanks a lot for your reply Stephan!

          I would be super intertesting to read a little more around the subject. Do you have any studies or cases you might refer me to which describe the flow of link equity to "page C" from "Page A"?

          Many thanks

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • 1 / 1
          • First post
            Last post
          • Internal Clicks and CTR. Is REL=canonical better than Noindex in this case?
            Andrew-SEO
            Andrew-SEO
            0
            3
            73

          • Case Sensitive URLs, Duplicate Content & Link Rel Canonical
            allianzireland
            allianzireland
            0
            4
            3.0k

          • Cross Domain Rel Canonical tags vs. Rel Canonical Tags for internal webpages
            VanguardCommunications
            VanguardCommunications
            0
            5
            1.2k

          • Do I need to use rel="canonical" on pages with no external links?
            CleverPhD
            CleverPhD
            0
            5
            228

          • Rel Canonical Link on the Canonical Page
            Stew222
            Stew222
            0
            4
            248

          • Does Google crawl and spider for other links in rel=canonical pages?
            SEOAndy
            SEOAndy
            0
            3
            1.1k

          • Meta name="canonical" content="uRL" usage instead of link rel
            Ideas-Money-Art
            Ideas-Money-Art
            0
            10
            4.7k

          • To "Rel canon" or not to "Rel canon" that is the question
            Dr-Pete
            Dr-Pete
            0
            10
            728

          Get started with Moz Pro!

          Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

          Start my free trial
          Products
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Local
          • Moz API
          • Moz Data
          • STAT
          • Product Updates
          Moz Solutions
          • SMB Solutions
          • Agency Solutions
          • Enterprise Solutions
          • Digital Marketers
          Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Authority Checker
          • Link Explorer
          • Keyword Explorer
          • Competitive Research
          • Brand Authority Checker
          • Local Citation Checker
          • MozBar Extension
          • MozCast
          Resources
          • Blog
          • SEO Learning Center
          • Help Hub
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO
          • How-to Guides
          • Moz Academy
          • API Docs
          About Moz
          • About
          • Team
          • Careers
          • Contact
          Why Moz
          • Case Studies
          • Testimonials
          Get Involved
          • Become an Affiliate
          • MozCon
          • Webinars
          • Practical Marketer Series
          • MozPod
          Connect with us

          Contact the Help team

          Join our newsletter
          Moz logo
          © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
          • Accessibility
          • Terms of Use
          • Privacy