Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi there, sorry to hear you're in such a stressful situation.

I think the site in question is probably this one based on what you were saying. By doing a site: search for that site I can see pages appearing, so I think it's unlikely that the site has been removed from the index. However, I can see that if I turn off JavaScript on the homepage it is pretty much blank and is canonicalised to another page - bedste-kontorfaellesskab-koebenhavn-k/

That page in turn redirects to the homepage, that's going to be giving Google some pretty confusing signals about the site - with JS off it looks like the pages are blank and canonicalised to a redirecting page. I'd definitely have a look into that.

Hmm, I don't think that addresses what we are trying to change. I think you will need to discuss with them the status code they are using as part of the redirect - unless I've missed something none of the above seems to include anything specifying status code.

Hi there, always good to be thinking of ways to improve.

In my opinion you're hitting a good balance in terms of your attitude - if the links are driving value for customers then great. The 100 links threshold is a rule of thumb to avoid pages which are laden with links that aren't helping, particularly because if we have that volume of links on a page it becomes much more likely that we've added links to less valuable pages which are distracting from the more valuable ones.

Before you start considering taking links out for the sake of it, I'd have a look at user behaviour across the site. Are any of the linked-to pages less frequently visited? Can we find anything out through click tracking on the homepage or through page view numbers in GA? I think those numbers could make a lot of the decision for you.

Hope that helps!