Broken sitemaps vs no sitemaps at all?

[edmundsseo]

The site I am working on is enormous. We have 71 sitemap files, all linked to from a sitemap index file.

The sitemaps are not up to par with "best practices" yet, and realistically it may be another month or so until we get them cleaned up.

I'm wondering if, for the time being, we should just remove the sitemaps from Webmaster Tools altogether. They are currently "broken", and I know that sitemaps are not mandatory. Perhaps they're doing more harm than good at this point? According to Webmaster Tools, there are 8,398,082 "warnings" associated with the sitemap, many of which seem to be related to URLs being linked to that are blocked by robots.txt.

I was thinking that I could remove them and then keep a close eye on the crawl errors/index status to see if anything changes.

Is there any reason why I shouldn't remove these from Webmaster Tools until we get the sitemaps up to par with best practices?

[smarties954]

I think you can remove the sitemap since it returns so many warnings.

I don't think sitemaps have so much seo benefits but rather helps google find pages that are hard to find in your site or no accessible through regular href.

So make sure your site has a good structure and that all page can be found by browsing your site (click on links from pages to pages) and you will be fine sitemap or not.

Use linksleuth to crawl your site, if you are not sure of the accessibility of all pages.