The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4. Crawl Issue Found: No rel="canonical" Tags

    Crawl Issue Found: No rel="canonical" Tags

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4 3 1.1k
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • fdmgroup
      fdmgroup last edited by

      Given that google have stated that duplicate content is not penalised is this really something that will give sufficient benefits for the time involved?Also, reading some of the articles  on moz.com they seem very ambivalent about its use – for example http://moz.com/blog/rel-confused-answers-to-your-rel-canonical-questionsWill any page with a canonical link normally NOT be indexed by google?Thanks.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • KarlBantleman
        KarlBantleman last edited by

        A canonical tag tells Google that you are aware of the duplicate content that exists on your website and you are telling Google which page to count as the authority. Pages with a canonical tag WILL be indexed.

        Websites with duplicate content can, have and will be penalised by Google, that is what Panda is all about. The canonical tag does fix this in the majority of times but if there is a way of removing any duplicate content then this is advisable.

        fdmgroup 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • fdmgroup
          fdmgroup @KarlBantleman last edited by

          Thanks. Should I add the canonical tag to all pages on the website? And how do I do this in WordPress SEO?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • David-Kley
            David-Kley last edited by

            Google has stated that duplicate content will be penalized, if it is deemed that the content is meant to manipulate search results. https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66359

            "In the rare cases in which Google perceives that duplicate content may be shown with intent to manipulate our rankings and deceive our users, we'll also make appropriate adjustments in the indexing and ranking of the sites involved. As a result, the ranking of the site may suffer, or the site might be removed entirely from the Google index, in which case it will no longer appear in search results."

            If two pages both have the same content, even with a canoical url Google will choose which one to index most likely the newer version of that page.
            "Google tries hard to index and show pages with distinct information. This filtering means, for instance, that if your site has a "regular" and "printer" version of each article, and neither of these is blocked with a noindex meta tag, we'll choose one of them to list."

            I would not recommend having duplicate content on your site if it can be avoided. If it can't, set one of the pages you dont want indexed to "no-index".

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • 1 / 1
            • First post
              Last post
            • What is the difference between link rel="canonical" and meta name="canonical"?
              Ideas-Money-Art
              Ideas-Money-Art
              0
              3
              1.3k

            • Bad use of the Rel="canonical" tag
              Brian-H
              Brian-H
              0
              4
              554

            • Rel="canonical" questions?
              DoRM
              DoRM
              0
              13
              656

            • SEOMoz Shows Issue with Rel="canonical" - Not seeing Issue on Actual Pages
              UnderRugSwept
              UnderRugSwept
              0
              3
              355

            • What is the proper syntax for rel="canonical" ??
              danatanseo
              danatanseo
              0
              11
              11.2k

            • Pagination: rel="next" rel="prev" in ?
              beck398
              beck398
              1
              5
              4.0k

            • Proper use and coding of rel = "canonical" tag
              jeffreytrull1
              jeffreytrull1
              0
              5
              924

            • How permanent is a rel="canonical"?
              CoreyTisdale
              CoreyTisdale
              0
              3
              855

            Get started with Moz Pro!

            Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

            Start my free trial
            Products
            • Moz Pro
            • Moz Local
            • Moz API
            • Moz Data
            • STAT
            • Product Updates
            Moz Solutions
            • SMB Solutions
            • Agency Solutions
            • Enterprise Solutions
            • Digital Marketers
            Free SEO Tools
            • Domain Authority Checker
            • Link Explorer
            • Keyword Explorer
            • Competitive Research
            • Brand Authority Checker
            • Local Citation Checker
            • MozBar Extension
            • MozCast
            Resources
            • Blog
            • SEO Learning Center
            • Help Hub
            • Beginner's Guide to SEO
            • How-to Guides
            • Moz Academy
            • API Docs
            About Moz
            • About
            • Team
            • Careers
            • Contact
            Why Moz
            • Case Studies
            • Testimonials
            Get Involved
            • Become an Affiliate
            • MozCon
            • Webinars
            • Practical Marketer Series
            • MozPod
            Connect with us

            Contact the Help team

            Join our newsletter
            Moz logo
            © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
            • Accessibility
            • Terms of Use
            • Privacy