The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Search Engine Trends
    4. Duplicate Pate Content - 404's or 301's?

    Duplicate Pate Content - 404's or 301's?

    Search Engine Trends
    4 4 369
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • braunna
      braunna last edited by

      I deleted about 100 pages of stale content 6 months ago and they are currently returning 404's. The crawl diagnostics have pointed out 77 duplicate pages because of this. Should I redirect these as 301's to get rid of the error or keep them as 404's? Most of the pages still have some page authority but I don't want to get penalized. Just looking for the best solution. Thanks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • SanketPatel
        SanketPatel last edited by

        Hi Braunna,

        Do you have related pages for those 100 pages ? 301 redirect is the best solution in your case only when you redirect those pages to most relevant pages so that some authority get transfer to those pages.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • VentaMarketing
          VentaMarketing last edited by

          I do not believe 404 pages will result in a penalty, and eventually they will be deindexed by search engines.

          Like SanketPatel said, 301 redirects are best used on a one to one basis, where the old page is related to the page it is getting 301 redirected to.

          If some of those pages have great links point to them, I would first make an effort to get those links changed to direct to the existing URLs. If that does not work, it might be worth considering creating a relevant page for a page with high page authority to be 301 redirected to.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • donford
            donford last edited by

            Hi Braunna,

            It sounds like you deleted pages, then remade them. It is great you're keeping up with the freshness of the site but for search engine purposes you should have simply updated the current page with fresh content, or remade the page then 301'd  the old page to the new page.

            In general you should try to avoid deleting pages or remaking the same page with a new url unless there is a reason greater than content driving the decision. Such as a new CMS (content management system, Joomla, WP, OSC etc..), switching server side scripting (php to asp), or overhauling navigation and architecture.

            If there was a case of a the page simply being completely useless and you are removing it completely then 404 would be correct. If you are seeing any duplicate content issues in this case it is likely because the search engines have not de-indexed the old page or it is still in their cache. Google can help you with removing cached versions and forcing de-indexing.

            I hope that hit the correct answer for you.

            Happy New Year

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • 1 / 1
            • First post
              Last post
            • Does Google considers the cached content of a page if it's redirected to new page?
              0
              1
              32

            • I have a page that I took down a while ago, but it's ranking on the first page for it's key word, and displaying a 404 :(
              Linda-Vassily
              Linda-Vassily
              0
              8
              69

            • SEO Myth-Busters -- Isn't there a "duplicate content" penalty by another name here?
              0
              1
              103

            • The evolution of Google's 'Quality' filters - Do thin product pages still need noindex?
              MarieHaynes
              MarieHaynes
              0
              7
              231

            • Duplicate Content?
              Prospector-Plastics
              Prospector-Plastics
              0
              4
              133

            • Duplicate Content
              ResslerMotors
              ResslerMotors
              0
              2
              535

            • To use the same content just changing the keywords could be seen as duplicate content?
              EGOL
              EGOL
              0
              4
              748

            • (Ireland & USA) Speilling 'Z' v's 'S'
              GlenBOB
              GlenBOB
              0
              5
              860

            Get started with Moz Pro!

            Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

            Start my free trial
            Products
            • Moz Pro
            • Moz Local
            • Moz API
            • Moz Data
            • STAT
            • Product Updates
            Moz Solutions
            • SMB Solutions
            • Agency Solutions
            • Enterprise Solutions
            • Digital Marketers
            Free SEO Tools
            • Domain Authority Checker
            • Link Explorer
            • Keyword Explorer
            • Competitive Research
            • Brand Authority Checker
            • Local Citation Checker
            • MozBar Extension
            • MozCast
            Resources
            • Blog
            • SEO Learning Center
            • Help Hub
            • Beginner's Guide to SEO
            • How-to Guides
            • Moz Academy
            • API Docs
            About Moz
            • About
            • Team
            • Careers
            • Contact
            Why Moz
            • Case Studies
            • Testimonials
            Get Involved
            • Become an Affiliate
            • MozCon
            • Webinars
            • Practical Marketer Series
            • MozPod
            Connect with us

            Contact the Help team

            Join our newsletter
            Moz logo
            © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
            • Accessibility
            • Terms of Use
            • Privacy