The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. On-Page / Site Optimization
    4. Duplicate anchor text vs poor relevance in internal links

    Duplicate anchor text vs poor relevance in internal links

    On-Page / Site Optimization
    4 2 1.6k
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • BandLeader
      BandLeader last edited by

      We're writing a number of blog posts, all based around a particular head-term (call it "women's widgets"). Each post will be centered around a different long-tail keyword (e.g. "women's brandA widgets", "women's brandB widgets", "women's type1 widgets", etc.).  We want to link from the blog posts back to the main "women's widgets" category-level page on our site.  Should we:

      a) Use the words "women's widgets" in each blog post and link that to the "women's widgets" page? This would be the most relevant, but it also seems like using the same anchor text on all of the posts, and linking to the main page, is not good since Google doesn't like seeing the same exact anchor text all the time, right?

      b) Link the long-tail keyword ("women's brandA widgets") to the main "women's widgets" page?  That would solve the anchor text duplication issue, but then the anchor text doesn't seem relevant to the page being linked to (it might never mention "brandA" on that main page at all), and I think it would also hurt the blog post's chances of ranking for the long-tail keyword since we're basically saying that there's a more relevant page for that keyword somewhere else (i.e. you shouldn't link out from a page using the phrase you're trying to optimize that page for).

      c) Link a nearby word/phrase instead? For example, we could say "Trust Companyname.com for your women's widget needs", and link "Companyname.com" to the "women's widget" page.  By proximity to the keyword phrase, that may help a bit, but again the relevancy of the anchor text to the page being linked to is fairly low. I'd hate to have a bunch of "click here", "read this" or "company name" anchor texts being used, just in the name of not overusing the head-term in the anchor text.

      Are we just missing something, or misunderstanding Google's preferences? What do you do when you don't want to overuse a keyword in anchor text, but you still want to link to a main category-level page using the head-term in order to tell Google that that is the most relevant, best page for that keyword? Is anchor text duplication more of a problem for external backlinks, and less of an issue for internal interlinking? Do you have a different suggestion, other than what I outlined above?

      Thanks for the help!
      John

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • WhoWuddaThunk
        WhoWuddaThunk last edited by

        A) Is it Women's Widgets used naturally in the posts?  If you are going to use the phrase you might as well link with it.  While you don't want every link on the site to have the same exact anchor text, the threshold for onsite is very, very high.  It's when you get to offsite links where things get messy quickly.

        B) I would not link with the long tail.  This would be like claiming that you are the best golfer in the room, but then telling everyone that this other person is the best golfer in the roof.  Doing it once probably wouldn't be a big deal, but I always aim to keep on the safe side of things.

        C) I wouldn't use your company name as the link, but you could use words in close proximity.  This could help keep things well rounded.

        Another thing to consider is the overall frequency.  If you have 5 pages using the exact match link, assuming it can be used naturally, then it isn't a big deal.  If you have 20+, then I would definitely consider keeping things well rounded with proximity links.

        BandLeader 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • BandLeader
          BandLeader @WhoWuddaThunk last edited by

          That's basically what I was thinking as well, and I appreciate knowing I'm on the right track. What do you think about varying the anchor text by including nearby words like this (links would be the underlined text)?:

          Brandname is one of the many brands who make women’s widgets.

          For more information, visit our page about women’s widgets and check out the other brands.

          If you’re considering buying women’s widgets, you can’t go wrong with Brandname widgets.

          Thanks!
          John

          WhoWuddaThunk 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • WhoWuddaThunk
            WhoWuddaThunk @BandLeader last edited by

            Those are good ways to add variant keyword links to those pages.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • 1 / 1
            • First post
              Last post
            • Is this still considered true about INTERNAL anchor text? "Penguin seems to be targeting overly aggressive anchor text (both internally and externally), especially from low-quality sources."
              MarieHaynes
              MarieHaynes
              0
              8
              191

            • Internal Links: Navigation Bar vs. Body Text
              nyc-seo
              nyc-seo
              0
              3
              577

            • Internal Followed Links and Total Internal Links as 1
              ChiarynMiranda
              ChiarynMiranda
              0
              3
              987

            • What image attribute should carry "anchor text" for internal linking
              qurve
              qurve
              0
              3
              536

            • Anchor text on outbound links on a blog, relevancy detrimental or positive?
              mjtaylor
              mjtaylor
              0
              2
              505

            • Change Homepage internal Link from Image to Targeted Anchor Text -- Spam??
              DanHill
              DanHill
              0
              5
              580

            • Is anchor text link juice passed in internal links?
              knichol
              knichol
              0
              3
              782

            • Lots of links on homepage to internal pages with keyword rich anchor text - problem?
              Andy.Drinkwater
              Andy.Drinkwater
              0
              4
              1.1k

            Get started with Moz Pro!

            Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

            Start my free trial
            Products
            • Moz Pro
            • Moz Local
            • Moz API
            • Moz Data
            • STAT
            • Product Updates
            Moz Solutions
            • SMB Solutions
            • Agency Solutions
            • Enterprise Solutions
            • Digital Marketers
            Free SEO Tools
            • Domain Authority Checker
            • Link Explorer
            • Keyword Explorer
            • Competitive Research
            • Brand Authority Checker
            • Local Citation Checker
            • MozBar Extension
            • MozCast
            Resources
            • Blog
            • SEO Learning Center
            • Help Hub
            • Beginner's Guide to SEO
            • How-to Guides
            • Moz Academy
            • API Docs
            About Moz
            • About
            • Team
            • Careers
            • Contact
            Why Moz
            • Case Studies
            • Testimonials
            Get Involved
            • Become an Affiliate
            • MozCon
            • Webinars
            • Practical Marketer Series
            • MozPod
            Connect with us

            Contact the Help team

            Join our newsletter
            Moz logo
            © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
            • Accessibility
            • Terms of Use
            • Privacy