The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4. Sitemap and content question

    Sitemap and content question

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    3 3 302
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • brianvest
      brianvest last edited by

      This is our primary sitemap https://www.samhillbands.com/sitemaps/sitemap.xml

      We have a about 750 location based URL's that aren't currently linked anywhere on the site.

      https://www.samhillbands.com/sitemaps/locations.xml

      Google is indexing most of the URL because we submitted the locations sitemap directly for indexing.

      Thoughts on that?  Should we just create a page that contains all of the location links and make it live on the site?

      Should we remove the locations sitemap from separate indexing...because of duplicate content?

      # Sitemap Type Processed Issues Items Submitted Indexed
      --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
      1 /sitemaps/locations.xml Sitemap May 10, 2016 - Web 771 648
      2 /sitemaps/sitemap.xml Sitemap index May 8, 2016 - Web 862 730
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • KevinBudzynski
        KevinBudzynski last edited by

        I would create a HTML sitemap as well (useful for users and spiders) and also the XML sitemap (spiders). They both will help in indexing and will hopefully help in get the remainder of the 750 indexed. No worries on the duplicate content. Good luck!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ChrisAshton
          ChrisAshton last edited by

          Hi Brian,

          To answer your question directly, linking to these pages is the preferable option of the two.

          That said, if it were my campaign I'd be looking to cut down on the volume of these pages to make them a bit more manageable first. I've listed some suggestions below that may point you in the right direction, take from them what you may!

          Get Rid of These Location Pages These days, having a "Bands in Atlanta, GA" page isn't necessary to rank for that term. Your site is clearly about booking bands so if you've got a Georgia page in this example and your band's profiles list their locations, this combined with a generally well-optimised site means you can still rank for it just fine. Right now, having 750 orphan pages that are essentially duplicates of each other is not doing you any favors.

          Consider How the Users Expect to Find a Band The user experience on the site right now is by now means bad but if you were to remove these pages, this is the way I would go about it:

          Change "Browse Bands" to something more specific to their intent; perhaps "Find a Band". We're talking semantics here but "Browse Bands" suggests to me that I'm about to see a huge list of bands to sift through and I'm just as lazy as the next user.

          Let the filters do the work. From this band finder page (essentially your existing /bands#band-finder page), have 2 drop-down options at the top. The first one for Location and the other for Type or Genre. Again, minor changes but I would expect that most users want to find a band in a specific location so rather than putting this option in the top corner as a text link, make it the most prominent option on the page. Also stating that the other drop-down is before they click it is another minor difference but helpful. "Now Showing: All Bands" isn't entirely intuitive. Minor detail.

          Add a Page for Each State 750 location pages is not only hard to manage, it's also hard to offer unique value for. If you add a page for each state this is much easier to do. You can talk about the regional differences between each (most popular genres, different laws, any other common differences or booking requirements etc)

          You could also include the pre-filtered results for each state on these pages to give users another way to find a band quickly. ie From the California page, show the California bands by default and they can select their specific town/city from there if they like.

          Another great way to add unique and valuable content would be to have 1 to 3 featured bands on each state's page. This may be risky if it's going to upset other bands so it's obviously your call as well but it lets you expand a little more with something valuable and you could even include the areas they service which is a legit reason to talk about specific locations.

          Include Serviced Locations on Band Profile Pages The current band profile pages are excellent. Videos, song samples, a list of songs, photos, reviews etc. Great work! The only thing it's missing is the areas they service. This is redundant for people finding the band through location filters but not if they go straight to the "Select a Band" drop-down.

          Bonus points if this list of locations is also shown on a map rather than just a text list, though text is also important for those using Ctrl-F to find their location.

          Build Links to State or Band Pages Building location-specific links to either of these pages will add another signal to search engines that you offer the solution to a user's intent. This can be as simple as offering your featured bands a "featured on" type of badge that links back to their profile on your site. Something similar to "as seen on TV" where them linking to you genuinely helps their own site/image by suggesting to their visitors they're trustworthy.

          Don't Hide Too Much Content Be mindful of how much content is "hidden" in those pop-up windows. Bits and pieces of info is fine but if you do start populating pages with lots of content and obscuring most of it, you're devaluing your hard work!

          This turned into quite the lengthy response that went on a bit of a tangent but hopefully it's at least somewhat helpful to you anyway!

          Thin, duplicate pages bad; unique, rich landing pages good!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • 1 / 1
          • First post
            Last post
          • XML Sitemap Question!
            jasongmcmahon
            jasongmcmahon
            0
            4
            76

          • Medical / Health Content Authority - Content Mix Question
            EGOL
            EGOL
            0
            6
            145

          • Question on Moving Content
            evolvingSEO
            evolvingSEO
            1
            7
            138

          • XML sitemaps questions
            Martijn_Scheijbeler
            Martijn_Scheijbeler
            0
            3
            167

          • Duplicate Content Question
            NathanGilmore
            NathanGilmore
            0
            4
            122

          • Duplicate Content Question
            fablau
            fablau
            1
            9
            126

          • Duplicate Content Question
            EGOL
            EGOL
            0
            3
            245

          • What to do when unique content is out of the question?
            blu42media
            blu42media
            0
            3
            298

          Get started with Moz Pro!

          Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

          Start my free trial
          Products
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Local
          • Moz API
          • Moz Data
          • STAT
          • Product Updates
          Moz Solutions
          • SMB Solutions
          • Agency Solutions
          • Enterprise Solutions
          • Digital Marketers
          Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Authority Checker
          • Link Explorer
          • Keyword Explorer
          • Competitive Research
          • Brand Authority Checker
          • Local Citation Checker
          • MozBar Extension
          • MozCast
          Resources
          • Blog
          • SEO Learning Center
          • Help Hub
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO
          • How-to Guides
          • Moz Academy
          • API Docs
          About Moz
          • About
          • Team
          • Careers
          • Contact
          Why Moz
          • Case Studies
          • Testimonials
          Get Involved
          • Become an Affiliate
          • MozCon
          • Webinars
          • Practical Marketer Series
          • MozPod
          Connect with us

          Contact the Help team

          Join our newsletter
          Moz logo
          © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
          • Accessibility
          • Terms of Use
          • Privacy