Shoing strong for last 2 years for search terms NOW GONE! What happened?

[KeriMorgret]

I looked at some of your content, and some of it seems quite thin, such as the regulations for each state. There's really only a couple of sentences (in the instances that I saw) that deal with the individual state, and then there's a lot of boilerplate content, navigation, and other site elements that are the same from page to page. Just one more thing to think about.

[Devanur-Rafi]

Just my two cents friend..

4 days back, Google released Panda 4.0. You can check if that caused the drop.

Here is a tool that can help you find if any of the Google penalties are behind the drop:

http://www.barracuda-digital.co.uk/panguin-tool/

Once on the page, click on the 'Log-in to Analytics' button and allow the tool to access your Google Analytics account and check if the recent Panda caused the drop. Hope this helps.

Good luck. By the way, thin content is of no use these days and you should be investing all your quality time in producing quality content.

Best,

Devanur Rafi

[altecdesign]

To help figure out what is causing the 404 errors do the following in webmaster tools:

-login to your websites profile, then on the left hand side navigation hit crawl > crawl errors > not found.  Under not found review the list of URL's for clues (you can also click on an individual link to see where the 404 page was linked from).  Depending on how large your site is, if the 747 not found URL's is a large percentage of your total page count, you could be experiencing a temporary rankings drop that will disappear one you fix your error pages.  If you could add a link to a few of the 404 error pages we could help you figure out what is wrong with your site code or server setup.

[MarieHaynes]

There were two major algorithm updates last week - Panda and the Payday loans algorithm.  Payday loans affects sites that had done really spammy link building and it is very unlikely that this affected you.  But, Panda is certainly possible.

I haven't had a good look at the site, but I see that you have 263 pages indexed in Google.  Are all of these pages high quality pages that Google would be proud to show to searchers?  If you've got duplication amongst the pages or if you've got "unhelpful" pages that are indexed then you need to remove or noindex them.  On a quick look here are some examples of pages that should be removed or noindexed:

http://www.popscrap.com/component/content/category/11-demo-articles

http://www.popscrap.com/component/users/?view=remind

http://www.popscrap.com/24-products/120-scrapshield - It looks like a good amount of the text on this page is on multiple pages of your site.

Of course, there could be other issues.  If you've made any changes to the site recently then I'd look at those changes first, but otherwise I'd go on a thorough cleanup so that only the pages that are the best are shown to Google.

[BBuck]

Thanks Marie! I'm getting the feeling it's the content. Quick question:  Could I just unpublish the content and then test over time, OR do I need to completely delete the questionable content from the site? Does Google see it if it is unpublished and still penalize?

[MarieHaynes]

While you can test this over time, it would be difficult because you will never know if you've done enough to satisfy Panda.  And really, you don't even know for sure if Panda is the culprilt.  (I think it is, but no one can say for sure.)

So, let's say you took out some of the low quality content and a month later nothing has changed.  That could mean that you didn't take out enough to make the Panda algorithm see your site as high quality.  But, it could be that you just need more time.  While some sites recover within one Panda refresh (and that usually happens approximately monthly), others seem to need several refreshes.

In regards to unpublishing vs deleting the content, you can either delete the pages or you can use a noindex tag to tell Google not to include the pages in the index.  Having low quality pages on your site that are noindexed will not hurt you in the eyes of Panda.

[BBuck]

Thank you! But what about unpublising? Is that the same thing as removing, in the eyes of Google?I want to remove ALL pages under the "Scrap Laws" menu, because I think that is where the issue is. But I don't want to delete totally and have to recreate them all later.  Thnaks again!

[MarieHaynes]

If unpublishing causes the pages to either be removed from your site or noindexed then yes, that's the same thing.

[Jeepster]

"Thin content" question:
I run a real estate website and carry about 4,500 property pages (each page consisting of between 5-13 photos and about 50-300 words of a property description) Might the pages of ~50 words run the risk of being deemed "thin content" even though they have photos on them?
I also have around 200-250 article pages that are far more text-heavy.
FWIW, I don't think I've been hit by Panda 4.0. (I've slid from about #8 to #12 over the past 2 weeks but I suspect that's more to do with sluggish content marketing/link-building).

[MarieHaynes]

It's hard to say what Google views as thin.  Here are some factors I would consider when making that decision:

-Is the content the same MLS description that is on multiple sites?  If so, then I'd noindex it.

-Do users engage with your content?  Short content can be useful.  If Google sees that people are actually engaging with your site then they will have no problem with thin content.

It sounds to me like these pages are probably ok.  But I can't say for certain.

[Jeepster]

Thanks for the response, Marie

I asked the question as I was wondering whether I'd need to add "boilerplate" text to each description to fill it out. I'd rather not as a) it's not very scaleable and b) I'm not sure it would add value to our users per se, as in the main people want to see pictures. Here's an example of one of the shorter descriptions we run.

-Is the content the same MLS description that is on multiple sites?  If so, then I'd noindex it Of the 4,500 pages, 95-98% are content that's unique to our site (the other ~2-5% are managed by individual realtors who I'm guessing probably copy and paste descriptions from their own sites. We're not in the US so aren't part of the MLS network).

-Do users engage with your content? Mos' def.

[MarieHaynes]

On a quick look my gut instinct is that this is ok.  However, on a site: search I'm seeing that you have over 19,000 pages indexed in Google.  That's a bit of a Panda flag for me as most likely there are not 19,000 unique pages that add value on your site.

[BBuck]

Well, I removed the suspect content, and after 2 weeks, nothing. Then I added Google Authorship to each page, and the NEXT DAY the site is back in the top positions for our target terms, and the leads are pouring in. Was it the Google Authorship? It certainly felt like it. But I thought that was not a ranking factor.

Anyway, thanks for all the support! BB