The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Branding / Brand Awareness
    4. Sometimes I write a post for another site and then post the first 1/3rd on my site to help promote it. Is this a bad idea?

    Sometimes I write a post for another site and then post the first 1/3rd on my site to help promote it. Is this a bad idea?

    Branding / Brand Awareness
    2 2 64
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • mcarroll
      mcarroll last edited by

      Sometimes I write a post for another site and then post the first 1/3rd on my site to help promote it. Is this a bad idea? When I do that should I be adding a canonical link to the original post? Should I have /make sure the 3rd party site does something? Is there anything else I should do?

      Thanks in advance.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Chris.Menke
        Chris.Menke last edited by

        Leaving it as is is fine, although you can also properly rel=canonical it to the full post on the other domain if you or the publishing site want you to.  I would probably do that.

        Technically, it is considered duplicate content but google doesn't actually penalize for "duplicate" content per se. In cases such as yours, google just doesn't assign any ranking strength to the duplicate version--that is not the same as a penalty. So, if it is indexed first on the other site and/or that other site is a stronger site, or there is no  intent to make money through monetizing copied content, google will just assign the value for that content to that other site.

        https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2013/04/5-common-mistakes-with-relcanonical.html :  We recommend the following best practices for using rel=canonical:

        One test is to imagine you don’t understand the language of the content—if you placed the duplicate side-by-side with the canonical, does a very large percentage of the words of the duplicate page appear on the canonical page? If you need to speak the language to understand that the pages are similar; for example, if they’re only topically similar but not extremely close in exact words, the canonical designation might be disregarded by search engines.

        • A large portion of the duplicate page’s content should be present on the canonical version.

        https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66359?hl=en Duplicate content on a site is not grounds for action on that site unless it appears that the intent of the duplicate content is to be deceptive and manipulate search engine results. If your site suffers from duplicate content issues, and you don't follow the advice listed above, we do a good job of choosing a version of the content to show in our search results.

        “Duplicate content generally refers to substantive blocks of content within or across domains that either completely match other content or are appreciably similar. Mostly, this is not deceptive in origin…..” Google Webmaster Guidelines

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • 1 / 1
        • First post
          Last post
        • What marketing/branding services can you recommend to get more awareness of my site?
          SamuelScott
          SamuelScott
          0
          2
          147

        • Scribd embed links - bad idea?
          KaneJamison
          KaneJamison
          0
          2
          726

        • Is a press release a bad idea?
          AshShep1
          AshShep1
          0
          18
          288

        • Animated Favicon... Good or Bad Idea?
          mblsolutions
          mblsolutions
          0
          3
          858

        • Any/All opinions needed/welcomed for domain name idea choices:
          EGOL
          EGOL
          0
          3
          1.1k

        • Drop In Rankings / Traffic... Can you find any technical issues with my site?
          EGOL
          EGOL
          0
          7
          384

        • Should I put my "brand" in every one of my posts / pages?
          KristinnD
          KristinnD
          0
          5
          429

        • Does a +1 or Share appear in SERPs site-wide, or only for the page that is specifically shared?
          Arnx
          Arnx
          0
          3
          691

        Get started with Moz Pro!

        Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

        Start my free trial
        Products
        • Moz Pro
        • Moz Local
        • Moz API
        • Moz Data
        • STAT
        • Product Updates
        Moz Solutions
        • SMB Solutions
        • Agency Solutions
        • Enterprise Solutions
        • Digital Marketers
        Free SEO Tools
        • Domain Authority Checker
        • Link Explorer
        • Keyword Explorer
        • Competitive Research
        • Brand Authority Checker
        • Local Citation Checker
        • MozBar Extension
        • MozCast
        Resources
        • Blog
        • SEO Learning Center
        • Help Hub
        • Beginner's Guide to SEO
        • How-to Guides
        • Moz Academy
        • API Docs
        About Moz
        • About
        • Team
        • Careers
        • Contact
        Why Moz
        • Case Studies
        • Testimonials
        Get Involved
        • Become an Affiliate
        • MozCon
        • Webinars
        • Practical Marketer Series
        • MozPod
        Connect with us

        Contact the Help team

        Join our newsletter
        Moz logo
        © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
        • Accessibility
        • Terms of Use
        • Privacy