Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I'm aware of those tools but I'm interested in also seeing it from the perspective of the keywords competitors are mentioning on their page.

I'm referring to getting an idea of the most recurring content of the page. For example this page does what I want on 1 url I just am looking to see the averages across a large list of url's:

http://www.ranks.nl/cgi-bin/ranksnl/spider/spider.cgi

I'm starting to think I may need some sort of excel macro for this.

Are there any tools that will take a large URL list and give you a breakdown of the most commonly occurring keywords across the links?

Does a long scrolling page of text perform better than a page that has the content in sections that have to be moused over to be seen? Are there any articles or research on this?

Very good answer! If they get down that far it means they're still looking for confidence and need to be further convinced. Thanks for the inspiration.

Thanks for the typo just had updated the copy today and added the link. I think I'm going to add an about us tab with testimonials and stuff. I've noticed If I have too much linking than I usually decrease conversion rates.

Here's the page in question. A/B testing is good once you have ideas but right now I'm still in the idea creation state for what to put in the footer.

I'm using an isolated page though so links to other pages on the site wouldn't be appropriate. Currently I just have our address and a privacy policy link. Wanted to see if I should put something in there.

From a conversion perspective what are the best elements to have in the footer of a Paid landing page.

Interesting. Thanks that's valuable. Maybe I'll just leave it with the iframe?

I found this site the describes how to use excel to batch lookup url's using seomoz api.

The only problem is the seomoz api times out and returns 1 if I try dragging the formula down the cells which leaves me copying, waiting 5 seconds and copying again.

This is basically as slow as manually looking up each url. Does anyone know a workaround?