Superficial content with little or no added value

[stroke]

This post is deleted!

[donford]

GENERAL NOTICE NOT SAFE FOR WORK

You should make sure you mention that for others benefits, most people here work in office settings.

I won't be able to look at the sites until I go home.

Perhaps others maybe able to help before then.

Good luck.

[stroke]

Sorry,

I forgot to mention this was despair
Are adult websites
Sorry it.

[donford]

Perhaps you can edit that disclaimer in.

[Linda-Vassily]

Yes, I went to one of the websites before reading these replies and could hardly get the page closed fast enough--a lot of people can see my screen. Yes, the original poster should definitely edit in a disclaimer before the links!

[KeriMorgret]

I've added a disclaimer that the sites are NSFW. I looked at each for about two seconds, but didn't want them up on my work computer for too long either. It appears that the two sites are offering free porn videos?

Google's notice is that there is very little content of value. My question to you is what unique do you have on these pages? Where do you get the content? Is it all the same as you can find on many other sites? Is there any copyrighted content? What can you tell us in general terms about the content and what you've done with the site, since it will be difficult for many people to examine the sites?

[stroke]

Thank you for for the warning, I was not able to edit.

The fact is that the videos are embed from redtube.com, but selected the best, and described. The videos do not have so much to be improved in a matter of content, I believe.

Adult video site, is basically the video quality content, the brief description is only an aid, people who want to watch videos, and not many texts.

So honestly do not know how to handle this case, due to these circumstances. I have some videos that pull in FLV format. The videos are loaded them, and many irrelevant videos, from the time that the videos are translated, described and selected become much better to access the contents of redtube eg

The strange that the warning was for all my sites, about 30, it seems that sought assimilation into account and sent at all.

Thanks for all who may be helping me

[stroke]

I do not know how to solve it to make the request for reconsideration, I can not say to what extent the google wants me to improve.

[KeriMorgret]

You might want to look at the links Google included about this warning, as well as these following links:

http://searchenginewatch.com/sew/news/2292495/thin-content-with-little-or-no-added-value-manual-action-google-on-how-to-fix-it

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2604719?hl=en

You've got a tough niche in that there are a ton of other people try to do the same thing as you; you have some serious competition and Google is wanting to show unique results to users, not just pages of results that all lead to the exact same videos.

[stroke]

Hello,

I understood what google wants, I'm working with partnership that will have unique videos.

But how do I solve? Embed the videos? Will have to be removed? Ie erase everything? Or is that if I start now with unique videos is enough? In fact, in Brazil, 99% of the videos work well.

Remove all, would be to start from scratch, wanted to see a way that does not happen.

How do I solve? What should I do with the old?

Thanks for your answers and help.