Question about understanding Google Ranking System

Yes I know pinkcherry.ca have some more number of backlinks than us, but not that much high as compare to our website. But hushcanada have very fewer number of backlinks, but if you see, their rankings are even better than pinkcherry and our website. For many keywords (such as sex toys, sex toys online, sex shop) they rank on first page.

Regarding backlinks anchor text, no website have anchor rich backlinks, most of anchor texts are irrelevant to keywords. I checked using Hrefs and Majestic SEO too.

As you said something wrong on my onpage, whats wrong are you saying about. I did not do any different things.

Thank you.

max.favilli

If I look at your backlink profile with ahrefs, there's few I don't like, I am referring to anchortexts stuffed with keywords which doesn't look natural to me, and I assume google would not consider them natural either.

Your competitor pinkcherry doesn't look much better, but that should not give you much comfort. And btw they have much more linking root domains so they beat you anyhow.

It's the on page which is really an issue in my opinion. Just starting with following advices from MOZ page grader would help a lot.

Take this page http://www.cupidboutique.com/vibrators which I assume from your early comment you would like to see ranked better than your competitors for the keyword "vibrators", and look at the source code. Starting from the head there's a lot I don't like, if you want to rank for vibrators, trim the title, that megamenu is overkilling with external links, the keyword density is overwhelming, and 50 h2 tag are simply too much. And content is thin.

You should rethink it. If you look at hushcanada.com page source for their best ranking results for the keyword vibrators you will see it's much much much better.

Pinkcherry rules because of the links, hushcanada beat you because of their onpage.

moonheart

Hi,

Thank you for your reply. I don't understand what you say by "that megamenu is overkilling with external links". Can you please explain what you mean by that?

You are saying about pagegrader and onpage SEO of Hushcanada.

This website is ranking for different keywords like "sex toys", "sex toys online", "sex shop", "sex store".

But no any keyword phrase they even mentioned on any part of their website. Only "sex toy" keyword has been mentioned on title tag. For each keyword Moz page grader gave "F" grade. For a low competitive keyword it can be acceptable, but they are ranking with such a high competitive keyword.

There are some more niche, that I am seeing this type of ranking puzzle. Do you think that Google take some other major metrics to rank a website?

max.favilli

That megamenu is giving that page too many external links.

Choose a main keyword for each page and optimize for it, choose some (few sematically related) secondary keywords and try to optimize the page for them without jeopardaizing the first.

Please go again through MOZ guides and blog post and very nice whiteboard friday videos to better understand what "optimize" mean.

Once done if you will look back at the source code of those pages you will notice yourself they don't smell nicely.

Depending on the keyword competition level you may need to get some backlinks for those keywords, which means generate good quality links from relevant websites, within relevant content, without a spammy anchor, etc...

Work page by page, keyword by keyword. It's a long and draining process.

Dr-Pete

I'd tend to agree that the top menu is spreading link equity far and wide - I'm seeing something like 800 internal links from the home-page. It doesn't give Google any sense of hierarchy and could really be harming the top category pages from performing well.

This home-page size is also huge - I know that's not uncommon for an e-commerce site, but you've got something like 1MB just of Javascript and multiple 200K images. This isn't penalty-level stuff, but it can really weaken your ability to rank, and generally isn't great for conversion either. The giant scrolling banner images would be an easy thing to lose - I don't know of one UX/conversion person who thinks those are good for sales, and they just take a huge amount of code and load-time.

Dr-Pete

So, I've got you around #43 for "adult sex toys" (just to pick one), and PinkCherry.ca around #11.

It's tough, because there are a ton of sites in the first few pages with DA/PAs in the 20s-40s. This is a tricky range that covers a lot of sites - it's not particularly strong, and it can be easily skewed by bad links or hurt by technical issues.

I don't see any evidence of an outright penalty situation. I see a lot of small technical issues and sub-optimal on-page (such as the internal linking mentioned on Massimiliano's comments) that could make a difference, but it's hard to say how much of a difference.

