The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4. Internal search pages (and faceted navigation) solutions for 2018! Canonical or meta robots "noindex,follow"?

    Internal search pages (and faceted navigation) solutions for 2018! Canonical or meta robots "noindex,follow"?

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    1 1 397
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • SWEMII
      SWEMII last edited by

      There seems to conflicting information on how best to handle internal search results pages.

      To recap - they are problematic because these pages generally result in lots of query parameters being appended to the URL string for every kind of search - whilst the title, meta-description and general framework of the page remain the same - which is flagged in Moz Pro Site Crawl - as duplicate, meta descriptions/h1s etc.

      The general advice these days is NOT to disallow these pages in robots.txt anymore - because there is still value in their being crawled for all the links that appear on the page. But in order to handle the duplicate issues -  the advice varies into two camps on what to do:

      1. Add meta robots tag - with "noindex,follow" to the page
      This means the page will not be indexed with all it's myriad queries and parameters. And so takes care of any duplicate meta /markup issues - but any other links from the page can still be crawled and indexed = better crawling, indexing of the site, however you lose any value the page itself might bring.
      This is the advice Yoast recommends in 2017 : https://yoast.com/blocking-your-sites-search-results/ - who are adamant that Google just doesn't like or want to serve this kind of page anyway...

      2. Just add a canonical link tag - this will ensure that the search results page is still indexed as well.
      All the different query string URLs, and the array of results they serve - are 'canonicalised' as the same.
      However - this seems a bit duplicitous as the results in the page body could all be very different. Also - all the paginated results pages - would be 'canonicalised' to the main search page - which we know Google states is not correct implementation of canonical tag
      https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2013/04/5-common-mistakes-with-relcanonical.html

      this picks up on this older discussion here from 2012
      https://moz.com/community/q/internal-search-rel-canonical-vs-noindex-vs-robots-txt
      Where the advice was leaning towards using canonicals because the user was seeing a percentage of inbound into these search result pages - but i wonder if it will still be the case ?

      As the older discussion is now 6 years old - just wondering if there is any new approach or how others have chosen to handle internal search

      I think a lot of the same issues occur with faceted navigation as discussed here in 2017
      https://moz.com/blog/large-site-seo-basics-faceted-navigation

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • 1 / 1
      • First post
        Last post
      • To noindex and follow or noindex no follow?
        Gyorgy.B
        Gyorgy.B
        0
        4
        199

      • Need help technically with dealing with "no results" pages on our internal search engine.
        evolvingSEO
        evolvingSEO
        0
        12
        155

      • "noindex, follow" or "robots.txt" for thin content pages
        khi5
        khi5
        0
        6
        1.5k

      • Why is "Noindex" better than a "Canonical" for Pagination?
        Dr-Pete
        Dr-Pete
        0
        4
        1.2k

      • HELP! How does one prevent regional pages as being counted as "duplicate content," "duplicate meta descriptions," et cetera...?
        Alex-Harford
        Alex-Harford
        0
        2
        107

      • What is the difference between link rel="canonical" and meta name="canonical"?
        Ideas-Money-Art
        Ideas-Money-Art
        0
        3
        1.3k

      • Can too many "noindex" pages compared to "index" pages be a problem?
        fablau
        fablau
        0
        13
        1.3k

      • Is it better "nofollow" or "follow" links to external social pages?
        ITestenseAdv
        ITestenseAdv
        7
        5
        22.2k

      Get started with Moz Pro!

      Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

      Start my free trial
      Products
      • Moz Pro
      • Moz Local
      • Moz API
      • Moz Data
      • STAT
      • Product Updates
      Moz Solutions
      • SMB Solutions
      • Agency Solutions
      • Enterprise Solutions
      • Digital Marketers
      Free SEO Tools
      • Domain Authority Checker
      • Link Explorer
      • Keyword Explorer
      • Competitive Research
      • Brand Authority Checker
      • Local Citation Checker
      • MozBar Extension
      • MozCast
      Resources
      • Blog
      • SEO Learning Center
      • Help Hub
      • Beginner's Guide to SEO
      • How-to Guides
      • Moz Academy
      • API Docs
      About Moz
      • About
      • Team
      • Careers
      • Contact
      Why Moz
      • Case Studies
      • Testimonials
      Get Involved
      • Become an Affiliate
      • MozCon
      • Webinars
      • Practical Marketer Series
      • MozPod
      Connect with us

      Contact the Help team

      Join our newsletter
      Moz logo
      © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
      • Accessibility
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy