The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. White Hat / Black Hat SEO
    4. SEO results hacked?

    SEO results hacked?

    White Hat / Black Hat SEO
    14 4 733
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • MarcelMoz
      MarcelMoz last edited by

      Hi there,

      Since last Saturday I noticed a big traffic drop on at least the following two pages:
      http://www.smartphonehoesjes.nl/apple/ and http://www.smartphonehoesjes.nl/apple/iphone-6/.

      I did some research and I noticed something realy strange. Unknown sites seems to hijacked my organic results by using the exact same page title and META description but leading traffic to another their domain. Look at those pictures: http://imgur.com/v6kglLU and http://imgur.com/Whx4l8K.

      Edit: a competitor seems to have a same problem: http://imgur.com/Zzhter4. I just fetched both URL's in GWT as Google. In Bing there is a little sign of this problem too, so this is not a Google only thing.

      Can anybody please help me here? This has cost me some real money since Saturday.

      Tnx in advance.

      Marcel

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • PatrickDelehanty
        PatrickDelehanty last edited by

        Hi Marcel

        Quick question - I know you said "unknown", but are you sure that this site has nothing to do with your site? Like, did they develop or design your site at all?

        Here is a help section from Google on these sorts of issues - it covers everything from cloaking to content scraping, and doorway pages to other spam types.

        I would try contacting the webmaster of this site and asking them to remove your titles/meta descriptions. If they do not respond, or are not willing to cooperate, reference the resource above as Google has steps to take to ensure action is taken against sites that do this sort of thing.

        Hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions or need more help, good luck!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • MattAntonino
          MattAntonino last edited by

          Their Google cache results were somehow corrupted temporarily:

          http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wearemash.com%2F

          There's a VWO code in there:

          So it looks like they were split testing. The canonical is set to their domain which is why they took over results temporarily on these search terms.

          It looks like the split test somehow grabbed your page info & theirs and split tested it giving theirs a canonical on your content.  That would do it.

          Are you using VWO?  Are you using these guys to do your conversion optimisation? You may have the same conversion company who made a mistake or you may have the same VWO designer.  I'm not sure how it got there but looking at the code, VWO does look to probably factor into the problem.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • MarcelMoz
            MarcelMoz last edited by

            Hi Matt-POP,

            Thanks for this opening, didn't look at it this way. All our domains got replaced by wearemesh in the cached page. The VWO code looks like ours, so do you really think they were testing? All of the source code is ours, also the canonical, only the domain got replaced by theirs..

            We are using VWO but we are doing it by ourself. I'm not sure VWO is the problem.

            This problem occured last Saturday. What we did on Friday is make our website mobile friendly for the scheduled 21st of April mobile Google update. Is this coincidence? The two companies who helped us with this change, made some changes to the canonical tags among other things.

            A strange thing here is that a competitor has a same problem, wouldn't that seem like a conscious action (hack)?

            @Patrick: We don't know them, for sure. If you go to the unkknown website, you see that they don't use our meta data, so that's the strange part.

            Update: the domain www.wearemesh.com now redirects to www.ovsee.com, the same website you got redirected to when you click on the hacked result of the competitor I wrote about. The visual URL there is Finan.nl. This Ovsee.com looks like the perpetrator. But I still can't get a grip on it.. the other hacked result leads to www.planchemag.com which redirects to http://planchemag.fr.

            What can I do to get my results back? I already filed a spam report in GWT.

            Thanks again,
            Marcel

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DirkC
              DirkC last edited by

              Hi Marcel,

              It seems to be a plague recently- there where similar cases on Moz the last two weeks: http://moz.com/community/q/chinese-site-ranking-for-our-brand-name-possible-hack (similar situation as you) - a site being hacked http://moz.com/community/q/getting-different-search-queries-in-google-webmaster. It seems the hackers are exploiting a vulnerability in the slider used on these Wordpress site.

              Apart from filing spam reports there is not much more you can do. You could inform the site owners that their site has been hacked & ask them to clean it, but I fear that these hackers are capable to switch sites quite fast.

              Good luck,

              Dirk

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • MarcelMoz
                MarcelMoz last edited by

                Hi Dirk,

                This should be a Google task to prevent her customers/users from those kind of hackers right?

                Do you think that redirecting my iPhone 6 page to a new URL would help? I can imagine the hackers hijacked an URL, when I pick a new one and 301 redirect the old one to the new, will my own result show up again?

                I already spoke with Google this morning and they are going to look after it.

                Marcel

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DirkC
                  DirkC last edited by

                  Hi Marcel,

                  Don't think that it will change a lot. If the hack is done in the same way as the other cases (which seems to be the case), they copied your entire site into the site which has been hacked. They present this version to Google (cloaking - as you can see in the cached version) - but "normal" visitors are redirected to a different e-commerce site. To make sure the hacked site is positioned well, they point hundreds of links from other hacked sites to the cloned version of your site. So whatever you change on your site, will not impact the cloned version, which will keep it's position, until Google takes action.

                  It's a quite a simple trick, and to be very honest, I am surprised that Google is not capable to detect it.

                  rgds,

                  Dirk

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • MarcelMoz
                    MarcelMoz last edited by

                    Hi Dirk,

                    I just set the redirect, just to be sure. This is a realy bad thing, people can abuse Google to negatively impact a whole company and lots of individuals. That should not be possible, hope Google will fix this soon!

                    You assume the whole site will go down in Google and not only those two pages? This will be terrible.

