The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4. Is "Car Discount" a problematic anchor text for CarDiscount.com (google penguin)?

    Is "Car Discount" a problematic anchor text for CarDiscount.com (google penguin)?

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    9 4 294
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • lcourse
      lcourse last edited by

      I have a couple of partial match domains in the format KEYOWRDdiscount.com and also the website name resembles domain name.

      "Car Discount" is not my website but just an example to illustrate: 
      Is "Car Discount" a problematic anchor text for CarDiscount.com?
      Should I try to modify existing external anchor texts to "CarDiscount" or "CarDiscount.com" instead of "Car Discount"

      Do you know of any cases where such anchor texts coinciding with partial match domain were likely reason for penguin penalization?

      Thanks.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • AndyKuiper
        AndyKuiper last edited by

        You'll want to make sure you have 'varied' anchor text for your backlinks. Too many of one type will be seen as 'unnatural'by Google and may result in less than rewarding behaviour by the algo.

        Lately (since Penguin) many have found it safer to focus on the most natural anchor text backlinks, for example, http://www.domainname.com.

        Having an exact match domain name and matching backlink anchor text is a recipe for trouble.

        There are many posts and articles about Penguin and exact match domains, which you may want to look over to be certain this advice is the best for your situation.

        AndreVanKets 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • AndreVanKets
          AndreVanKets @AndyKuiper last edited by

          I've always wondered about that...

          I think that especially for commercial terms, you would want to diversify your anchor profile were possible.

          But then you have a case were the brand name is not commercial, in this case i would think using your brand name in your anchor is best.

          I remember cleaning up our link profile by changing commercial anchor text to just using our brand name which helped, but then what about the exact match domains? Does this apply for them as well? Is it possible to have a "brand" with a term like "Cardiscount.com" without Google mistaking it for a commercial term?

          As you say, mix and match is the best approach just a bit confusing building a brand when the brand itself is a commercial term.

          Greg

          AndyKuiper 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • AndyKuiper
            AndyKuiper @AndreVanKets last edited by

            Good points Andre 🙂

            Google sometimes does gets confused with emd's combined with exact match backlink anchor text. I once had a domain (I sold the name and website) where I hadn't done any backlinking; it was strictly a non-monetized information site. It had the words "cellphone" and "barcode" in the domain name, and it naturally got "cellphone" "barcode" type anchor text backlinks. ---> it got hit by the 1st iteration of Penguin and traffic dropped by over 50%. The backlink portfolio was predominately exact match anchor text. People need to be extra careful with emd's now IF they are deemed to be keyword rich by the algo. Kraft or Michelin are not keyword rich, but something like "CarDiscount" might be 😉

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • lcourse
              lcourse last edited by

              Andy, thanks for sharing.

              The special point here is that "Car Discount", "CarDiscount" and "CarDiscount.com" are actually the most natural anchor texts that an independent site owner may choose apart from full URL anchor you mentioned.

              To give some context, I do not plan to build now many links with exactly this same anchor text. But these 3 anchor texts are actually the most frequent that other websites have chosen to link to me.

              So my doubt is now, whether there is need for action and whether I should reach out to other websites to change the anchor text, if my aim is to rank well for "Car". Actually I dropped significantly in ranking on one of my sites for "Car" keyword, so I wonder whether it may be related (even though for date of ranking change it may rather be panda than penguin).

              Also any experience whether CarDiscount or CarDiscount.com maybe better than "Car Discount"?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • AndyKuiper
                AndyKuiper last edited by

                http://www.cardiscount.com is as safe as you'll get in this case. If you can't get that term, than vary what you can to words other than "car" "discount", but with similar intent; eg. auto deals, auto incentives, special automobile rates, vehicle cost reductions... the types of anchor text one might see naturally. If you try to game Google, the algo will likely recognize it 🙂

                *this is one of the dangers of having a keyword rich domain name 😉

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jws8118
                  jws8118 last edited by

                  I think Google is smart enough to recognize that one of your top anchor text terms is your actual brand name but may still penalize you if those links are coming from spammy sites.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • AndyKuiper
                    AndyKuiper last edited by

                    Daniel, have a look at: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-emd-algo-update-early-data

                    and read some of the responses... this will give you some ideas 🙂

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • lcourse
                      lcourse last edited by

                      Andy, James: thanks for your input and suggestions.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • 1 / 1
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      • Would google consider this the anchor text?
                        davebuts
                        davebuts
                        0
                        2
                        34

                      • Any idea why Google Search Console stopped showing "Internal Links" and "Links to your site"
                        BlueCorona
                        BlueCorona
                        0
                        4
                        284

                      • Indexed Pages Different when I perform a "site:Google.com" site search - why?
                        0
                        1
                        118

                      • Why do Local "5 pack" results vary between showing Google+, Google+ and website address
                        RyanPurkey
                        RyanPurkey
                        0
                        2
                        87

                      • Does Google View "SRC", "HREF", TITLE and Alt tags as Duplicate Content on Home Page Slider?
                        Cyrus-Shepard
                        Cyrus-Shepard
                        0
                        2
                        711

                      • Is this the "Google Dance"?
                        CsmBill
                        CsmBill
                        0
                        5
                        217

                      • Any advice on acquiring "jump to" via anchor link text?
                        Dan-Petrovic
                        Dan-Petrovic
                        1
                        2
                        457

                      • Why DBDResults.com is #1 on Google for "Internet Marketing Agency"?
                        KeriMorgret
                        KeriMorgret
                        0
                        3
                        1.1k

                      Get started with Moz Pro!

                      Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                      Start my free trial
                      Products
                      • Moz Pro
                      • Moz Local
                      • Moz API
                      • Moz Data
                      • STAT
                      • Product Updates
                      Moz Solutions
                      • SMB Solutions
                      • Agency Solutions
                      • Enterprise Solutions
                      • Digital Marketers
                      Free SEO Tools
                      • Domain Authority Checker
                      • Link Explorer
                      • Keyword Explorer
                      • Competitive Research
                      • Brand Authority Checker
                      • Local Citation Checker
                      • MozBar Extension
                      • MozCast
                      Resources
                      • Blog
                      • SEO Learning Center
                      • Help Hub
                      • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                      • How-to Guides
                      • Moz Academy
                      • API Docs
                      About Moz
                      • About
                      • Team
                      • Careers
                      • Contact
                      Why Moz
                      • Case Studies
                      • Testimonials
                      Get Involved
                      • Become an Affiliate
                      • MozCon
                      • Webinars
                      • Practical Marketer Series
                      • MozPod
                      Connect with us

                      Contact the Help team

                      Join our newsletter
                      Moz logo
                      © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                      • Accessibility
                      • Terms of Use
                      • Privacy