The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Technical SEO Issues
    4. Job/Blog Pages and rel=canonical

    Job/Blog Pages and rel=canonical

    Technical SEO Issues
    2 2 365
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • accessKellyOCG
      accessKellyOCG last edited by

      Hi,

      I know there are several questions and articles concerning the rel=canonical on SEOmoz, but I didn't find the answer I was looking for...

      We have some job pages, URLs are: /jobs and then jobs/2, jobs/3 etc..

      Our blog pages follow the same: /blog, /blog2, /blog/3...

      Our CMS is self-produced, and every job/blog-page has the same title tag. According to SEOmoz (and the Webmaster Tools), we have a lots of duplicate title tags because of this problem.

      If we put the rel=canonical on each page's source code, the title tag problem will be solved for google, right? Because they will just display the /job and /blog main page. That would be great because we dont want 40 blog pages in the index.

      My concern (a stupid question, but I am not sure): if we put the rel=canonical on the pages, does google crawl them and index our job links? We want to keep our rankings for our job offers on pages 2-xxx.

      More simple: will we find our job offers on jobs/2, jobs/3... in google, if these pages have the rel=canonical on them?

      AND ONE MORE: does the SEOmoz bot also follow the rel=canonical and then reduce the number of duplicate title-tags in the campaigns???

      Thanx........

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Matthew_Edgar
        Matthew_Edgar last edited by

        Hi,

        First off, even with a canonical, I'd suggest you have a unique title tag if for no other reason than users. Changing the title, even slightly, can help. For my clients, I usually suggest something simple like adding ", Page #2" after the main title. Google may or may not index the page, but that way if a user bookmarks the page (or shares it), the title is different.

        Second, you need more than a canonical link to correct this problem. You are dealing with a sequence, which means you need to use rel prev/next as well as the canonical. (For example: on page 2 of your jobs, the canonical would be /jobs/2, the rel prev would be /jobs, and rel next would be /jobs/3.) Treating these pages like a sequence will help explain this group of pages more effectively. And, that means...

        Finally, the rel prev/next would also help those second, third, fourth, etc. pages  from falling out of Google's index and allow Google to find those jobs listed on those subsequent pages. Instead of telling Google that the subsequent pages are duplications (which is what you are saying by having a canonical referencing the main page on each subsequent page), you instead would be saying that these pages are grouped together as a sequence making it acceptable for Google to crawl through those pages.

        I hope that helps. Also, I'm not sure how SEOmoz handles the canonical in regards to duplicate content.

        Thanks.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • 1 / 1
        • First post
          Last post
        • Rel=canonical or 301 to pass on page authority/juice
          ThompsonPaul
          ThompsonPaul
          0
          6
          101

        • Meta data & xml sitemaps for mobile sites when using rel="canonical"/rel="alternate" annotations
          Dr-Pete
          Dr-Pete
          0
          2
          714

        • Rel canonical for partner sites - product pages only or also homepage and other key pages?
          0
          1
          73

        • How to redirect my .com/blog to my server folder /blog ?
          AymanH
          AymanH
          0
          5
          149

        • After I 301 redirect duplicate pages to my rel=canonical page, do I need to add any tags or code to the non canonical pages?
          Mike.Goracke
          Mike.Goracke
          0
          2
          125

        • Moving content from CMS pages to a blog - 301 or rel canonical?
          TakeshiYoung
          TakeshiYoung
          0
          4
          187

        • Duplicate Page Content / Rel Canonical
          Joseph-Green-SEO
          Joseph-Green-SEO
          0
          13
          349

        • Rel canonical to dissimilar pages
          DennisNarvedsen
          DennisNarvedsen
          0
          2
          599

        Get started with Moz Pro!

        Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

        Start my free trial
        Products
        • Moz Pro
        • Moz Local
        • Moz API
        • Moz Data
        • STAT
        • Product Updates
        Moz Solutions
        • SMB Solutions
        • Agency Solutions
        • Enterprise Solutions
        • Digital Marketers
        Free SEO Tools
        • Domain Authority Checker
        • Link Explorer
        • Keyword Explorer
        • Competitive Research
        • Brand Authority Checker
        • Local Citation Checker
        • MozBar Extension
        • MozCast
        Resources
        • Blog
        • SEO Learning Center
        • Help Hub
        • Beginner's Guide to SEO
        • How-to Guides
        • Moz Academy
        • API Docs
        About Moz
        • About
        • Team
        • Careers
        • Contact
        Why Moz
        • Case Studies
        • Testimonials
        Get Involved
        • Become an Affiliate
        • MozCon
        • Webinars
        • Practical Marketer Series
        • MozPod
        Connect with us

        Contact the Help team

        Join our newsletter
        Moz logo
        © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
        • Accessibility
        • Terms of Use
        • Privacy