Is a 302 useful here?

[ClaytonKendall]

We have a site that had one super successful viral video a couple of years back and basically the site needs a ton of work to even be functional. We don't have the time or the resources to even touch it. Our video is still getting tons of views today and I'm fairly certain it's the only reason the site still gets traffic. Most of the views come from youtube which prompts them to check out the site. We plan on going back to the site at a later date, but for now wanted to redirect it to another site of ours. In this case is it best practice to 302? or is a 301 still the proper solution?

[firstconversion]

I would say 301. Although theoretically it may be technically correct to use a 302, if you want the value of the link juice and you are not sure when you may get back to this site (if ever) a 301 seems a better bet

S

[RobMay]

Yep, I would go with a 301 also. Keep that juice (or as much as you can muster).. you'll lose a little value in the transfer.. (5-15%), but it would be worth keeping it. Cheers!