                    Marcel

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DirkC
                      DirkC last edited by

                      Hi Marcel,

                      If I do a site:www.wearemash.com there seem to be only 2 pages from your site indexed at the moment - possible that the other ones haven't been picked-up by Google yet. Quite ironical that the domain wearemash.com belongs to a web design company.

                      rgds,

                      Dirk

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • MarcelMoz
                        MarcelMoz last edited by

                        Hi Dirk,

                        That second result is our homepage, I see that this one got indexed at the exact same time our own homepage got indexed. However, Google shows our (the good one!) homepage in the search results.

                        That's quite ironical indeed, the webdesign company.

                        The other result redirects to planchemag.com, which only gives one result on a site:www.planchemag.com/. What about this one?
                        Is it possible this hack only limits to those two pages?

                        I used the tool copyscape.com and it seem to be only the following pages that are affected:

                        http://imgur.com/YVFcZsM

                        What about this one: search for site:soft-solutions.nl and you'll find our iPhone 5/5s pagina. Search for 'iPhone 5 hoesje' and Google shows our correct page as a result. How is this possible?

                        Marcel

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DirkC
                          DirkC last edited by

                          Hi Marcel,

                          I have the impression that soft-solutions.nl already discovered that they have been hacked & have cleaned their site in the mean time.

                          It's possible that the hacker only copied 1/2 pages - it's however more likely that they copied the full site but that the other pages haven't been indexed yet. Idem for copyscape - if the hack only occurred recently, these tools (and Google) haven't been able to pickup all pages yet.

                          When I search for 'iphone 6 hoesje' I get the planchemag.com site. As all these pages are duplicates, it's Google who's deciding which page it's going to show. Google decided that in some cases the hacked version is the preferred one, for other queries people will still get to your site. It probably depends on the anchors the hackers used to the hacked site. The volume of iphone 6 is probably higher than iphone 5 queries, so they will probably have used anchors containing 'iphone 6' to point to the site.

                          Dirk

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • MarcelMoz
                            MarcelMoz last edited by

                            Hi Dirk,

                            Let's hope the hacker only copied a few pages and not the entire site. What could a site like soft-solutions possibly do to clean their site? I think it's worth a chance to ask planchemag and wearemash to do the same. My new URL shows up if you search for 'iphone 6 / 6s hoesje', that's something positive. I filed a request for deletion of the old and hacked URL of the iPhone 6 page, hopefully Google throws it out and picks up the new and clean one like it does with the other search query.

                            I can do nothing but wait now I guess. I will keep you updated here.

                            Marcel

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DirkC
                              DirkC last edited by

                              Marcel,

                              When you contact the site owners - a good guideline on 'how to clean' can be found here: https://codex.wordpress.org/FAQ_My_site_was_hacked (specifically for Wordpress) - more in general: http://www.google.com/webmasters/hacked/ - it could be that the hackers gained access by a security issue with the slider (http://wptavern.com/critical-security-vulnerability-found-in-wordpress-slider-revolution-plugin-immediate-update-advised) so they should certainly check that Wordpress & it's plugins are up-to-date.

                              Good luck!

                              Dirk

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • MarcelMoz
                                MarcelMoz last edited by

                                Hi Dirk,

                                After contacting Google by phone and mail, filing a few more spam reports and refreshing textual content, we got our results back and traffic/revenue has grown since. We are very happy, and no other pages got attacked (yet).

                                Thanks for your help.

                                Marcel

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • 1 / 1
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                • Domain SEO
                                  effectdigital
                                  effectdigital
                                  1
                                  5
                                  101

                                • Does ID's in URL is good for SEO? Will SEO Submissions sites allow such urls submissions?
                                  RobinJA
                                  RobinJA
                                  0
                                  4
                                  812

                                • Pharma Hack/Grey hat SEO. Cannot get site to rank, tons of incoming bad links
                                  CleverPhD
                                  CleverPhD
                                  0
                                  6
                                  524

                                • Negative SEO
                                  MickEdwards
                                  MickEdwards
                                  0
                                  2
                                  143

                                • Negative SEO? Or?
                                  BlueprintMarketing
                                  BlueprintMarketing
                                  0
                                  8
                                  243

                                • SEO plan
                                  TakeshiYoung
                                  TakeshiYoung
                                  0
                                  3
                                  769

                                • SEO best practice: Use tags for SEO purpose? To add or not to add to Sitemap?
                                  BWrightTLM
                                  BWrightTLM
                                  0
                                  14
                                  457

                                • Negative SEO - Case Studies Prove Results. De-rank your competitors
                                  MattJanaway
                                  MattJanaway
                                  0
                                  8
                                  3.6k

                                Get started with Moz Pro!

                                Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                                Start my free trial
                                Products
                                • Moz Pro
                                • Moz Local
                                • Moz API
                                • Moz Data
                                • STAT
                                • Product Updates
                                Moz Solutions
                                • SMB Solutions
                                • Agency Solutions
                                • Enterprise Solutions
                                • Digital Marketers
                                Free SEO Tools
                                • Domain Authority Checker
                                • Link Explorer
                                • Keyword Explorer
                                • Competitive Research
                                • Brand Authority Checker
                                • Local Citation Checker
                                • MozBar Extension
                                • MozCast
                                Resources
                                • Blog
                                • SEO Learning Center
                                • Help Hub
                                • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                                • How-to Guides
                                • Moz Academy
                                • API Docs
                                About Moz
                                • About
                                • Team
                                • Careers
                                • Contact
                                Why Moz
                                • Case Studies
                                • Testimonials
                                Get Involved
                                • Become an Affiliate
                                • MozCon
                                • Webinars
                                • Practical Marketer Series
                                • MozPod
                                Connect with us

                                Contact the Help team

                                Join our newsletter
                                Moz logo
                                © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                                • Accessibility
                                • Terms of Use
                                • Privacy