Sitemap Question - Should I exclude or make a separate sitemap for Old URL's

[Southbay_Carnivorous_Plants]

So basically, my website is very old... 1995 Old.  Extremely old content still shows up when people search for things that are outdated by 10-15+ years , I decided not to drop redirects on some of the irrelevant pages.  People still hit the pages, but bounce...

I have about 400 pages that I don't want to delete or redirect.  Many of them have old backlinks and hold some value but do interfere with my new relevant content.

If I dropped these pages into a sitemap, set the priority to zero would that possibly help?  No redirects, content is still valid for people looking for it, but maybe these old pages don't show up above my new content?

Currently the old stuff is excluded from all sitemaps.. I don't want to make one and have it make the problem worse. Any advise is appreciated.

Thx

[FedeEinhorn]

I don't think messing with your sitemap will work. Google serves what they think is better to the user, even if it is old content.

You have several options here to go for:

• Make a full sitemap automatically that will assign priority automatically like the one provided by xml-sitemaps.com (incredible software in my personal opinion and well worth the money).
• Update the content on those pages you say it's outdated. I think Google prefers serving pages that have huge value instead of "new", therefore, updating the content of those pages may decrease your bounce rate.
• While on the old pages, link to the new posts that include the new info. You can even put something like "This content is outdated, for the up-to-date version, click here" and link to the most appropriate new page, you keep the page, no 301s and pass some juice to the new page.

I think the best would be to use the 1st and 2nd options in conjunction. Or 1st and 3rd if the content of the "old" pages have something that updating them will loose their value.

In any case, I wouldn't leave pages out of the sitemap. The software I mentioned automatically assigns priority as to "how deep the page is in your site" (links it needed to follow to reach that page, older pages will surely need more clicks to reach to them).

Hope that helps.

[Southbay_Carnivorous_Plants]

Good plan actually, I appreciate it.  I dev'd my own sitemap script but agree xml-sitemaps works great.  I suggest that to friends & clients needing an easy solution.

Giving the analytics... I did't want to update roughly 400 pages.  However, you handed me my resolution... I'll wrap the old pages with my up to date header/footer & just make some banners that direct traffic to the updated website.

Note: Making a basketball/shoe analogy...  Just assume I'm selling Nike Shoes & traffic lands on my 1995,1996,1997 etc Charles Barkley pages.  I don't sell shoes, and my query reports & analytics show people arent searching for Barkley but because of the age and trust of my page, engines still point them there.

Anyway, I appreciate it a lot.  Over complicated things this time !

[FedeEinhorn]

You are welcome!

Still get that traffic in the move It's free traffic, try to make the most out of it. Find the best way to point them in the direction you need them to go always keeping an eye in being as friendly and natural as possible.

[Southbay_Carnivorous_Plants]

Sending you a PM