At first glance, I do tend to agree that the link profile is dubious. I see a ton of free directory links, for example. They range from ok to things that look outright spammy, like:

http://seolinkcloud.org/Society_/Sexuality/?p=15

Now, any one of these directories by itself is no big deal, but if you have a link profile built on this stuff and a lack of a strong core to offset it, you can end up seeing your site devalued. Unfortunately, when you're in that 30s range for DA, this is a common problem - the strong links aren't strong enough to offset the moderately spammy links.

The good news is that I think some small-scale link clean-up, a focus on stronger/better links, and some technical changes could actually go a long way for you. I'm not seeing a smoking gun here (and admittedly Q&A can't replace a full audit), but mostly a lot of small things that may be adding up to harm the site.

moonheart

Guys,

Please lets talk about a specific topic. What you said about our website I will fix the things.

So I have some specific question on the websites that ranking high in this niche. As I said previously most of websites ranking in this niche, showing very few backlinks as well as low DA/PA and all scores showing as on majestic, Hrefs and open site explorer. What I guess they are either hiding the backlink data or there are something that I am not able to find out.

No# 1 website in this niche is spencersonline.com and this is vital that this website ranking on #1. All of their SEO score is very high as compare to other competitor's website.

Open Site Explorer Data for this website:

PA/DA: 61/68, Number of linking root domain: 3370, Facebook/Twitter/Google Plus sharing: 2830/1575/1141

Now I am showing you some websites that ranking on good position in this niche, with low score:

hotme.ca:
DA/PA: 24/28, Linking Root Domain: 14 Only, Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus sharing: 750/93/296

industrialuv.com
DA/PA: 25/37, Linking Root Domain: 40 Only, Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus sharing: 0/15/78

loveshop.ca
DA/PA: 20/30, Linking Root Domain: 24 Only, Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus sharing: 7/3/3

hushcanada.com
DA/PA: 22/30, Linking Root Domain: 23 Only, Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus sharing: 11/16/20

Can you think that a website with only 14 linking root domain can rank in such a high competitive niche. I am asking do these websites hiding their backlinks or are they doing unethical way to rank high?

max.favilli

First, I really think you are underestimating the importance of on-page optimization. If you read that backlinks are all that it matters, it's true, but given that the html code is not a mess. And even so, when comparing two websites with a similar backlink profile, the more on-page optimized wins.

Second, let's take hotme.ca, for which keywords are you analyzing its ranking?

Dr-Pete

I'm having trouble getting hotme.ca to rank for anything competitive - I can get it in #1 for "Toronto sex toys", but here you've got a strong local SEO impact, which could easily over-ride a lot of standard organic signals.

In most cases, it's not that they're hiding anything in their link profile, but one of a few explanations:

(1) Other sites have inflated PA/DA due to spammy links. We've just introduced spam scoring recently, but keep in mind that PA/DA are generally measures of overall ranking strength, and they don't account for quality/spam. In an industry where spammy is common, and especially when you've got tons of sites in the 20s and 30s, these numbers can leave out a lot.

(2) We're not crawling a lot of the weaker or lower-quality links. We tend to take a quality-over-quantity approach in MozScape, but if an entire industry relies on low-quality links, Google could be seeing more than we're seeing.

(3) Other factors are over-riding these link signals, as Massimiliano says. On-page is definitely one, technical issues is another, and local factors (as I mentioned above).

When someone is masking a link profile, what we usually see is that they're 301-redirecting other domains to that domain (and we aren't seeing those links directly). Typically, though we'd see those 301-redirects, and I'm not seeing that for hotme.ca.

Truth is, if they are doing something unethical, there's almost nothing you can do about it, unless it's flat-out illegal. In SEO, chasing your competitors bad behavior is almost always a completely waste of time - believe me, I've done it for clients (and it was a colossal waste of time and money). You have to focus on your site and what you can do.

Products

Moz Solutions

Free SEO Tools

Resources

About Moz

Why Moz

Get Involved

Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

Question about understanding Google Ranking System