SEO ethical practice in question

[EGOL]

** What does this means in terms of how google sees her site and in terms of SEO. **

I'd say she doesn't have a site.  The service provider has usurped her site by intent or ignorance.

[SteveOllington]

Are you sure the site is fully ready and released yet? When we used to build sites for people, we'd host them like that on our own site in a directory just so the client could see the site, etc... up until it was ready to go live, at which point it would have it's own hosting.

If not that, then yeah it's ridiculous and your friend should tell them it needs its own hosting.

[EGOL]

Good point, Steve.  It could be a design proof.

[QualityHosting]

She is paying for "website" hosting.  Apparently Funktion Designs also does SEO.  How could a company view this as acceptable.

[QualityHosting]

I agree with you entirely.  Good answer.

[QualityHosting]

This site has been this way for like a year and she pays for hosting.

[EGOL]

OK.... not a design proof.  thanks

[MarieHaynes]

She may want to consider moving the site to another host! She can get a hosting plan at a number of reliable places for under $10 per month. Then she can start doing some SEO for her site! If she just wants a place where she can tell people, "Hey, this is my web address" then what she's got is sufficient. But, if she wants to be found by search engines, this just ain't going to work.

[EGOL]

Her new site might have a problem with the content on this guy's domain.  I would want him to put up a permanent redirect.  But I bet he will not do it.

[SteveOllington]

Haha, what the??!! They're charging her for hosting and putting her in a sub directory of their own domain? Jeez, that is brazen. And they clearly must be one of those companies that profess to supply SEO but don't actually know squat about it. Tell her to fire their ass! And to ask for a refund on all her hosting payments. Tell her to tell them that all us crazies on this thread would like to throw wet kippers at them!