The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4. Is this considered Black Hat?

    Is this considered Black Hat?

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4 3 157
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • rachaelpracht
      rachaelpracht last edited by

      So here is the website I’m looking at, it ranks #1 in keywords like used cars for sale billings mt, etc. I was trying to figure out how, because there is no content on the page! I am working on one of our sites to get it to rank better when I found this in my research.

      #1 http://prntscr.com/aoy0ho

      So I did a “view page source” to see how many times they’re using keywords and what they’re title and description tags are.

      #2 http://prntscr.com/aoy0w1

      WAIT WHAT…. WHERE IS THIS CONTENT?!

      #3 http://prntscr.com/aoy13o

      Then I found it…

      #4 http://prntscr.com/aoy1e8

      #5 http://prntscr.com/aoy1o8

      #6 http://prntscr.com/aoy1u1

      It doesn’t even read like real content. This has to be considered poor form. I'm not sure why it makes me so angry. What do you guys think?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • GlobeRunner
        GlobeRunner last edited by

        Generally I wouldn't consider that "black hat", although it is hiding the content on the page--which is against Google's Webmaster Guidelines. They've mentioned before that if you have content that is "hidden" like this to most users, the expanded content should be displayed in the expanded mode, not in the way it's being done here.

        This generally doesn't quality as being "black hat", though.

        rachaelpracht 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • rachaelpracht
          rachaelpracht @GlobeRunner last edited by

          It definitely seems shady. I wasn't sure if this was considered "hiding" or "cloaking" because you can easily find the text when you view the source (and I assume that looks more like what the search engines are viewing ) but you have to click several times and you have to know where to look to find it.

          https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66353?hl=en

          This is the article I found to correspond with it.

          Thanks for your feedback!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • RobertFisher
            RobertFisher last edited by

            The fact they are hiding content IMO this is black hat. But, don't get too caught up in it being black hat. I know your site and in most searches you are ahead of them. They have 4 backlinks all no followed. I think there are things you could do on other pages on your site to push them down and end up with more than one page on the SERP.

            Go get em!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • 1 / 1
            • First post
              Last post
            • Is this White hat or Black Hat
              GlobeRunner
              GlobeRunner
              1
              4
              240

            • Would you consider this thin content?
              adamxj2
              adamxj2
              0
              3
              594

            • Progressive JPEGs. Wondering if I should consider it OR not?
              Malika1
              Malika1
              0
              3
              528

            • I am being black hat SEO'd by another company. What should I do?
              K-WINTER
              K-WINTER
              0
              5
              251

            • Why are these pages considered duplicate content?
              ChiarynMiranda
              ChiarynMiranda
              0
              6
              311

            • Black Hat :(
              josh-riley
              josh-riley
              0
              7
              371

            • Is this considered as a SEO Cloaking?
              MarieHaynes
              MarieHaynes
              0
              5
              416

            • Any experience regarding what % is considered duplicate?
              AdoptionHelp
              AdoptionHelp
              0
              2
              671

            Get started with Moz Pro!

            Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

            Start my free trial
            Products
            • Moz Pro
            • Moz Local
            • Moz API
            • Moz Data
            • STAT
            • Product Updates
            Moz Solutions
            • SMB Solutions
            • Agency Solutions
            • Enterprise Solutions
            • Digital Marketers
            Free SEO Tools
            • Domain Authority Checker
            • Link Explorer
            • Keyword Explorer
            • Competitive Research
            • Brand Authority Checker
            • Local Citation Checker
            • MozBar Extension
            • MozCast
            Resources
            • Blog
            • SEO Learning Center
            • Help Hub
            • Beginner's Guide to SEO
            • How-to Guides
            • Moz Academy
            • API Docs
            About Moz
            • About
            • Team
            • Careers
            • Contact
            Why Moz
            • Case Studies
            • Testimonials
            Get Involved
            • Become an Affiliate
            • MozCon
            • Webinars
            • Practical Marketer Series
            • MozPod
            Connect with us

            Contact the Help team

            Join our newsletter
            Moz logo
            © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
            • Accessibility
            • Terms of Use
            • Privacy