The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. White Hat / Black Hat SEO
    4. Competitors and Duplicate Content

    Competitors and Duplicate Content

    White Hat / Black Hat SEO
    8 5 579
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DeliaAssociates
      DeliaAssociates last edited by

      I'm curious to get people's opinion on this.

      One of our clients (Company A) has a competitor that's using duplicate sites to rank.  They're using "www.companyA.com" and "www.CompanyAIndustryTown.com" (actually, several of the variations).  It's basically duplicate content, with maybe a town name inserted or changed somewhere on the page.  I was always told that this is not a wise idea.  They started doing this in the past month or so when they had a site redesign.  So far, it's working pretty well for them.  So, here's my questions:

      -Would you address this directly (report to Google, etc.)?

      -Would you ignore this?

      -Do you think it's going to backfire soon?

      There's another company (Company B) that's using another practice- using separate pages on their domain to address different towns, and using those as landing pages.  Similar, in that a lot of the content is the same, just some town names and minor details changed.  All on the same domain though.  Would the same apply to that?

      Thanks for your insight!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W3designer
        W3designer last edited by

        Having multiple sites with duplicate content is a bad idea as it affects your search engine rankings. The company is likely to be using bad SEO practice and soon google bots will pick this up and the domain will get penalised.

        You can report to Google, but in most cases Google picks up sites that are using bad SEO techniques.

        There is no harm in using separate pages on domains name to address they operate in different towns as this helps the site being found for local searches, but having content that is again duplicated and only a few words changed Google will pick this up.

        Always remember Content is KING!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • W3designer
          W3designer last edited by

          here is an example of sites that have been using duplicate content with a few word changes

          http://www.seomoz.org/q/duplicate-exact-match-domains-flagged-by-google-need-help-reinclusion

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • HughesDigital
            HughesDigital last edited by

            The pages with the city specific information but similar content are pretty much the perfect space for a canonical tag.  If you feel that they haven't been penalized, then this is probably the method they are using for hosting the same content.

            DeliaAssociates MSWD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DeliaAssociates
              DeliaAssociates @HughesDigital last edited by

              So let me clarify then, if they have (on same domain) multiple pages with near duplicate content, mostly changing names of cities, but use rel:canonical, they will still have the SEO benefit of ranking for different towns, but it won't be seen as duplicate content?

              And then the multiple domain situation...that's just a wait and see.

              Cyrus-Shepard 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • MSWD
                MSWD @HughesDigital last edited by

                So ARE you suggesting that for local city pages that you add the canonical tag to point to the home page?

                I guess I'm a little confused on this as Adam is?

                Can you explain your thoughts behind this?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Cyrus-Shepard
                  Cyrus-Shepard @DeliaAssociates last edited by

                  Unfortunately, this isn't a method likely to work.

                  Most of the time, if you insert canonical tags on near similar pages, and Google interprets those canonical correctly, then they tend to index and rank the page that the canonical points to. So all of those other pages would have little or no search engine visibility whatsoever.

                  Not a good technique if you're trying to rank individual pages.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Cyrus-Shepard
                    Cyrus-Shepard last edited by

                    The only long lasting way to rank for local specific pages is to offer truly unique content on those pages, and build unique links to those pages.

                    The two methods you mentioned here, using near duplicate sites and pages, may work for a short time or in non-competitive niches. It may also work somewhat if a very strong link profile is backing it up... but in general these sorts of tricks usually result in a drop in rankings. If not now, then during an upcoming algorythm change.

                    Often times, misguided webmasters think they are doing the right thing in launching these sites and pages, and no ill intent is intended. Unless the pages are obviously spam or doorway pages, then in my opinion it's probably not worth it reporting them to Google, but that decision is of course best left to each individual.

                    Read more about doorway pages: http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66355

                    Consider how Yelp has 100s of pages about dentist, at least one page for every major city in America. Although the pages are similar, they are each filled with unique content and all have unique links pointing to them. Each delivers a similar message, but provides unique value based on that particular location.

                    Add unique value to each location specific page, and you're doing great.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • 1 / 1
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    • Duplicate content site not penalized
                      KenSchaefer
                      KenSchaefer
                      0
                      3
                      60

                    • How do i check content is fresh or duplicate?
                      LoganRay
                      LoganRay
                      0
                      5
                      78

                    • Competitor ranking well with duplicate content—what are my options?
                      Ray-pp
                      Ray-pp
                      0
                      4
                      450

                    • Looking for a Way to Standardize Content for Thousands of Pages w/o Getting Duplicate Content Penalties
                      TakeshiYoung
                      TakeshiYoung
                      1
                      9
                      250

                    • Is this Duplicate content?
                      DougRoberts
                      DougRoberts
                      0
                      5
                      164

                    • Is this a duplicated content?
                      Everett
                      Everett
                      0
                      5
                      111

                    • Rel author and duplicate content
                      Christy-Correll
                      Christy-Correll
                      0
                      5
                      519

                    • Duplicate Content
                      Dr-Pete
                      Dr-Pete
                      0
                      3
                      102

                    Get started with Moz Pro!

                    Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                    Start my free trial
                    Products
                    • Moz Pro
                    • Moz Local
                    • Moz API
                    • Moz Data
                    • STAT
                    • Product Updates
                    Moz Solutions
                    • SMB Solutions
                    • Agency Solutions
                    • Enterprise Solutions
                    • Digital Marketers
                    Free SEO Tools
                    • Domain Authority Checker
                    • Link Explorer
                    • Keyword Explorer
                    • Competitive Research
                    • Brand Authority Checker
                    • Local Citation Checker
                    • MozBar Extension
                    • MozCast
                    Resources
                    • Blog
                    • SEO Learning Center
                    • Help Hub
                    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                    • How-to Guides
                    • Moz Academy
                    • API Docs
                    About Moz
                    • About
                    • Team
                    • Careers
                    • Contact
                    Why Moz
                    • Case Studies
                    • Testimonials
                    Get Involved
                    • Become an Affiliate
                    • MozCon
                    • Webinars
                    • Practical Marketer Series
                    • MozPod
                    Connect with us

                    Contact the Help team

                    Join our newsletter
                    Moz logo
                    © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                    • Accessibility
                    • Terms of Use
                    • Privacy