The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4. Best to Fix Duplicate Content Issues on Blog If URLs are Set to "No-Index"

    Best to Fix Duplicate Content Issues on Blog If URLs are Set to "No-Index"

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    5 3 503
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Kingalan1
      Kingalan1 last edited by

      Greetings Moz Community:

      I purchased a  SEMrush subscription recently and used it to run a site audit.

      The audit detected 168 duplicate content issues mostly relating to blog posts tags. I suspect these issues may be due to canonical tags not being set up correctly.

      My developer claims that since these blog URLs are set to "no-index" these issues do not need to be corrected. My instinct would be to avoid any risk with potential duplicate content. To set up canonicalization correctly. In addition, even if these pages are set to "no-index" they are passing page rank. Further more I don't know why a reputable company like SEMrush would consider these errors if in fact they are not errors.

      So my question is, do we need to do anything with the error pages if they are already set to "no-index"? Incidentally the site URL is www.nyc-officespace-leader.com. I am attaching a copy of the  SEMrush audit.

      Thanks, Alan

      BarjWaO SqVXYMy

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • reserve123
        reserve123 last edited by

        I would remove them, to be safe.  Google sees them regardless of the "no-index", and I think that the cleaner you can get your data, the better off you will be in the long run.  While there may be no harm at this time, things always change.  I know one thing for sure, and that is that you don't want a duplicate content issue.

        Kingalan1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Kingalan1
          Kingalan1 @reserve123 last edited by

          Hi Reserve:

          Thanks for your response.

          Google is able to view this content because of links that go to and from it? So I am not protected by the no-index tag?

          I am very unfamiliar with the strange tags generated by Wordpress. Do you think that such tags as the following can be removed without any detrimental effect? If the URLS for these tags are removed should there be redirects added? http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/tag/boutique-space, http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/tag/meatpacking-district, http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/tag/restaurant-space, http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/tag/retail-space, http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/tag/store-space, http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/tag/the-plaza-district, http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/tag/times-square, http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/tag/chelsea, http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/tag/upper-east-side, http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/tag/upper-west-side

          Also, should canonical tags be added to blog URLs even if they are set to no-index? For example:

          http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/page/2

          http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/page/3

          http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/page/4

          Thanks, Alan

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DennisSeymour
            DennisSeymour last edited by

            I encounter sometimes that with my clients. The basic thing to do is just to add a canonical since they are already noindexed especially for themes that utilize certain pages within a page. Crazy sounding but some themes actually does this so you can't remove the duplicate page, so noindexing it then adding a canonical is already good enough.

            But since you mentioned these are just tags, then simply noindexing them is fine. (I'm assuming these are just basic wordpress tags)

            As for your pagination question, use a canonical to link to a URL where all the posts are shown. That's the basic rule for that situation and it's somewhere in Google guidelines about pagination 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • reserve123
              reserve123 last edited by

              Thanks for cleaning that up, Dennis.  That is great advice.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • 1 / 1
              • First post
                Last post
              • How to fix Duplicate Content Warnings on Pagination? Indexed Pagination?
                Everett
                Everett
                0
                3
                375

              • Best to Combine Listing URLs? Are 300 Listing Pages a "Thin Content" Risk?
                julie-getonthemap
                julie-getonthemap
                0
                4
                88

              • Does Google View "SRC", "HREF", TITLE and Alt tags as Duplicate Content on Home Page Slider?
                Cyrus-Shepard
                Cyrus-Shepard
                0
                2
                711

              • "No Index, No Follow" or No Index, Follow" for URLs with Thin Content?
                PaddyDisplays
                PaddyDisplays
                0
                4
                1.4k

              • HELP! How does one prevent regional pages as being counted as "duplicate content," "duplicate meta descriptions," et cetera...?
                Alex-Harford
                Alex-Harford
                0
                2
                107

              • Are all duplicate content issues bad? (Blog article Tags)
                Daniel_B
                Daniel_B
                0
                7
                149

              • "Category" word in URLs of blog is it SEO Friendly URL ??
                sourabhrana39
                sourabhrana39
                0
                5
                272

              • ECommerce products duplicate content issues - is rel="canonical" the answer?
                Confetti_Wedding
                Confetti_Wedding
                0
                4
                783

              Get started with Moz Pro!

              Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

              Start my free trial
              Products
              • Moz Pro
              • Moz Local
              • Moz API
              • Moz Data
              • STAT
              • Product Updates
              Moz Solutions
              • SMB Solutions
              • Agency Solutions
              • Enterprise Solutions
              • Digital Marketers
              Free SEO Tools
              • Domain Authority Checker
              • Link Explorer
              • Keyword Explorer
              • Competitive Research
              • Brand Authority Checker
              • Local Citation Checker
              • MozBar Extension
              • MozCast
              Resources
              • Blog
              • SEO Learning Center
              • Help Hub
              • Beginner's Guide to SEO
              • How-to Guides
              • Moz Academy
              • API Docs
              About Moz
              • About
              • Team
              • Careers
              • Contact
              Why Moz
              • Case Studies
              • Testimonials
              Get Involved
              • Become an Affiliate
              • MozCon
              • Webinars
              • Practical Marketer Series
              • MozPod
              Connect with us

              Contact the Help team

              Join our newsletter
              Moz logo
              © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
              • Accessibility
              • Terms of Use
              • Privacy