Welcome to the Q&A Forum

http://www.solar.org.il has over 1,000 Link Juice Leaks.

here is a typical sample

The link to "http://www.solar.org.il/services/%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD-%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD-%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD.html" has resulted in HTTP redirection to "http://www.solar.org.il/404.html".

something wrong there.

The is also a few canonical isses, pages blocked by robots, if you really have to block them, use a meta noindex,follow tag, so thsat the link juice will still flow.

50+ broken links, each one leaking link juice, example
The Web page contains the broken link 'http://www.solar.org.il/articles/search/.html'.

http://www.solar-israel.co.il

This site has 1,0000+ brokrn links, leaking link juice
The Web page contains the broken link 'http://www.solar-israel.co.il/investing-in-green-energy'

heaps of html errors, an example

The page at "http://www.solar-israel.co.il/" contains invalid markup.
The Tag 'p' was not closed correctly, the Tag 'div' was closed instead.

Both sites have many other issues in smaller numbers.

I dont know what suite os yours, but who very fixes all their leaks should out do the other.

not sure what type of server you are using, but with Microsoft IIS this is very easy to do, its matter of filling in a dialog box and all needed steps are done for you. see dialog box half way down page
http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/microsoft-technologies-and-seo-web-development

There are 3 steps you need to think about,

first the url rewrite,

second the is the corresponding 301 redirect

third either you mush change every url in the website, or you need to write a outbound urlrewrite so that links show freindly urls to vistors.

also why rewrite to '.html' thee is no need for it, simpley

'http://www.agroads.com.ar/humedimetro-para-cereales-draminski-gmm-139592' would bne the way to go.

OSE is only updated once a month, it's due to be updated 4/1/12 http://seomoz.zendesk.com/entries/345964-linkscape-update-schedule

I was refereing to the largest peice of text in grey. what text is left is very thin. much of it the same.

There are many pages that do have the same title of description, for example 224 page habvbe this description

"Plastic Storage Bins has the lowest prices on Plastic Bins, Plastic Containers
and Wire Shelving Units with shelf bins or stacking bins. 888-999-6099"

As for un-necessary redirects

The link to "http://plasticstorage.com/plastic-storage-specials.html" has resulted in HTTP redirection to "http://plasticstorage.com/plastic-storage-specials".

The link to "http://plasticstorage.com/plastic-bins-stackable.html" has resulted in HTTP redirection to "http://plasticstorage.com/plastic-bins-stackable".

The link to "http://plasticstorage.com/wire-shelving.html" has resulted in HTTP redirection to "http://plasticstorage.com/wire-shelving".

The link to "http://plasticstorage.com/plastic-bins-stackable/quantum.html" has resulted in HTTP redirection to http://plasticstorage.com/plastic-bins-stackable/quantum.

I assume you want friendly urls, but if you have internal links to the old urls, you will get un-necessary redirects, each one losing link juice.

I use the Bing SEO Toolkit that sees exactly what Bing sees, it sees 3868 of them each one leaking link juice.

Seen a few WordPress sites do this, usually it is a plug in that is causing the problem

Here is what googles states

Businesses that operate in a service area, as opposed to a single location,
should not create a listing for every city they service. Businesses that operate
in a service area should create one listing for the central office or location
and designate service areas

http://support.google.com/places/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=107528

A goog place to start
http://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo

Juist crawled your site and got this
The link to 'http://www.robinsonsofbawtry.com/' has resulted in an error.
Details: 403 Forbidden

Cant see anything wrong aty a glance, may be your server cant handle being crawled, witch of cause is not good

I wouldnt miss any, but i hope you arent redirecting them all to the home page.

Have a look at the link text and redirect to a page relevant to the link text and linking page, not the old linked page.

You will weaken the site you take the articles from, and strengthen the one you put them on.

The best advice is not to buy links, in the end it will hurt you

If you want to rank for the new term then do it. This is what it is for.

If you have a title of ABC and you change it to ABC XYZ

You may not rank quite as well for ABC anymore but you will rank for XYZ and ABC XYZ.

It is shown that the first word of your tile carries more weight then the second and so on, it is also shown that a title has so much power that is split between the terms. In other words if you are a only child you will inherit all your parents wealth, but if you have many brothers and sisters you will only get a fraction of that wealth. so the shorter yopur title the more credit each word will get.

google will find them unless you have hidden them behind no-index, but the number of internal links is not important, what is important is your linking structure.

http://thatsit.com.au/seo/tutorials/a-simple-explanation-of-pagerank

If you look at your source code and find this variable "availableLugares" it has a value that is so large that the search engine may not be reaching your content, I mean it is really large.

it looks like some json data, you should put it into a external js file

I had a look, it is 1300 for broad, but only 28 for phrase, and 16 for exact, now to me, the words daytona and insurance, are not words i would expect to see in the same search term unless the were in a phrase or exact. so something does not seem right here.

Yes you should use the keywords tag, Bing uses it as a signal.

A good and recommended use is misspellings of keywords and alternative keywords

http://www.bing.com/blogs/site_blogs/b/webmaster/archive/2009/07/18/head-s-up-on-lt-head-gt-tag-optimization-sem-101.aspx

Bing have made it clear that they will not index all pages, it is their policy to index only the best pages.

you can use BWMT to put urls directly into the index, Bing will give anny page a trial, but may boot it out again if not deemed usefull.

First I would not no-index any page, as you then have links that point to those pages pouring link juice into the abyss. If you must no-index a page use the meta no-index,follow this way the links will be followed and link juice can flow back into your site.

If these pages are not duplicates, then why canonical?

But seeing you have, I cant see no harm in what you have done. it would be good to ge a url so we can check that the canonicals are correct

Donford is correct in that is what matt cutts said, but i bet you if matts cutts main souce of income came from his web site he would change them.

You will lose a some link juice if you 301 redirect, i would look at the in-comming links, if the pages in question have little in links then i would change them. If you do, make sure you change all youyr internal links to point to the new format, dont allow internal links to go thought a redirect when you have controle of them.

Use a canonical tag would be the easiest