The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Search Engine Trends
    4. Is it bad from an SEO perspective that cached AMP pages are hosted on domains other than the original publisher's?

    Is it bad from an SEO perspective that cached AMP pages are hosted on domains other than the original publisher's?

    Search Engine Trends
    3 2 119
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Brian_Dowd
      Brian_Dowd last edited by

      Hello Moz,

      I am thinking about starting to utilize AMP for some of my website. I've been researching this AMP situation for the better part of a year and I am still unclear on a few things.

      What I am primarily concerned with in terms of AMP and SEO is whether or not the original publisher gets credit for the traffic to a cached AMP page that is hosted elsewhere. I can see the possible issues with this from an SEO perspective and I am pretty sure I have read about how SEOs are unhappy about this particular aspect of AMP in other places.

      On the AMP project FAQ page you can find this, but there is very little explanation:

      "Do publishers receive credit for the traffic from a measurement perspective?
      Yes, an AMP file is the same as the rest of your site – this space is the publisher’s canvas."

      So, let's say you have an AMP page on your website example.com:
      example.com/amp_document.html

      And a cached copy is served with a URL format similar to this: https://google.com/amp/example.com/amp_document.html

      Then how does the original publisher get the credit for the traffic? Is it because there is a canonical tag from the AMP version to the original HTML version?

      Also, while I am at it, how does an AMP page actually get into Google's AMP Cache (or any other cache)? Does Google crawl the original HTML page, find the AMP version and then just decide to cache it from there? Are there any other issues with this that I should be aware of?

      Thanks

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Martijn_Scheijbeler
        Martijn_Scheijbeler last edited by

        Hi Brian,

        Well, the AMP page will have a canonical URL leading back to the original page. This will take care of the credits to the original page.

        Martijn.

        Brian_Dowd 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • Brian_Dowd
          Brian_Dowd @Martijn_Scheijbeler last edited by

          Thanks Martijn. I figured that was probably the answer, however, there seemed to be some hubbub over this issue, so I was wondering if there are any other issues regarding AMP pages being hosted elsewhere.

          Do you have any insight you could share in that regard?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • 1 / 1
          • First post
            Last post
          • Does Google considers the cached content of a page if it's redirected to new page?
            0
            1
            32

          • Linking from high ranking sub domain pages to less ranking main domain pages to benefit latter
            Linda-Vassily
            Linda-Vassily
            0
            4
            36

          • Bad Grammar's Effect on Rankings
            Katarina-Borovska
            Katarina-Borovska
            1
            6
            116

          • AMP pages - should we be creating AMP versions of all site pages?
            bridget.randolph
            bridget.randolph
            1
            3
            679

          • What's better for seo, NOINDEX, or INDEX
            BlueprintMarketing
            BlueprintMarketing
            0
            3
            218

          • Bing's indexed pages vs pages appearing in results
            KristinaKledzik
            KristinaKledzik
            0
            9
            2.2k

          • Duplicate Pate Content - 404's or 301's?
            donford
            donford
            0
            4
            369

          • How did a competitor's brand name get in google's related search list?
            jhogan80
            jhogan80
            1
            3
            1.1k

          Get started with Moz Pro!

          Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

          Start my free trial
          Products
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Local
          • Moz API
          • Moz Data
          • STAT
          • Product Updates
          Moz Solutions
          • SMB Solutions
          • Agency Solutions
          • Enterprise Solutions
          • Digital Marketers
          Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Authority Checker
          • Link Explorer
          • Keyword Explorer
          • Competitive Research
          • Brand Authority Checker
          • Local Citation Checker
          • MozBar Extension
          • MozCast
          Resources
          • Blog
          • SEO Learning Center
          • Help Hub
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO
          • How-to Guides
          • Moz Academy
          • API Docs
          About Moz
          • About
          • Team
          • Careers
          • Contact
          Why Moz
          • Case Studies
          • Testimonials
          Get Involved
          • Become an Affiliate
          • MozCon
          • Webinars
          • Practical Marketer Series
          • MozPod
          Connect with us

          Contact the Help team

          Join our newsletter
          Moz logo
          © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
          • Accessibility
          • Terms of Use
          • Privacy